| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
G I wouldn't have to because I wouldn't get in a collision to
begin with because I'd hail them and find out their intentions. Then, of course, just before the collision if you insist that there must be one, I would run below, disconnect the fuel line, and claim that I tried to start the engine but it wouldn't happen, so I tried everything in my power to avoid. The best defense is a good offense. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: night sailing - too close for comfort. From: "Jonathan Ganz" Date: 08/15/2004 22:21 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: I agree, but I don't think I'd want to try and argue if the CG determines it was on. How do I prove it wasn't being used to propel the boat? G Let's carry this a step further. You have a sailboat with an engine fitted, that is not running, and you have a collision. How do you prove that it was not running and being used for propulsion? I think (and here we'd need a Maritime Lawyer's input) it would be on the shoulders of the CG (or whomever) to prove you were using the engine to propel the boat. Shen |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| American Sailing Association frequently asked questions | ASA | |||
| History of the American Sailing Navy - 1949 - Chapelle | Tall Ships | |||
| History of the American Sailing Navy - 1949 - Chapelle | Boat Building | |||
| Best night for the Willie T? | Cruising | |||
| Escapism Sailing | ASA | |||