On Aug 17, 6:28*pm, hk wrote:
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
Don't bet on it. *If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. *I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.

I'm posting under my own name. *So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. *If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.

Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.

Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers. If you try to
avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
papers on you. Cheers, Dude.