JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...

Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't really
appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this country anyway)
would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for sure. I'm a liberal
when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current events
also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of ignoring
facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late in
the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly evaluating
those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on
the right who are leadership roles (in name or in fact).

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.

She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR
money around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:31:54 -0400, Jim wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...

Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't really
appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this country anyway)
would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for sure. I'm a liberal
when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current events
also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of ignoring
facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late in
the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly evaluating
those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on
the right who are leadership roles (in name or in fact).

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.

She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR
money around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?

....a staunch liberal fiscally conservative socialist - depending on
the source of the money.

Makes sense to me.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...


Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really
appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this country anyway)
would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for sure. I'm a
liberal
when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events
also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of ignoring
facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late in
the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly evaluating
those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on
the right who are leadership roles (in name or in fact).

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


Feel free to leave if you don't like my quality or quantity of posts. I'm
sure you'll do well somewhere.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...

Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this
country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for
sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of
ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late
in the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly
evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson,
Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in name or in
fact).

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.

She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make and
keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR money
around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?


I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious time.
I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to tell me
otherwise, of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 9/30/09 1:21 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...


Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really
appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this country anyway)
would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for sure. I'm a
liberal
when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events
also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of ignoring
facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late in
the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly evaluating
those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on
the right who are leadership roles (in name or in fact).

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


Feel free to leave if you don't like my quality or quantity of posts. I'm
sure you'll do well somewhere.



I tried to get him to re-enlist in the army so he could be shipped off
to Iraq and with his body keep a potentially useful young American from
being shot.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On 9/30/09 1:22 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...

Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this
country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for
sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of
ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late
in the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly
evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson,
Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in name or in
fact).

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.

She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make and
keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR money
around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?


I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious time.
I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to tell me
otherwise, of course.


Ouch!


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

"JohnH" wrote in message
...

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
--
John H



~~ Snerk ~~
In other words...she wised up to you very quickly.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...

Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really
appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this country anyway)
would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for sure. I'm a
liberal
when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events
also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of ignoring
facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late in
the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly evaluating
those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on
the right who are leadership roles (in name or in fact).
It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


Feel free to leave if you don't like my quality or quantity of posts. I'm
sure you'll do well somewhere.

I rather think it's you who is going to melt down and have to be swept
out the door. I might be wrong. We'll see.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...
Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this
country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative for
sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of
ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too late
in the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly
evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson,
Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in name or in
fact).
It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make and
keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR money
around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?


I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious time.
I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to tell me
otherwise, of course.

Based on the information you have provided I can easily say you are
wrong. Move over Donny we have another dip**** on board.

H the K wrote:
On 9/30/09 1:22 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...

i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...

Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this
country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal
conservative for
sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of
ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly
dropping the
ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too
late
in the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly
evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson,
Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in name or in
fact).

It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.

She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and
keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR
money
around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?


I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious time.
I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to tell me
otherwise, of course.


Ouch!


When it comes to charity, Harry will tell you that he is proud that his
father in law is a philanthropist. I guess that makes Harry generous by
association.