Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: night sailing - too close for comfort.
From: "Jonathan Ganz" Date: 08/15/2004 22:21 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: I agree, but I don't think I'd want to try and argue if the CG determines it was on. How do I prove it wasn't being used to propel the boat? G Let's carry this a step further. You have a sailboat with an engine fitted, that is not running, and you have a collision. How do you prove that it was not running and being used for propulsion? I think (and here we'd need a Maritime Lawyer's input) it would be on the shoulders of the CG (or whomever) to prove you were using the engine to propel the boat. Shen |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
G I wouldn't have to because I wouldn't get in a collision to
begin with because I'd hail them and find out their intentions. Then, of course, just before the collision if you insist that there must be one, I would run below, disconnect the fuel line, and claim that I tried to start the engine but it wouldn't happen, so I tried everything in my power to avoid. The best defense is a good offense. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: night sailing - too close for comfort. From: "Jonathan Ganz" Date: 08/15/2004 22:21 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: I agree, but I don't think I'd want to try and argue if the CG determines it was on. How do I prove it wasn't being used to propel the boat? G Let's carry this a step further. You have a sailboat with an engine fitted, that is not running, and you have a collision. How do you prove that it was not running and being used for propulsion? I think (and here we'd need a Maritime Lawyer's input) it would be on the shoulders of the CG (or whomever) to prove you were using the engine to propel the boat. Shen |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: night sailing - too close for comfort.
From: "Jonathan Ganz" Date: 08/16/2004 10:31 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: G I wouldn't have to because I wouldn't get in a collision to begin with because I'd hail them and find out their intentions. Then, of course, just before the collision if you insist that there must be one, I would run below, disconnect the fuel line, and claim that I tried to start the engine but it wouldn't happen, so I tried everything in my power to avoid. The best defense is a good offense. G Ahhhh, but you had the collision. Now it becomes a question of apportioning blame, and since you had the collision, you goofed at some point in the process. Naturally, if you can communicate and everyone understands each others intentions, more often than not the collision will be avoided. It's not a "pure" process, however. Shen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
American Sailing Association frequently asked questions | ASA | |||
History of the American Sailing Navy - 1949 - Chapelle | Tall Ships | |||
History of the American Sailing Navy - 1949 - Chapelle | Boat Building | |||
Best night for the Willie T? | Cruising | |||
Escapism Sailing | ASA |