|
Cyber-STalking
Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm
or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum. Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. |
Cyber-STalking
In article ,
says... On 2/7/11 3:33 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@giganews. com, says... Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum. Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? Well he should be embarrassed, but that does not fit the criteria for a cyber crime. Remember, the distress caused must meet the criteria of causing a reasonable person "distress". Embarrassed that your home looking like **** and covered in trash, would not meet that criteria. If he filed a civil lawsuit against you, my guess is the judge or jury would make him pay for your attorney fees and court costs, and tell him to pick up his trash. He's too dumb to be embarrassed. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 3:33*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. * Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. *If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum.. * *Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. *Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. *Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. *In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. *Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/11 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... Paul's post would probably qualify as a legitimate threat to conspire to cause distress. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:26*pm, Hadenough wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, you threatened to kill my kid, this is a death penalty state... You would leave in a box... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com