Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
|
#122
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
|
#123
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
|
#125
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
In article om, 5@
5.com says... On 5/6/2012 1:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Sat, 05 May 2012 13:17:55 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 11:44 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 10:37:50 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:30 AM, wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 08:50:05 -0400, wrote: In , says... You do understand that a very significant number of "released" fish die from the experience? Actually, treated correctly, most do NOT die and most don't hardly suffer at all. Fish don't have the same neurology network that other animals do. I bet PETA would disagree with you. So? I am just pointing out the incongruities in "I"'s argument He started out saying he was always catch and release, then he said he eats the bass he catches, now he says the fish doesn't even feel a hook in his cheek. That is denial. Who "he"? "I" man And it's a lie, I never, ever said I "always catch and release". Musta been Krause who said it then. Alter ego, |
#126
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
In article ,
says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 5/6/2012 1:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Sat, 05 May 2012 13:17:55 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 11:44 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 10:37:50 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:30 AM, wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 08:50:05 -0400, wrote: In , says... You do understand that a very significant number of "released" fish die from the experience? Actually, treated correctly, most do NOT die and most don't hardly suffer at all. Fish don't have the same neurology network that other animals do. I bet PETA would disagree with you. So? I am just pointing out the incongruities in "I"'s argument He started out saying he was always catch and release, then he said he eats the bass he catches, now he says the fish doesn't even feel a hook in his cheek. That is denial. Who "he"? "I" man And it's a lie, I never, ever said I "always catch and release". Musta been Krause who said it then. Alter ego, Bull****. Show me my exact quote then. I NEVER said I "always catch and release." |
#127
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On 5/6/2012 1:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On Sat, 05 May 2012 13:17:55 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 11:44 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 10:37:50 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:30 AM, wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 08:50:05 -0400, wrote: In , says... You do understand that a very significant number of "released" fish die from the experience? Actually, treated correctly, most do NOT die and most don't hardly suffer at all. Fish don't have the same neurology network that other animals do. I bet PETA would disagree with you. So? I am just pointing out the incongruities in "I"'s argument He started out saying he was always catch and release, then he said he eats the bass he catches, now he says the fish doesn't even feel a hook in his cheek. That is denial. Who "he"? "I" man And it's a lie, I never, ever said I "always catch and release". Musta been Krause who said it then. |
#128
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On Sun, 06 May 2012 12:20:12 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 05 May 2012 13:24:49 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 6:42 AM, JustWait wrote: On 5/5/2012 1:40 AM, wrote: On Fri, 04 May 2012 19:28:55 -0400, X ` Man wrote: Bass fishermen are different, nobody wants to eat a freshwater bass anyway, and artificials are perfect for them... Other fishermen catch fish you want to eat, and they don't do as well with artificials. I suppose you are gonna' tell us you never took a fish, never killed a fish, and never used natural bait, right??? Pffffttt. I suppose you will. Lots of people eat freshwater bass, jerkwater. Not serious bass fishermen. That is the old fish story isn't it? The largest recorded large mouth was reportedly caught by an old woman who had it weighed at a local store. When the word got out about it and the record people tracked her down, they were just finishing it up ... or so the legend goes. After all it is a fish story. None of the guys I fish fresh water with keep a bass. They will catch a mess of specks if they want a fish fry. On the other hand all of the salt water people I know are in the fillet and release club. Of course nobody eats fresh water Bass, he just said it, it's what he does... "Of course nobody eats fresh water Bass..." Yet another example of your not knowing anything real. Plenty of people eat freshwater largemouth bass. I said "serious bass fishermen". It is the same as serious "bill fish" fishermen. They put them back live if at all possible. Even if you want a mount, it seldom actually has any of your "fish" in it. Take a picture of it next to the boat and turn it loose. I had a Bass in a fishtank once. We would feed it a dozen 1 1/2 inch goldfish every week or so. It would get them all in less than a minute. Glittering scales would puff from the gills slits in a pretty cloud. Casady |
#129
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On Sun, 06 May 2012 15:37:53 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote: I had a Bass in a fishtank once. We would feed it a dozen 1 1/2 inch goldfish every week or so. It would get them all in less than a minute. Glittering scales would puff from the gills slits in a pretty cloud. ==== I have a cousin in Michigan with a pond behind her house that they stock with bass just for entertainment, sort of a real world fish tank. They feed the bass every evening just before sunset, some kind of fish food pellets that they buy. The bass show up right on schedule and go into a feeding frenzy when the pellets hit the water. Some of the bass have recognizable features and get named accordingly. |
#130
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On 5/6/2012 3:04 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 6 May 2012 13:32:57 -0400, wrote: In , says... Exactly my point! We are encroaching on the animal's land, not the other way around. Nobody ever said anything different. The only fix would be to wipe out a couple billion people. There you go, no different than regulated hunting of animals. I can't think of much that is more regulated now than the hunting of animals. My point is we are getting more habitat set aside by sportsmen than by animal rights people. PETA is about as interested in saving animals, as Planned Parenthood is in planning Parenthood... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Animal Welfare or "animal rights"? | General | |||
A fact concerning livestock animal husbandry | General | |||
Don't forget - tonight - Animal Planet... | General | |||
Animal Welfare or "animal rights"? | General | |||
did someone say animal facts? | General |