"hk" wrote in message
. ..
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.

I'm posting under my own name. So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.


Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with the
copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her what
your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since the
first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show you
that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.

I don't know how accurate Google is but they only list about 60 posts total
to rec.boats since Sep 2007 from camacdonaldiii. I wonder if they were all
aimed at you.


http://tinyurl.com/5rofon

On Aug 17, 6:28*pm, hk wrote:
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
Don't bet on it. *If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. *I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.

I'm posting under my own name. *So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. *If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.

Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.

Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers. If you try to
avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
papers on you. Cheers, Dude.

camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk wrote:
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
I'm posting under my own name. So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.
Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.

Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers. If you try to
avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
papers on you. Cheers, Dude.



I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:40:39 -0400, TJ wrote:

hk wrote:


You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
drooling into rec.boats.


You know, that brings up a question that I have that nobody seems to be
able to answer in a way that adds up. Of course, I'm just a simple
country boy who doesn't know much about high finance, so maybe you can
explain it to me.

Medicare is just about to the point where it spends out more than it
takes in, and Baby Boomers like me are going to break Social Security by
the time we all retire if something drastic isn't done - and soon.
Medicare could be called a sort of "universal health care" for the aged
and the disabled. My question is simple: If the US taxpayers can't
afford to provide health care to the aged and disabled, how the hell can
we afford to provide it for EVERYBODY? And how can we do it while
simultaneously balancing the budget, restoring the economy, defending
the country, and switching everybody to more expensive "green" energy?

Stopping the war might be enough to balance the budget, but it won't do
the rest, too. Taxing the profits of oil companies until they all go
bankrupt would be bad for the economy, and taxing just the rich won't
help because they don't have enough money. Most of the money in this
country is held by the middle class. Cutting government waste would
help, but you'd have to cut ALL of the pet projects, not just the ones
of the minority party, and that'll never happen, no matter which party
is in power.

So what is the Liberal Democrat solution? And I don't want to hear about
all the things the Republicans have done wrong - I want to hear about
what YOU'D DO. And those of you who are Conservatives, what would YOU
do? I've asked these questions of several political animals, of several
parties, and nobody's given me a straight answer that made any sense
yet. Can any of you be the first?

TJ

Giving everyone $1000 is a good start towards fixing those problems. If,
after that, the problems still exist, Obama will probably give everyone
$2000. For sure, the problems will go away then.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

On Aug 17, 10:13*pm, hk wrote:
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk wrote:
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
Don't bet on it. *If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. *I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
I'm posting under my own name. *So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. *If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.
Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.

Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers. *If you try to
avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
papers on you. *Cheers, Dude.

I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No one lies more about you than.........YOU.....
Lobster boat
Dad's trans-Atlantic trip in a runabout
Ensuing fireboat welcome in NYC
Single handing around the horn
Sailing from SF to Hawaii
to name a few.

On Aug 18, 8:23*am, wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:13*pm, hk wrote:





camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk wrote:
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
Don't bet on it. *If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. *I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
I'm posting under my own name. *So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. *If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.
Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.

Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers. *If you try to
avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
papers on you. *Cheers, Dude.

I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No one lies more about you than.........YOU.....
Lobster boat
Dad's trans-Atlantic trip in a runabout
Ensuing fireboat welcome in NYC
Single handing around the horn
Sailing from SF to Hawaii
to name a few.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
the quality of her advise. Such a suit is practically unwinable not
matter what Harry has done in usenet.

hk wrote:
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:36 am, wrote:

If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
the quality of her advise (sic). Such a suit is practically
unwinable not (sic)
matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Her brother, if she exists, put up a post advising someone not to go out
for a boat ride with me because I "was dangerous." There literally are
dozens of posts from "camac" in which he libels me. Apparently "camac"
likes to dish it out, but he can't take it, and has to go running to his
seeeeeester for help. :)



It does look like Gene's server needs tweaking if it will be able to
really be a productive filter.

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:21:49 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:12:10 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:17:12 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:58:46 -0400, TJ wrote:

John H. wrote:


Giving everyone $1000 is a good start towards fixing those problems. If,
after that, the problems still exist, Obama will probably give everyone
$2000. For sure, the problems will go away then.
--
** Good Day! **

As I said, I'm just a simple country boy. You need to explain things
more fully, or I don't understand them. Assuming by "everyone" you mean
all 300 million or so Americans, That could come to as much as, uh let
me see... Wait a minute, my calculator doesn't go that high, I need a
pencil... Ah! I get $9 trillion. Sounds like a bargain to me, although I
don't see how it would work. The $600 Bush gave almost everyone only
helped during one quarter.

Exactly where do you expect them to get that money? Should they just
print it up? From what I heard, that would devalue our falling dollar
even more than it is now, and that $3000 would have less power than it
might have. They could borrow it from China or somebody, but wouldn't
that increase the deficit even more? Doesn't sound like a good way to
balance the budget. If I did something lie that, I'd hear nasty things
from my banker. But then, I'm not the government, am I?

Hmmm. I'm not so sure about that one, but we'll put it on the list.
Anybody got any other ideas?

TJ

Where does Obama get the money? From the same place Pelosi or Reid would
get the money. Taxes. Higher taxes. Income redistribution on a grand
scale.

Ya mean like the $1200 that Bush recently sent everybody? Bush simply
borrowed the money from China. He knows you are good for it, or maybe
your children and grandchildren will settle up...

Bush sent me nothing, and I'm part of everybody.

No, tax cheats who don't file a return, are part of a smaller
sub-group.

wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:21:49 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:12:10 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:17:12 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:58:46 -0400, TJ wrote:

John H. wrote:

Giving everyone $1000 is a good start towards fixing those problems. If,
after that, the problems still exist, Obama will probably give everyone
$2000. For sure, the problems will go away then.
--
** Good Day! **
As I said, I'm just a simple country boy. You need to explain things
more fully, or I don't understand them. Assuming by "everyone" you mean
all 300 million or so Americans, That could come to as much as, uh let
me see... Wait a minute, my calculator doesn't go that high, I need a
pencil... Ah! I get $9 trillion. Sounds like a bargain to me, although I
don't see how it would work. The $600 Bush gave almost everyone only
helped during one quarter.

Exactly where do you expect them to get that money? Should they just
print it up? From what I heard, that would devalue our falling dollar
even more than it is now, and that $3000 would have less power than it
might have. They could borrow it from China or somebody, but wouldn't
that increase the deficit even more? Doesn't sound like a good way to
balance the budget. If I did something lie that, I'd hear nasty things
from my banker. But then, I'm not the government, am I?
Hmmm. I'm not so sure about that one, but we'll put it on the list.
Anybody got any other ideas?

TJ
Where does Obama get the money? From the same place Pelosi or Reid would
get the money. Taxes. Higher taxes. Income redistribution on a grand
scale.
Ya mean like the $1200 that Bush recently sent everybody? Bush simply
borrowed the money from China. He knows you are good for it, or maybe
your children and grandchildren will settle up...
Bush sent me nothing, and I'm part of everybody.

No, tax cheats who don't file a return, are part of a smaller
sub-group.



Herring is retired. If memory serves, you had to have earned income to
get the tax rebate. Your tax dollars are paying for Herring's
retirement, too.

There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage in
self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
"vacations" that last more than a week.

Whatever one thinks of Jimmy Carter, one has to admire many of his
"retirement" activities that are aimed at helping the less fortunate.
My father in law, retired, is a lifelong conservative Republican, but he
says Carter is his model for "doing good for others" in retirement.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..


There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage in
self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
"vacations" that last more than a week.



You may feel better if and when you ever get a sense of accomplishment or
satisfaction of your efforts in life.
Meanwhile, keep trying.

Eisboch