Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The silliest thing I've seen in a while
http://community-2.webtv.net/tassail.../captureD4.jpg
Talk about having no lateral stability. Look at the keel and note how it is only about two or three feet in width. It must track like a squirrelly race boat. Then notice the inefficient end plates that fail to take into account the fact that having them commence at the leading edge of the rudder is causing more drag then if they were placed toward the aft side of the keel. Funny how some people seem to think they can guess better than an engineer can design. CN |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ok CN,
I'll play with you for a little bit. By the way' what the hell are you doing up this late or early in the morning? Having trouble with that "Tin Can" cabin heater already? Anyway, I seem to remember a boat with a very similar 'funny looking' keel was the first boat to end a 150 year reign of American Cup domination. Those aren't end plates, Dopey! There Wings. Look at their shape again and try to figure the action of a Wing Keel. I'm going to bed now. So, you'll have time to think about the action of a "Wing Keel" Also, think about the comparison of the Entry of my boat and the Bulbous, knuckle shape bow and leading blunt edge of that forward placed Keel on your Tub, Then we'll talk about helm action. Good nite Salty ( make believe) I'll read your reply in the AM Ole Thom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Capt. Neal® wrote:
Funny how some people seem to think they can guess better than an engineer can design. Bwahahahahahah Add that gem to the list of Nealisms. Makes Jax look positively erudite. Rick |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message Then notice the inefficient end plates that fail to take into account the fact that having them commence at the leading edge of the rudder is causing more drag then if they were placed toward the aft side of the keel. It's a picture of the keel...... those are wings. CM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Ok CN, I'll play with you for a little bit. By the way' what the hell are you doing up this late or early in the morning? Having trouble with that "Tin Can" cabin heater already? The cabin heater is working fine. To tell you the truth I was up waiting for a call from someone even hotter than my famous cabin heater - Lady Pilot to be exact. Don't tell Moroon though or he might get jealous. Anyway, I seem to remember a boat with a very similar 'funny looking' keel was the first boat to end a 150 year reign of American Cup domination. On a race boat such a keel is de rigeur but on a pilot house cruising boat it is out of place. It compares to putting some of those old Cadillac tail fins on a modern-day Corvette. Those aren't end plates, Dopey! There Wings. Look at their shape again and try to figure the action of a Wing Keel. Wings??? Sorry old chap, but they function as end plates to control the vortex. Even when they are installed on a 747 they are called end plates. (or some call them winglets.) I'm going to bed now. So, you'll have time to think about the action of a "Wing Keel" Also, think about the comparison of the Entry of my boat and the Bulbous, knuckle shape bow and leading blunt edge of that forward placed Keel on your Tub, Then we'll talk about helm action. Dopey! Think about what a shark or a porpoise - some of the fastest animals in the water looks like. It is bulbous and it goes quite fast. The fiction about slim being better at sea is just that fiction. Ever look beneath the water on an oceangoing ship. Most likely you will see a bulbous looking thing. If a sharp entry was so great they would not bother with the bulb. Savvy kimosabe? CN |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I think you hit the nail on the head Thom.....
Your Pilot house is well suited for your area. The vessel looks good with it and it extends your sailing season. Only a limp wristed tropical sailor without experience of sailing in the colder latitudes and thusly with self imposed limitations as to where he can venture would ever cast doubt as to the functionality of a Pilot House on such a fine vessel. Let's face it... he can't even differentiate between your keel and rudder yet. I think it smacks of pure jealousy... on Neal's part. I'm certain that Cut The Mustard would be a fine dinghy for your vessel. :-) CM "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Hey CN, I'm up and a Very Good Morning to you and the ASA, from the NW Thought I'd start the day off with a picture of the Pilothouse in her Slip. I think she is a beauty but she's mine and that is a slanted view. Likes get some comments from the group. Did you have a chance yet to figure out how a "Wing Keel" functions? I'll give you some time to work out your answer. In the meantime, I'd like to state that I have as much stability and less leeway than "Cut the Mustard" due to the depth of "Pneuma's" keel Also less heel, giving me more effective sail area Again, Good Morning Ole Thom -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Wings are on birds and airplanes. On a sailboat keel those appendages are end plates. Just because some stupid magazine writer calls them wings does not make it so. CN "Overproof" wrote in message news:IMXwd.2822$nN6.143@edtnps84... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message Then notice the inefficient end plates that fail to take into account the fact that having them commence at the leading edge of the rudder is causing more drag then if they were placed toward the aft side of the keel. It's a picture of the keel...... those are wings. CM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
CN,
You've given some REALLY Supid reasoning but I guess we can blame the source. CN, take your own example; THE SHARK;--- You sound like you never seen one! Their frontal profile is pointed. POINTED. Its mouth and teeth aren't in the way |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
They come to a point, yes, a bulbous point. Look at your typical
submarine, dear sir, is there a point or a nice bulbous shape? Look at most any jet airplane and note the nose does not come to a point. Look at the space shuttle. Do you see any points there? I suppose it's too much to ask that anyone here really understand hydrodynamics but at least try. To get a fat object like a sailboat through the water efficiently you've got to consider a couple of things. One is wetted surface. You can have less wetted surface with a bulb (a sphere is the shape with minimum surface area vs. volume) than with some long drawn out point. That is a simple fact. It follows with a ballast keel that a bulb is the most efficient shape as far as hydrodynamics and containing the volume necessary is concerned. You want the weight low because it's ballast. You want hydrodynamic efficiency - you want a bulb for a cruiser. Granted, a long, deep skinny keel is best for a racer but they are not constrained by draft like a cruiser is. Do you own a racer or a cruiser. Answer that question before you screw up a cruiser chasing racer dreams. CN "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... CN, You've given some REALLY Supid reasoning but I guess we can blame the source. CN, take your own example; THE SHARK;--- You sound like you never seen one! Their frontal profile is pointed. POINTED. Its mouth and teeth aren't in the way |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Take a look at the AM Cup Racers.... do you see a bulbous nose on
any???....NO! Do birds have really big heads.... no Does a fine entry provide less friction... Yes! CM "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... They come to a point, yes, a bulbous point. Look at your typical submarine, dear sir, is there a point or a nice bulbous shape? Look at most any jet airplane and note the nose does not come to a point. Look at the space shuttle. Do you see any points there? I suppose it's too much to ask that anyone here really understand hydrodynamics but at least try. To get a fat object like a sailboat through the water efficiently you've got to consider a couple of things. One is wetted surface. You can have less wetted surface with a bulb (a sphere is the shape with minimum surface area vs. volume) than with some long drawn out point. That is a simple fact. It follows with a ballast keel that a bulb is the most efficient shape as far as hydrodynamics and containing the volume necessary is concerned. You want the weight low because it's ballast. You want hydrodynamic efficiency - you want a bulb for a cruiser. Granted, a long, deep skinny keel is best for a racer but they are not constrained by draft like a cruiser is. Do you own a racer or a cruiser. Answer that question before you screw up a cruiser chasing racer dreams. CN "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... CN, You've given some REALLY Supid reasoning but I guess we can blame the source. CN, take your own example; THE SHARK;--- You sound like you never seen one! Their frontal profile is pointed. POINTED. Its mouth and teeth aren't in the way |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The human mind is a wonderful thing | ASA | |||
what's this thing in the cockpit? | General | |||
Let's get this license thing straight once and for all | ASA | |||
Cromwell, Nik Warrenson, same thing? | ASA |