Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message Maxprop wrote: Nope. It will be in the 40'-44' range, which should easily do 7kts. under power, and somewhat better under sail in the right conditions. We've looked at a Cheoy Lee Pedrick 41, a Passport (Perry) 40, and a Baltic Doug Peterson 42, any of which would fit the bill. Look at a Nordic 40 or 44. Another Perry design. I remember when those boats first hit the market, and they looked great. Unfortunately they seem rather rare. None anywhere around here, and not too many on Yachtworld.com either. The Baltic DP is a great boat. The one we saw was a bit beat up, but could be reconditioned. I'd like to find a better example. We also saw a Baltic J/V and it, too, was a touch under the weather. The Baltics are among our first choices for a replacement to our current boat. The quality of the Sagas is excellent Not my impression of them. Have you looked carefully in all the nooks & crannies? Not really. A friend has an '02 Saga 43, and on the surface it looks like a quality machine, but we didn't actually did into the boat. It is very fast, however, and handles wonderfully in a trailing sea. ... and they are very fast for boats with such an accomodating cruising interior. Again I disagree. They're pretty fast, but not to touch a *fast* 43 footer. And they're not all that roomy, they're too narrow. Makes them tender, too. I didn't detect this when sailing our friend's boat. We had 20-30kts. with 5-7' rollers on the port quarter for a 35 statute mile trip, which we made in just over 3 hours, pierhead to pierhead. I tend to favor narrower boats for some reason. Perhaps it has something to do with watching all the newer, beamier plastic fantastics pushing tons of water out of the way, leaving a substantial wake, dragging transoms, etc. Probably a visceral reaction, rather than one based upon facts and performance. I understand there is a Saga 43 that sails to a 78 PHRF rating on the Chesapeake, but the one here that I've sailed would have a hard time being competitive at 100+. And that's not fast for a 40+ footer. But I should be careful, we have a friends with one. It's a really really nice boat. For the money, they could have had a Baltic or Dynamique, but they are happy with the Saga and that's what counts. As I mentioned earlier, they're all too new for us to consider. I'm not willing to take the whopping first several years' depreciation on any boat, so we're not considering anything newer than roughly eight years old. No Sagas in that category. I'd rather have a Swan or Baltic anyway. And I just got a lead on a pristine Passport 40 today. We'll take a look at it when the snow begins to melt, if it's still available. Max |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look at a Nordic 40 or 44. Another Perry design.
Maxprop wrote: I remember when those boats first hit the market, and they looked great. Unfortunately they seem rather rare. None anywhere around here, and not too many on Yachtworld.com either. Probably true. I saw a listing for a centerboard Nordic 40 a while back, a critter I had no idea existed. My wife loved the Nordic and so I showed her. She's still mad at me about suggesting a New York 40 centerboard model.... .... The Baltics are among our first choices for a replacement to our current boat. That'd be a good call IMHO. The quality of the Sagas is excellent Not my impression of them. Have you looked carefully in all the nooks & crannies? Not really. A friend has an '02 Saga 43, and on the surface it looks like a quality machine, but we didn't actually did into the boat. It is very fast, however, and handles wonderfully in a trailing sea. I bilge-crawled intensively through two different ones at two boat shows, and came away unimpressed. They seem to cut a lot of corners in hidden places. I have not sailed the boat in a following sea but the hull shape seems likely to do that. As for fast, that's relative. Certainly they're a hell of a lot faster than the crab-crushers they seem to be replacing in many people's idealogy. As I mentioned earlier, they're all too new for us to consider. I'm not willing to take the whopping first several years' depreciation on any boat, so we're not considering anything newer than roughly eight years old. No Sagas in that category. I'd rather have a Swan or Baltic anyway. And I just got a lead on a pristine Passport 40 today. We'll take a look at it when the snow begins to melt, if it's still available. Commendable approach. Not being in a hurry is wise when boat shopping. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message I bilge-crawled intensively through two different ones at two boat shows, and came away unimpressed. They seem to cut a lot of corners in hidden places. I have not sailed the boat in a following sea but the hull shape seems likely to do that. As for fast, that's relative. Certainly they're a hell of a lot faster than the crab-crushers they seem to be replacing in many people's idealogy. That's an interesting point, and one which I think sums up a lot in terms of crusing design these days. Away from the ponderous Taiwanese joinery masterpieces toward narrower, faster, lighter displacement hulls without the fine furniture store ambience below. When checking out my friend's Saga, I didn't have the time to pay much scrutiny to construction, rather a cursory examination of rigging, deck, and interior amenities. I was on the helm for most of the trip, which is where I wanted to be anyhoo. Commendable approach. Not being in a hurry is wise when boat shopping. We're in a unique position, for once in our lives. We have a very attractive boat with all the bells, whistles, and extras, and it's a great sailor with acceptable amenities and better-than-average strength and build quality for a 34 footer. We're not in any hurry to part with her, so essentially it'll take a pretty spectacular boat at a reasonable price to make the deal. We have, by my reckoning, at least 8 years before the deadline of having to upgrade to a larger boat. Max |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
heck...you want a boat that is broken in and proven, don't ya?
----snip-------------------- " I'm not willing to take the whopping first several years' depreciation on any boat, so we're not considering anything newer than roughly eight years old. No Sagas in that category. I'd rather have a Swan or Baltic anyway. And I just got a lead on a pristine Passport 40 today. We'll take a look at it when the snow begins to melt, if it's still available." |