"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 9/29/09 6:47 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
"H the wrote in message
m...
On 9/29/09 6:18 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
"Lu wrote in message
...
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a liberal
doesn't like guns, he feels that no one should have one.

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a liberal
is,
he wants to ban all meat products for everyone.

If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat
his
enemy. A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look
good.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.

If a liberal is homosexual, he loudly demands legislated respect.

If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as
independently successful. Their liberal counterparts see themselves as
victims in need of government protection.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his
situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him
.
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A
liberal
non-believer wants any mention of God or religion silenced.

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping
for
it, or may choose a job that provides it.

A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

Excellent analogy, don't mind if I borrow it?

Nothing like perpetuating the right-wing bull****, eh, lemmings?

"If a conservative is a homosexual, he looks for fun in the mens' room
at
the Minneapolis airport."

Leave it to you to know the places.

It was featured on the news for at least two months...where were you...in
the next booth in that mens' room?

You are judged then by what you watch.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...

"Lu Powell" wrote in message
...
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a liberal
doesn't like guns, he feels that no one should have one.

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a liberal is,
he wants to ban all meat products for everyone.

If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat
his enemy. A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look
good.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.

If a liberal is homosexual, he loudly demands legislated respect.

If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as
independently successful. Their liberal counterparts see themselves as
victims in need of government protection.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his
situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him
.
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal
non-believer wants any mention of God or religion silenced.

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping
for it, or may choose a job that provides it.

A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

Excellent analogy, don't mind if I borrow it?


Not a bit. I did also.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:31:48 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

This makes so much sense to you because you have a binary brain.

I thank god you're not still a peace officer.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:13:09 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:31:48 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

This makes so much sense to you because you have a binary brain.

I thank god you're not still a peace officer.

Just remember....
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:13:09 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:31:48 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

This makes so much sense to you because you have a binary brain.

I thank god you're not still a peace officer.

Just remember....
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Out of a random generator perhaps, they binary isn't interpretable by
anything.

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:50:57 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:13:09 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:31:48 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

This makes so much sense to you because you have a binary brain.

I thank god you're not still a peace officer.

Just remember....
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Out of a random generator perhaps, they binary isn't interpretable by
anything.


OK. I'll admit that you're way over my head.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"If a conservative is a homosexual, they quietly enjoy their life. If
a liberal is a homosexual, they loudly demand legislated respect."

Uh, NO, not quite. If a conservative is homosexual, he won't
necessarily IDENTIFY as such, he may get married and father children
to help advance his own political career, and he'll spout hypocritical
anti-Gay positions ... but still enjoy engaging in furtive, anonymous
sexual encounters with other men, usually at motels, roadside rest
areas, and airport bathrooms.

Whereas if a liberal is homosexual, he will more like live his life
openly, honestly, and with political integrity, and advocate equal
treatment for all law-abiding, taxpaying citizens regardless of sexual
orientation.

As for what you call "legislated respect," you and I both know there
really is no such thing. No amount of legislation could coerce you
into respecting anyone. Do you know anyone who is Gay? Do you know any
longterm Gay couples? And if so, is it possible for you to respect the
commitment they have made to each other?

Perhaps not. Perhaps no Gay person would get your respect. But the
fact remains that there is simply no Constitutional justification for
denying law-abiding Gay individuals and couples the very same legal
benefits and responsibilities that Straight individuals and couples
have always taken for granted.

Let's go back to your original statement, and simply change
"homosexual" to "black." Perhaps you would say, "If a liberal is
black, he will loudly demand his civil rights. If a conservative is
black, he will be content to sit in the back of the bus."

"PolishBear" wrote in message
...
"If a conservative is a homosexual, they quietly enjoy their life. If
a liberal is a homosexual, they loudly demand legislated respect."

Uh, NO, not quite. If a conservative is homosexual, he won't
necessarily IDENTIFY as such, he may get married and father children
to help advance his own political career, and he'll spout hypocritical
anti-Gay positions ... but still enjoy engaging in furtive, anonymous
sexual encounters with other men, usually at motels, roadside rest
areas, and airport bathrooms.

Whereas if a liberal is homosexual, he will more like live his life
openly, honestly, and with political integrity, and advocate equal
treatment for all law-abiding, taxpaying citizens regardless of sexual
orientation.

As for what you call "legislated respect," you and I both know there
really is no such thing. No amount of legislation could coerce you
into respecting anyone. Do you know anyone who is Gay? Do you know any
longterm Gay couples? And if so, is it possible for you to respect the
commitment they have made to each other?

Perhaps not. Perhaps no Gay person would get your respect. But the
fact remains that there is simply no Constitutional justification for
denying law-abiding Gay individuals and couples the very same legal
benefits and responsibilities that Straight individuals and couples
have always taken for granted.

Let's go back to your original statement, and simply change
"homosexual" to "black." Perhaps you would say, "If a liberal is
black, he will loudly demand his civil rights. If a conservative is
black, he will be content to sit in the back of the bus."

My, aren't we a tad touchy over a bit of tongue-in-cheek banter? "Methinks
thou dothe protest too much..."

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 05:44:41 -0700 (PDT), PolishBear
wrote:

"If a conservative is a homosexual, they quietly enjoy their life. If
a liberal is a homosexual, they loudly demand legislated respect."

Uh, NO, not quite. If a conservative is homosexual, he won't
necessarily IDENTIFY as such, he may get married and father children
to help advance his own political career, and he'll spout hypocritical
anti-Gay positions ... but still enjoy engaging in furtive, anonymous
sexual encounters with other men, usually at motels, roadside rest
areas, and airport bathrooms.

Whereas if a liberal is homosexual, he will more like live his life
openly, honestly, and with political integrity, and advocate equal
treatment for all law-abiding, taxpaying citizens regardless of sexual
orientation.

As for what you call "legislated respect," you and I both know there
really is no such thing. No amount of legislation could coerce you
into respecting anyone. Do you know anyone who is Gay? Do you know any
longterm Gay couples? And if so, is it possible for you to respect the
commitment they have made to each other?

Perhaps not. Perhaps no Gay person would get your respect. But the
fact remains that there is simply no Constitutional justification for
denying law-abiding Gay individuals and couples the very same legal
benefits and responsibilities that Straight individuals and couples
have always taken for granted.

Let's go back to your original statement, and simply change
"homosexual" to "black." Perhaps you would say, "If a liberal is
black, he will loudly demand his civil rights. If a conservative is
black, he will be content to sit in the back of the bus."

Homosexual couples should have all the rights as heterosexual couples.
Just don't call it marriage. Why do you capitalize 'gay'. Is it now a
proper noun? Is it more a proper noun than heterosexual?
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.