|
Cyber-STalking
Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm
or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum. Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. |
Cyber-STalking
In article ,
says... On 2/7/11 3:33 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@giganews. com, says... Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum. Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? Well he should be embarrassed, but that does not fit the criteria for a cyber crime. Remember, the distress caused must meet the criteria of causing a reasonable person "distress". Embarrassed that your home looking like **** and covered in trash, would not meet that criteria. If he filed a civil lawsuit against you, my guess is the judge or jury would make him pay for your attorney fees and court costs, and tell him to pick up his trash. He's too dumb to be embarrassed. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 3:33*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. * Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. *If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum.. * *Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. *Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. *Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. *In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. *Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/11 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... Paul's post would probably qualify as a legitimate threat to conspire to cause distress. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:26*pm, Hadenough wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, you threatened to kill my kid, this is a death penalty state... You would leave in a box... |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:39*pm, paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" * wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:39*pm, paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" * wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The difference is I am not embarassed to be associated with my words, as you are... |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/2011 5:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:26 pm, wrote: On Feb 7, 5:21 pm, wrote: On Feb 7, 5:12 pm, I am wrote: In articlev8WdnTduvp7l8M3QnZ2dnUVZ_ridn...@giganews. com, says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, you threatened to kill my kid, this is a death penalty state... You would leave in a box... No one has to kill your kid. Your pushing her into motorcycle racing probably will do the job. -- I'm proud to be a progressive. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. -- I'm proud to be a progressive. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/2011 5:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The difference is I am not embarassed to be associated with my words, as you are... Are you referring to your words in which you call people ugly names, publish their actual names and addresses, threaten them physically, and worse? I'm sure your words don't embarrass you. But they would embarrass any decent person. -- I'm proud to be a progressive. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Feb 7, 5:26*pm, Hadenough wrote: On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, you threatened to kill my kid, this is a death penalty state... You would leave in a box... Ummm...Wrong, dork. What I "said " is this.... "Your Daughter should watch out, Hunters could be in the area, and bullets can stray" You loose....again. Try again, dork. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:52*pm, paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, *wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" * * wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh Salty! Ha. ask him how the alt.americanidol,littleboys or NAMBLA is doing.. He ran from here a while ago when he was outed too;) He was a real disgusting pig, that's for sure. Along the lines of you or Slammer... |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:57*pm, Hadenough wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:26*pm, Hadenough wrote: On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, you threatened to kill my kid, this is a death penalty state... You would leave in a box... Ummm...Wrong, dork. What I "said " is this.... "Your Daughter should watch out, Hunters could be in the area, and bullets can stray" You loose....again. Try again, dork.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ok how about "I am going to send a package and blow your neighbors up, tick, tick, tick".. Gonna' run from that one too. Either way, all I would have to do is send one of your graphic rants against homosexuals to your locals, and you go down for hate crimes, they are very strict up there... Look it up asshole... Oh, and how about telling my wife, "if you don't shut your husband up, bad things could happen", I suppose that was not a threat either.. Face it Slammer, out of everybody here, if I decided to ruin your miserable life, it would not be hard.... |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:53*pm, paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, *wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" * * wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The difference is I am not embarassed to be associated with my words, as you are... Are you referring to your words in which you call people ugly names, publish their actual names and addresses, threaten them physically, and worse? I'm sure your words don't embarrass you. But they would embarrass any decent person. -- I'm proud to be a progressive. Lets not forget the absolute trashy talk about my deceased Mother. MY tirade...started AFTER those awe full words were posted...right here. Tosky wont remember the "panty-sniffing,dead mother " comments. He'll weasel out, AGAIN. At least I know WHAT I said . You get everything YOU bring upon YOURSELF. Go ahead, post the address you THINK I live at. You posted right here, TODAY...that... " We know where you are" Make sure that's put in your little Legal Folder. I'll put it in mine. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/2011 5:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
Oh Salty! Could be Eisboch or Tom too. The whole "I got a tell all email about you" is just another attempt at intimidation, which is Paul's modus operandi, vis a vis, "you must be a small person...". It fits with being a tenured educator with an over inflated ego. I do want him to tell us about when he almost set a lab on fire by accident. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/11 5:39 PM, paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. Wow, talking about emails circulating around with personal info including an actual address, that sure sounds like Cyber-Stalking to me. LOL |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:57*pm, Hadenough wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:26*pm, Hadenough wrote: On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, you threatened to kill my kid, this is a death penalty state... You would leave in a box... Ummm...Wrong, dork. What I "said " is this.... "Your Daughter should watch out, Hunters could be in the area, and bullets can stray" You loose....again. Try again, dork.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, go back and read the previous paragraph. It's clear you are coming to CT do do me and my family harm... Try all you want, read the last post I made, listen to Gene, and say thank you to my wife for saving your pathetic ass... |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 6:00*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Feb 7, 5:57*pm, Hadenough wrote: On Feb 7, 5:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:26*pm, Hadenough wrote: On Feb 7, 5:21*pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Feb 7, 5:12*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 2/7/11 5:06 PM, *e#c wrote: On Feb 7, 3:33 pm, I am *wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews. com, says... Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? And how embarrassed will you be, handing over my OLD address to your Spoofing buddy, to post pictures of the TWO houses I used to live in? Hmmmmmmmmm? Scott xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It would appear that many people in rec.boats don't believe this meets the criteria for cyberstalking. Slammer is squirming now.. Two houses, in two years.. right. We know where you are but I have been avoiding your bull**** for the sake of the group. You know how crazy you get when someone fights back;) Yes, TWO Houses. Rented out 106, and lived at 108. After my Mothers passing, we sold both. Now, I know you're squirming, trying to find my address. You gave my OLD addresses to your ID Spoofing "buddy", to post pictures on here. Now that your (readily available from your Website) address is available, you are crying .....again. Get a grip, you loose. Scott Ingersoll 79 Brian Road South Windsor, Connecticut OH yeah.... let's not forget your juicy little statement...ahem... :" Between me, you, and the State..you leave in a ****ing box !!!!" Now, lie like the little weasel you are, and deny you posted THAT, asshole.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Uh, you threatened to kill my kid, this is a death penalty state... You would leave in a box... Ummm...Wrong, dork. What I "said " is this.... "Your Daughter should watch out, Hunters could be in the area, and bullets can stray" You loose....again. Try again, dork.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ok how about "I am going to send a package and blow your neighbors up, tick, tick, tick".. Gonna' run from that one too. Either way, all I would have to do is send one of your graphic rants against homosexuals to your locals, and you go down for hate crimes, they are very strict up there... Look it up asshole... Oh, and how about telling my wife, "if you don't shut your husband up, bad things could happen", I suppose that was not a threat either.. Face it Slammer, out of everybody here, if I decided to ruin your miserable life, it would not be hard.... "I am going to send a package and blow your neighbors up, tick, tick, tick".. More lies. You admitted you lie earlier today, ON HERE. Give up, you loose, dork. "if you don't shut your husband up, bad things could happen" Funny how you keep re-writing my words. Try again. You "seem " to think you can " decide to ruin my life". I challenge you to try, asshole. I can easily come up with more derogatory posts from YOU, than YOU can from ME. Face it, you've been ranting, and threatening on this NG waaaaaay before I showed up, hero. YEARS before. Give up, shut your pie-hole, and move to West Virginia. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 6:10*pm, Despot wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: Oh Salty! Could be Eisboch or Tom too. The whole "I got a tell all email about you" is just another attempt at intimidation, which is Paul's modus operandi, vis a vis, "you must be a small person...". It fits with being a tenured educator with an over inflated ego. I do want him to tell us about when he almost set a lab on fire by accident. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 5:58*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Feb 7, 5:52*pm, paulatbyc wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, *wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" * * wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy.. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh Salty! *Ha. ask him how the alt.americanidol,littleboys or NAMBLA is doing.. He ran from here a while ago when he was outed too;) He was a real disgusting pig, that's for sure. Along the lines of you or Slammer... Oh my! Just look at the derogatory remarks Tosky is making about NAMBLA....****ing hypocrite-loser. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 6:14*pm, "A.True.Boater" wrote:
On 2/7/11 5:39 PM, paulatbyc wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. Wow, talking about emails circulating around with personal info including an actual address, that sure sounds like Cyber-Stalking to me. * LOL Fact is, if this blows up, Paul will be right here in the middle of it. He has opened his big mouth too many times for any judge looking into not to call him, in... and of course if not, I certainly will make sure our atty does.... He really should have been smart enough to stay out of it, but he saw a feeding frenzy and though he could score some brownie points... ;) He changed his handle to try to wash his tracks, but I already have the felony post and another pre-felony post similar earlier in the day saved with headers... I think suggesting hacking a site twice in one day, constitutes conspiracy. Remember, you don't have to bomb a building, you just got to talk about it with someone. The law is quite clear and if Paul is smart, he will shut up and lay low.. And hope nothing comes of this... Just sayin' anybody here that is neutral like Greg, Dick, Wayne, etc I am sure could chime in here and tell Paul, "Yes, you did **** up".. but either way, I still don't think anybody but Gene thinks I broke any laws yesterday.... |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/7/2011 5:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Feb 7, 5:52 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh Salty! Ha. ask him how the alt.americanidol,littleboys or NAMBLA is doing.. He ran from here a while ago when he was outed too;) He was a real disgusting pig, that's for sure. Along the lines of you or Slammer... I don't recall anyone named Salty or Oh Salty, sorry. I'm fairly certain, though, that no one here tops you as a "real disgusting pig," to use your own words. I'm still awaiting the arrival of your buddy at the club, whom you dispatched to "stalk" me. Will you be publishing the actual names and addresses of any more posters here? Would you consider that stalking? -- I'm proud to be a progressive. |
Cyber-STalking
On Feb 7, 6:30*pm, paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:52 pm, *wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, * *wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" * * * wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy.. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh Salty! *Ha. ask him how the alt.americanidol,littleboys or NAMBLA is doing.. He ran from here a while ago when he was outed too;) He was a real disgusting pig, that's for sure. Along the lines of you or Slammer... I don't recall anyone named Salty or Oh Salty, sorry. I'm fairly certain, though, that no one here tops you as a "real disgusting pig," to use your own words. I'm still awaiting the arrival of your buddy at the club, whom you dispatched to "stalk" me. Will you be publishing the actual names and addresses of any more posters here? Would you consider that stalking? -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Funny how you progressives are.. Here it is, Don has been talking about my house and neighborhood in a negative disgusting manner for years.. The size of my house, and made up stories of bad conditions, etc... Suggesting that my neighbors and the locals hated the local boatbuilder, which of course was not the case.. So now I post a picture to show folks what I think his house looks like and you all start crying. Donnie shouldn't have lied about my place for so long if he wasn't ready to have it compared to his... |
Cyber-STalking
I am Tosk wrote:
In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@giganews. com, says... Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum. Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? I'm glad he finally got his son to leave. He must have taken up half of that house. |
Cyber-STalking
A.True.Boater wrote:
On 2/7/11 3:33 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleaMSdnR7s3YVFzs3QnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@giganews. com, says... Cyber-stalking: repeatedly sending message that include threats of harm or are highly intimidating; engaging in other online activities that make a person afraid for his or her safety. Read mo http://pursuitmag.com/cyber-crime-te...#ixzz1DJ0Ueikx Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] There seems to be some confusion about what constitutes cyber-stalking. Since no threats of harm or posting private information that would put anyone in danger, no crime was committed. If one does not want private information available to others, they should follow the advice of the experts, and not post and publish private information in a public forum. Especially when the only objective in posting in the private forum is to insult and inflame others. If Don White doesn't want to read any message from Tosk, it is very easy to not read rec.boats, or to filter Tosk. Don White's personal information has been easily available to anyone interested for years. Don White posted the information himself. Don White has been warned for many years that it was not prudent to publish his personal information in a public forum, he decided not to follow the advice of experts. In reality, Don White thought and made numerous posts stating that everyone should be required to publish their real name and address to be able to make a post in rec.boats. Based upon the actions and posts made by Don White no reasonable person would consider this to be sufficient information to cause a reasonable person distress. Well, Donnie might be in distress.. Can you imagine how frekin' embarrassed he is now:) ? Well he should be embarrassed, but that does not fit the criteria for a cyber crime. Remember, the distress caused must meet the criteria of causing a reasonable person "distress". Embarrassed that your home looking like **** and covered in trash, would not meet that criteria. If he filed a civil lawsuit against you, my guess is the judge or jury would make him pay for your attorney fees and court costs, and tell him to pick up his trash. He's in Canada. He would have a hard time with any sort of prosecution. He could pay a lawyer, but that would be futile. |
Cyber-STalking
Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ Don's in Canada and he denied it was his house anyway so what would be the crime? |
Cyber-STalking
paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. A conspiracy! |
Cyber-STalking
paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. WAFA2 |
Cyber-STalking
|
Cyber-STalking
In article ,
says... On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. Whoa!!! When someone did this just the other day to Don, he thought it was an international incident of the highest priority!!!! |
Cyber-STalking
In article ,
says... On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. Gee, how do you know Harry is out of town? |
Cyber-STalking
In article ,
says... On 2/7/2011 5:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:52 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure paul.. So Harry is sending my addy around. So what? At least he is not conspiring to commit felony as you did yesterday.. Sorry, it wasn't your hero, Harry. The email I got came from a poster who lives in our state of Connecticut. Besides, Harry is or was out of town for a few days. Oh, the email had a "lot" of information, not just your address, which you'll note I did not disclose. By the way, are you and your wife the people depicted on your commerical web site? I thought you were short and had a long ponytail. The people in those photos look like WASPs from central casting. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh Salty! Ha. ask him how the alt.americanidol,littleboys or NAMBLA is doing.. He ran from here a while ago when he was outed too;) He was a real disgusting pig, that's for sure. Along the lines of you or Slammer... I don't recall anyone named Salty or Oh Salty, sorry. I'm fairly certain, though, that no one here tops you as a "real disgusting pig," to use your own words. I'm still awaiting the arrival of your buddy at the club, whom you dispatched to "stalk" me. Will you be publishing the actual names and addresses of any more posters here? Would you consider that stalking? Not if it's public information. |
Cyber-STalking
In article ,
says... On 2/7/2011 5:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, wrote: On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. -- I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The difference is I am not embarassed to be associated with my words, as you are... Are you referring to your words in which you call people ugly names, publish their actual names and addresses, threaten them physically, and worse? I'm sure your words don't embarrass you. But they would embarrass any decent person. Gee, you haven't been reading Don and Harry's posts? I guess they aren't decent persons because those two start name calling and insulting as soon as someone points out one of their lies. |
Cyber-STalking
On 2/8/11 9:56 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... In , says... On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater" wrote: Cyber-stalking: ...... snip You definition is rather vague..... I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again: http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/ The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the definition I posted. Since Donnie has stated for many many years that he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured. Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria of cyber-stalking. Since Donnie has made numerous insults including stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking. If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. Donnie can't suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in rec.boats. Donnie can't even plead ignorance. The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul... For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet? That's pretty funny. Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a matter of public record? There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I won't dump your data, but someone else might. Whoa!!! When someone did this just the other day to Don, he thought it was an international incident of the highest priority!!!! Yes, I have prepared my wife and family for the threatening letters and calls the left is so famous for here... Why would someone threaten your wife? She isn't responsible for the way you behave here. I'll bet your wife is as nice as John Herring's wife. Herring is a flaming asshole, but his wife is pleasant and has manners. I'll bet the same is true at your house. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com