On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Sep 8, 7:50*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:35:12 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

great article in 'slate'...

http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews

multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know.

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives!

LMAO!! You constantly whine about not having any money, and having
been screwed. So where does that leave you?
buffy = not too smart

it leaves me with the other members of the middle class who are hated
by the right

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:13:42 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:50:18 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews

multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know.

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives!

If you are so smart, why haven't you had a raise in 37 years?

because the right wing has tunred the US into a plutocracy

ever look up how many members of blue collar families go to ivy league
schools?

ever look up the rates of social mobility in the US?

1 of 2 conclusions is possible:

1. ALL children of blue collar workers are stupid
2. there is little social mobility in the US

gee. i wonder which of these the DATA supports...tell me, right
winger...which is true?

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Sep 8, 7:50 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:35:12 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

great article in 'slate'...

http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews

multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know.

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives!

LMAO!! You constantly whine about not having any money, and having
been screwed. So where does that leave you?
buffy = not too smart

it leaves me with the other members of the middle class who are hated
by the right

You definition of middle class includes what income range?

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, jps wrote:

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce.

Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks
were for income redistribution. ;-)

That depends upons whose income is being redistributed.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, jps wrote:

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce.

Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks
were for income redistribution. ;-)

Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely
aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but
I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA.

If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a
livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine
about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess.

You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce
versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot
produce anything.

On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote:

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce.

Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks
were for income redistribution. ;-)

Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely
aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but
I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA.

If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a
livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine
about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess.

You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce
versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot
produce anything.


Tell that to the Japanese.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote:

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce.

Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks
were for income redistribution. ;-)

Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely
aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but
I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA.

If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a
livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine
about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess.

You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce
versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot
produce anything.


Tell that to the Japanese.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---


Another asshole for the bozo bin.

On 9/9/10 10:17 AM, Harry ¿ wrote:
"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote:

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more
likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red
ones.

Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce.

Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks
were for income redistribution. ;-)

Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely
aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but
I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA.

If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a
livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine
about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess.

You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce
versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot
produce anything.


Tell that to the Japanese.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---


Another asshole for the bozo bin.



You think Japan is rich in raw materials, eh?
Another moron ID faker is what you are.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 9/9/10 12:25 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:00:00 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote:

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce.

Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks
were for income redistribution. ;-)

Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely
aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but
I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA.

If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a
livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine
about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess.

You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce
versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot
produce anything.

Actually manufacturing is increasingly moving to the red states.
Unfortunately Bob is right.


Because it is easier to exploit red state workers.

On 9/9/10 12:28 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:08:41 -0400, Secular
wrote:

On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote:

The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely
to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones.

Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce.

Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks
were for income redistribution. ;-)

Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely
aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but
I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA.

If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a
livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine
about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess.

You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce
versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot
produce anything.


Tell that to the Japanese.


Last time I looked the Japanese were in more trouble than us.
Their manufacturing model failed when MDQ took over. (Market Driven
Quality) AKA WalMart


The point was in raw materials. The Japanese import most of theirs
to produce the goods they export.