In article ,
says...

On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

Cyber-stalking: ......

snip

You definition is rather vague.....

I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again:

http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/

The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the
definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that
he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal
information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly
say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or
terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured.

Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he
can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria
of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including
stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe
insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking.

If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he
should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and
that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't
suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are
hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie
stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in
rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance.

The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul...


For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet?

That's pretty funny.

Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you
ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a
matter of public record?

There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your
actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I
won't dump your data, but someone else might.

Whoa!!! When someone did this just the other day to Don, he thought it
was an international incident of the highest priority!!!!

On 2/8/11 9:56 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

Cyber-stalking: ......

snip

You definition is rather vague.....

I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again:

http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/

The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the
definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that
he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal
information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly
say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or
terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured.

Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he
can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria
of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including
stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe
insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking.

If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he
should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and
that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't
suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are
hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie
stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in
rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance.

The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul...


For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet?

That's pretty funny.

Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you
ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a
matter of public record?

There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your
actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I
won't dump your data, but someone else might.

Whoa!!! When someone did this just the other day to Don, he thought it
was an international incident of the highest priority!!!!

Yes, I have prepared my wife and family for the threatening letters and
calls the left is so famous for here...


Why would someone threaten your wife? She isn't responsible for the way
you behave here. I'll bet your wife is as nice as John Herring's wife.
Herring is a flaming asshole, but his wife is pleasant and has manners.
I'll bet the same is true at your house.

On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:28:06 -0500, Harryk wrote:

On 2/8/11 9:56 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

Cyber-stalking: ......

snip

You definition is rather vague.....

I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again:

http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/

The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the
definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that
he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal
information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly
say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or
terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured.

Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he
can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria
of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including
stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe
insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking.

If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he
should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and
that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't
suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are
hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie
stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in
rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance.

The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul...


For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet?

That's pretty funny.

Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you
ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a
matter of public record?

There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your
actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I
won't dump your data, but someone else might.

Whoa!!! When someone did this just the other day to Don, he thought it
was an international incident of the highest priority!!!!

Yes, I have prepared my wife and family for the threatening letters and
calls the left is so famous for here...


Why would someone threaten your wife? She isn't responsible for the way
you behave here. I'll bet your wife is as nice as John Herring's wife.
Herring is a flaming asshole, but his wife is pleasant and has manners.
I'll bet the same is true at your house.


As it is February, I'll give you my response for this month.

I agree with everything you said about my wife, which is why I can't understand
your comment about her.

When you said that she said that you married an asshole, you were wrong. I don't
know if what you said was true or not, as I don't know your wife. I *do* know
that my wife would never say such a thing about your wife!

On Feb 8, 2:28*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 2/8/11 9:56 AM, I am Tosk wrote:









In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
* *wrote:

Cyber-stalking: ......

snip

You definition is rather vague.....

I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again:

http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/

The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the
definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that
he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal
information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly
say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or
terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured.

Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he
can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria
of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including
stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe
insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking.

If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he
should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and
that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't
suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are
hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie
stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in
rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance.

The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul...

For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet?

That's pretty funny.

Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you
ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a
matter of public record?

There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your
actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I
won't dump your data, but someone else might.

Whoa!!! When someone did this just the other day to Don, he thought it
was an international incident of the highest priority!!!!

Yes, I have prepared my wife and family for the threatening letters and
calls the left is so famous for here...

Why would someone threaten your wife? She isn't responsible for the way
you behave here. I'll bet your wife is as nice as John Herring's wife.
Herring is a flaming asshole, but his wife is pleasant and has manners.
I'll bet the same is true at your house.

I'll bet scottys Wife pukes in her mouth , thinking about having sex
with him. Now, mouthpiece...have your Spoofing " buddy " post
something else totally gross about my Wife. " Eye for an Eye"