Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... btw, rhys, have *you* ever purposely spun an airplane?(indeed, do you even know how?) Wendy has, for the fun of it. She will do just fine as a sailor. Flying is flying, and sailing is sailing. I think they are two different and distinct skill sets, and proficiency in one will not necessarily indicate proficiency in the other, navigation notwithsanding. While events occur much more rapidly in an airplane than in a boat, what is more important is that the dimensional and situational aspects are completely different, and thus require different skill sets. I can fly. I can't sail- haven't got a clue what to do when decision time rolls around as regards reefing, what sail to set, etc. The fact that I was able to learn how to fly indicates that I might be able to learn how to sail. No more, no less. Wendy |
#112
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:18:13 GMT, Rosalie B.
wrote: There are lots of teachers in lots of places that are teaching lots of stuff that 'ain't so'. It's a hazard of life, and not particular to the USCGX or the USPS or any other venue. One of my children's 5th grade teachers taught them that the blood in the veins is actually bright blue like in the illustrations. And some songs teach that a square is not a rectangle. One of the things that one does is to integrate what one already knows into what they are telling you and if it doesn't compute, you question them until they admit defeat!!! (or throw you out of class - I had one teacher in a course I took as an adult that said I was every teacher's nightmare) I took a CGAUX course in the late 1970s, when I had been sailing for 15 years. I learned quite a bit. I had previously taken a Coastal Navigation course at the American Museum of Nat Hist. I got a second instructor because the class was oversubscribed, and I got taught some that wasn't so. However, by that time I could tell. The text was Duttons. I joined the auxiliary and taught until this year, when I retired. The requirements added on by Homeland Security were getting to be a bit much. I never got a uniform. The Aux courses, and the similar USPS courses, teach far more than many people know who buy a boat and go. Especially with motor boats, but also with club racing sailboats. In all the time I taught, Nobody (except me :-) ever aced the test. Even my wife got one question wrong. Still, such a course mainly exposes you to a series of topics that anyone should know a lot more about, but it also guides the student toward further learning. The problem of people teaching things that aren't so, or are oversimplified enough to be misleading, is everywhere.It is exacerbated by volunteer instructors. But it isn't bad enough to make the courses worthless. Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry. - Richard Dawkins, "Viruses of the Mind" |
#113
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:18:13 GMT, Rosalie B.
wrote: There are lots of teachers in lots of places that are teaching lots of stuff that 'ain't so'. It's a hazard of life, and not particular to the USCGX or the USPS or any other venue. One of my children's 5th grade teachers taught them that the blood in the veins is actually bright blue like in the illustrations. And some songs teach that a square is not a rectangle. One of the things that one does is to integrate what one already knows into what they are telling you and if it doesn't compute, you question them until they admit defeat!!! (or throw you out of class - I had one teacher in a course I took as an adult that said I was every teacher's nightmare) I took a CGAUX course in the late 1970s, when I had been sailing for 15 years. I learned quite a bit. I had previously taken a Coastal Navigation course at the American Museum of Nat Hist. I got a second instructor because the class was oversubscribed, and I got taught some that wasn't so. However, by that time I could tell. The text was Duttons. I joined the auxiliary and taught until this year, when I retired. The requirements added on by Homeland Security were getting to be a bit much. I never got a uniform. The Aux courses, and the similar USPS courses, teach far more than many people know who buy a boat and go. Especially with motor boats, but also with club racing sailboats. In all the time I taught, Nobody (except me :-) ever aced the test. Even my wife got one question wrong. Still, such a course mainly exposes you to a series of topics that anyone should know a lot more about, but it also guides the student toward further learning. The problem of people teaching things that aren't so, or are oversimplified enough to be misleading, is everywhere.It is exacerbated by volunteer instructors. But it isn't bad enough to make the courses worthless. Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry. - Richard Dawkins, "Viruses of the Mind" |
#114
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 03:32:13 GMT, "Wendy"
wrote: "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... btw, rhys, have *you* ever purposely spun an airplane?(indeed, do you even know how?) Wendy has, for the fun of it. She will do just fine as a sailor. Flying is flying, and sailing is sailing. I think they are two different and distinct skill sets, and proficiency in one will not necessarily indicate proficiency in the other, navigation notwithsanding. While events occur much more rapidly in an airplane than in a boat, what is more important is that the dimensional and situational aspects are completely different, and thus require different skill sets. I can fly. I can't sail- haven't got a clue what to do when decision time rolls around as regards reefing, what sail to set, etc. The fact that I was able to learn how to fly indicates that I might be able to learn how to sail. No more, no less. You will be able to learn to sail. It is flying (gliding) at the boundary between two fluids, with foils scaled to fit the fluid. But Please!! learn to sail before you start worrying about what kind of boat you want. You will learn to sail fastest in a boat barely big enough to hold you. That is because you will feel the effect of everything you do very soon. Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry. - Richard Dawkins, "Viruses of the Mind" |
#115
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 03:32:13 GMT, "Wendy"
wrote: "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... btw, rhys, have *you* ever purposely spun an airplane?(indeed, do you even know how?) Wendy has, for the fun of it. She will do just fine as a sailor. Flying is flying, and sailing is sailing. I think they are two different and distinct skill sets, and proficiency in one will not necessarily indicate proficiency in the other, navigation notwithsanding. While events occur much more rapidly in an airplane than in a boat, what is more important is that the dimensional and situational aspects are completely different, and thus require different skill sets. I can fly. I can't sail- haven't got a clue what to do when decision time rolls around as regards reefing, what sail to set, etc. The fact that I was able to learn how to fly indicates that I might be able to learn how to sail. No more, no less. You will be able to learn to sail. It is flying (gliding) at the boundary between two fluids, with foils scaled to fit the fluid. But Please!! learn to sail before you start worrying about what kind of boat you want. You will learn to sail fastest in a boat barely big enough to hold you. That is because you will feel the effect of everything you do very soon. Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry. - Richard Dawkins, "Viruses of the Mind" |
#116
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wendy" wrote in message vers.com... Hi- I'm new to this group, and while I have done some archive digging I have a few questions I was hoping I might get some answers to. Specifically, I am interested in a sailboat in the 35'-40' range that is suitable for serious offshore work to include transatlantic crossings. The boat should be easy to sail, obviously well-built, preferably sloop-rigged, and (here's the catch!) around $80,000 or so. I would live aboard the boat- I'm single with no kids- while building up a cruising kitty. I am going to look at a 1990 34' Pacific Seacraft this weekend; at $99,000 it is more than I would like to pay but perhaps it's negotiable. There is also a 1985 Cheoy Lee Pedrick 36 (yes, I know about the teak decks) at $60,000 that has caught my eye. Obviously one gets what one pays for, and the Seacraft is no doubt the better boat, but is the Cheoy Lee suitable for serious passages? I know Westsail is a definite possibility, but what other boats should I consider based on my plans and price range? http://www.mahina.com/cruise.html#boats4cruising John Neal's site (expedition sailing adventures) has a very good list of boats that he considers suitable for offshore trips. I tend to agree with most of his choices and comments. -- Evan Gatehouse you'll have to rewrite my email address to get to me ceilydh AT 3web dot net (fools the spammers) |
#117
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wendy" wrote in message vers.com... Hi- I'm new to this group, and while I have done some archive digging I have a few questions I was hoping I might get some answers to. Specifically, I am interested in a sailboat in the 35'-40' range that is suitable for serious offshore work to include transatlantic crossings. The boat should be easy to sail, obviously well-built, preferably sloop-rigged, and (here's the catch!) around $80,000 or so. I would live aboard the boat- I'm single with no kids- while building up a cruising kitty. I am going to look at a 1990 34' Pacific Seacraft this weekend; at $99,000 it is more than I would like to pay but perhaps it's negotiable. There is also a 1985 Cheoy Lee Pedrick 36 (yes, I know about the teak decks) at $60,000 that has caught my eye. Obviously one gets what one pays for, and the Seacraft is no doubt the better boat, but is the Cheoy Lee suitable for serious passages? I know Westsail is a definite possibility, but what other boats should I consider based on my plans and price range? http://www.mahina.com/cruise.html#boats4cruising John Neal's site (expedition sailing adventures) has a very good list of boats that he considers suitable for offshore trips. I tend to agree with most of his choices and comments. -- Evan Gatehouse you'll have to rewrite my email address to get to me ceilydh AT 3web dot net (fools the spammers) |
#118
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... hey, rhys, NO one suggested you were forced to buy the "Japanese Standard" in condoms. You wanted a center cockpit boat, you got one. Live with it. Motor with it. Enjoy the large aft stateroom/small salon. It was your choice. Small point, but rhys doesn't have a centre cockpit boat and didn't say he did. He does have an Ontario Viking 33, an older C&C design with an aft cockpit. He did say he has a friend with a centre cockpit. I suppose I'm about to get flamed for pointing out the obvious... -- Ken Heaton & Anne Tobin Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca |
#119
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... hey, rhys, NO one suggested you were forced to buy the "Japanese Standard" in condoms. You wanted a center cockpit boat, you got one. Live with it. Motor with it. Enjoy the large aft stateroom/small salon. It was your choice. Small point, but rhys doesn't have a centre cockpit boat and didn't say he did. He does have an Ontario Viking 33, an older C&C design with an aft cockpit. He did say he has a friend with a centre cockpit. I suppose I'm about to get flamed for pointing out the obvious... -- Ken Heaton & Anne Tobin Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca |
#120
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rodney Myrvaagnes" wrote in message ... You will learn to sail fastest in a boat barely big enough to hold you. That is because you will feel the effect of everything you do very soon. Yah, I've got a 17' Hobie Cat now- very fast, very twitchy. It's the sport model, with no jib, but it's loads of fun. I've learned a lot on it ("how to upright your catmaran" was the first lesson ![]() to something a bit more serious. Wendy |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1967 Cruiser Craft. | General | |||
Need Advice: Cruising Catamaran, Trimaran, Cruiser or Motorsailer | Cruising | |||
Newbie 24ft cruiser questions? | General | |||
September Great Lakes Cruiser | Cruising |