Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Not sure that matters much. If the fuel can negoatiate the baffles then I suspect the crud can as well. Hence the problem. Once the fuel is shaken not stirred ![]() Yes, but just bubbling up the fuel in one baffled area doesn't cut it. Capt. Bill |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from
one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Not sure that matters much. If the fuel can negoatiate the baffles then I suspect the crud can as well. Hence the problem. Once the fuel is shaken not stirred ![]() Yes, but just bubbling up the fuel in one baffled area doesn't cut it. Capt. Bill |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. But unless the fuel is shaken up real well most of the crud is still at the bottom of each baffled area in a nice little mound. Capt. Bill |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still
runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Doug s/v Callista "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. But unless the fuel is shaken up real well most of the crud is still at the bottom of each baffled area in a nice little mound. Capt. Bill |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing
systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty sure I posted a link early in this conversation that shows a diagram
of a polishing system based on a GCF F-1 filter that allows either polishing or running with the F-1 as the first filter before going into the Racor while running. If I didn't, or you can't find it, here it is again: http://www.trawlerworld.com/features_06.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:21:58 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. I guess I don't understand your system. Why would it require two independent polishing systems? Even with a single set of filters (GCF fillowed by Racor) you can use valves and piping to plumb the thing any way you want. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty sure I posted a link early in this conversation that shows a diagram
of a polishing system based on a GCF F-1 filter that allows either polishing or running with the F-1 as the first filter before going into the Racor while running. If I didn't, or you can't find it, here it is again: http://www.trawlerworld.com/features_06.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:21:58 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. I guess I don't understand your system. Why would it require two independent polishing systems? Even with a single set of filters (GCF fillowed by Racor) you can use valves and piping to plumb the thing any way you want. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problem changing out my fuel pump | General | |||
Engine dies- Putters when trying to plane- engine under under heavy load | General | |||
Can a single 72 gal per hour fuel pump run two 392 cu inch motors? | General | |||
Inboard won't run above 2800 RPM | General | |||
Fuel pump to carbs fuel line replacement | General |