Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and
will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.


I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren.

Eisboch




Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the
speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage.
Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure
you know.

A poster repeatedly posting photos of little clone grandchildren in a
usenet boating discussion group or discussion board doesn't pass the
"who gives a ****" test. It's not the same as posting photos of a
handsome and clever dog. Dogs are always on topic.

I can almost "smell" the GOP convention next week...plenty of talk about
Jesus, an end to abortion, corporate entitlements, lies about how
drilling will end our energy crisis, lower taxes for the deserving
wealthy, "I was a POW for five years," and "he's an independent thinker"
but of course he isn't.

So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom?


--
No way, no how, no McCain!

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was
good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.


I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his
grandchildren.

Eisboch



Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the
speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage.
Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure
you know.

A poster repeatedly posting photos of little clone grandchildren in a
usenet boating discussion group or discussion board doesn't pass the
"who gives a ****" test. It's not the same as posting photos of a
handsome and clever dog. Dogs are always on topic.

Poorly composed and exposed photos of an old stump and trash must also
be appropriate to this NG.

What did you think of that touching photo of Eisboch sitting and
chatting with his son?

On Aug 28, 8:25*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
m...

Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was
good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.

I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his
grandchildren.

Eisboch

Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the
speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage.
Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure
you know.

A poster repeatedly posting photos of little clone grandchildren in a
usenet boating discussion group or discussion board doesn't pass the
"who gives a ****" test. It's not the same as posting photos of a
handsome and clever dog. Dogs are always on topic.

Poorly composed and exposed photos of an old stump and trash must also
be appropriate to this NG.

Don't forget the painted hoochie.. she should be out playing sports,
not practicing her "pouty face" for some perv with a camera..

What did you think of that touching photo of Eisboch sitting and
chatting with his son?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good
and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.


I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his
grandchildren.

Eisboch


Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the
speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage.
Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure
you know.



So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom?

Wrong, ballot-breath. I am a registered nothing, consider myself an
Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies on most
issues. In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as you. gasp

I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered" member
of any political party. Doing so tends to make one accept and, by default,
support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in agreement with.
Lemmings. We saw that during the Dem's convention. Compromises of
principles by all for the "common good" of the party. Past differences
forgotten. Nope, not for me.

I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the
USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best
forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise
and back room deals.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good
and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.

I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his
grandchildren.

Eisboch

Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the
speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage.
Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure
you know.


So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom?

Wrong, ballot-breath. I am a registered nothing, consider myself an
Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies on most
issues. In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as you. gasp

I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered" member
of any political party. Doing so tends to make one accept and, by default,
support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in agreement with.
Lemmings. We saw that during the Dem's convention. Compromises of
principles by all for the "common good" of the party. Past differences
forgotten. Nope, not for me.

I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the
USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best
forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise
and back room deals.

Eisboch



You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If
you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly
Republican, I am sure, especially for President.

I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party
platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea
what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father
in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I
suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document.

So, what is your guess on the GOP veep?




--
No way, no how, no McCain!

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was
good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.

I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his
grandchildren.

Eisboch

Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the
speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on
stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as
I am sure you know.


So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom?

Wrong, ballot-breath. I am a registered nothing, consider myself
an Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies
on most issues. In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as
you. gasp

I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered"
member of any political party. Doing so tends to make one accept and,
by default, support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in
agreement with. Lemmings. We saw that during the Dem's convention.
Compromises of principles by all for the "common good" of the party.
Past differences forgotten. Nope, not for me.

I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests
of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who
will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through
political compromise and back room deals.

Eisboch



You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If
you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly
Republican, I am sure, especially for President.

I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party
platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea
what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father
in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I
suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document.

I think you completely missed the point that Eisboch was making.

On Aug 28, 8:41*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
news:dtmdnW4FMIWtDivVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@comcast. com...

Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was
good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters..

I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his
grandchildren.

Eisboch

Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the
speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on
stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as
I am sure you know.

So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom?

Wrong, ballot-breath. * *I am a registered nothing, *consider myself
an Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies
on most issues. *In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as
you. *gasp

I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered"
member of any political party. *Doing so tends to make one accept and,
by default, support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in
agreement with. Lemmings. * We saw that during the Dem's convention. *
Compromises of principles by all for the "common good" of the party. *
Past differences forgotten. * *Nope, not for me.

I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests
of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who
will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through
political compromise and back room deals.

Eisboch

You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If
you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly
Republican, I am sure, especially for President.

I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party
platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea
what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father
in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I
suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document.

I think you completely missed the point that Eisboch was making.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Really, I am registered repub, but have voted for more Democrats for
pres, than repubs.. First off, I am an American...

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:42 -0400, hk wrote:


So, what is your guess on the GOP veep?

Jeb Bush ;-)

wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:42 -0400, hk wrote:


So, what is your guess on the GOP veep?

Jeb Bush ;-)


In this household, we never could figure why the Bush family passed over
the smart son and pushed the stupid one into the White House.

That would be funny, though...McCain and Bush, all over again.

I had been thinking it would be Romney...he's such a pretty boy attack
dog, he could well be the Dan McQuayle of the 21st Century. Then I was
hoping it would be Lieberman...naw.




--
No way, no how, no McCain!

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:50:39 -0400, hk wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:42 -0400, hk wrote:


So, what is your guess on the GOP veep?

Jeb Bush ;-)


In this household, we never could figure why the Bush family passed over
the smart son and pushed the stupid one into the White House.

That would be funny, though...McCain and Bush, all over again.

Seriously, if it weren't for his name, Jeb might not be a bad pick.