"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:36:59 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 2, 8:23 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message

...http://www.eisboch.com/ec.jpg

Eisboch

Was listening to a Jazz station a couple of days ago and they were doing
an
all time great guitar countdown. Carlos Santana was 15th and Eric
Clapton
ranked 4th. Who else would be high on the list?

Well, I am not a critic, but I like Jeff Beck, and of course a great
guitarist list would not be complete without Roy Clark..

Jazz guitarists moron. :)

Come to think of it, Santana and Clapton hardly qualify as "jazz"
guitarists.

Clapton maybe - bluesy kind of thing as "maybe" jazz.


Was the rating limited to Jazz? I took it as all time great guitarists.

Eisboch

On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:42:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:56:37 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:44 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote in ...
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
I suppose it is for photographers not interested in life as it is,
or for photographers whose composition and exposure skills are
minimal.
I like life as it is. I like to take photos that look as close to
what I saw as possible.
We recently came across an old, forgotten box of family photos.
One was my high school graduation "glamour" shot ..... you know,
the ones that were airbrushed back at the studio to remove a few
pimples, add a tinge of ruddy red to the cheeks and enhance the
color of the eyes.
In my case, I am kinda glad the photographer didn't simply
reproduce what he saw. It wasn't pretty.
Eisboch
Did you have a flattop?
Here's a photo of someone's 14-year-old granddaughter.
Do you think it has been photoshopped?
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...eous/diana.jpg
Actually it was photoshoped, using CS3. If you look at the exif data
you actually made 25 adjustments in photoshop.
I think she is a beautiful young woman, but the lighting is not
complementary to her or her skin tone. The photo looks flat like you
had the light directly behind you when you took the photo.
How come the picture disappeared?
Because the guy I wanted to see it saw it.
Harry, I noticed you did not disagree with the fact that you
photoshopped the file in CS3.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
shhhhh, he's busy deflecting.. The guy is a fraud, every last post..
I had to download the photo to run the EXIF data, so I still have it.

The killer though is the photo would have been a really nice portrait if
he did not have her facing directly into the window.

Would you mind putting it back up?

http://i339.photobucket.com/albums/n...ts/diana-1.jpg

It would have been a really nice portrait if the photographer knew
what he was doing.

That's freakin horrible.

Pretty girl with fine bone structure like that deserves much better.

On Aug 2, 8:50*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:42:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."



wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:56:37 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:44 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote in ....
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
I suppose it is for photographers not interested in life as it is,
or for photographers whose composition and exposure skills are
minimal.
I like life as it is. I like to take photos that look as close to
what I saw as possible.
We recently came across an old, forgotten box of family photos.. *
One was my high school graduation "glamour" shot ..... you know,
the ones that were airbrushed back at the studio to remove a few
pimples, add a tinge of ruddy red to the cheeks and enhance the
color of the eyes.
In my case, I am kinda glad the photographer didn't simply
reproduce what he saw. *It wasn't pretty.
Eisboch
Did you have a flattop?
Here's a photo of someone's 14-year-old granddaughter.
Do you think it has been photoshopped?
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...eous/diana.jpg
Actually it was photoshoped, using CS3. *If you look at the exif data
you actually made 25 adjustments in photoshop.
I think she is a beautiful young woman, but the lighting is not
complementary to her or her skin tone. *The photo looks flat like you
had the light directly behind you when you took the photo.
How come the picture disappeared?
Because the guy I wanted to see it saw it.
Harry, I noticed you did not disagree with the fact that you
photoshopped the file in CS3.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
shhhhh, he's busy deflecting.. The guy is a fraud, every last post..
I had to download the photo to run the EXIF data, so I still have it.

The killer though is the photo would have been a really nice portrait if
he did not have her facing directly into the window.

Would you mind putting it back up?

http://i339.photobucket.com/albums/n...ts/diana-1.jpg

It would have been a really nice portrait if the photographer knew
what he was doing.

That's freakin horrible.

Pretty girl with fine bone structure like that deserves much better.

Much better? To make here look like she does not really look like?

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:45:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
http://www.eisboch.com/ec.jpg

Eisboch

Was listening to a Jazz station a couple of days ago and they were doing
an all time great guitar countdown. Carlos Santana was 15th and Eric
Clapton ranked 4th. Who else would be high on the list?

I'll betcha Jimi Henrix was number one ... or close.

No way.


Well, if the ratings Jim mentioned were Jazz artists only ..... I'd agree.
But if it was for the greatest guitarists overall, then Hendrix
consistently rates number one or two.

http://guitarplayerzen.com/2008/03/0...s-of-all-time/

Eisboch

On Aug 2, 8:54*pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 2, 8:50*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:



On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:42:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."

wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:56:37 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:44 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote in ...
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
I suppose it is for photographers not interested in life as it is,
or for photographers whose composition and exposure skills are
minimal.
I like life as it is. I like to take photos that look as close to
what I saw as possible.
We recently came across an old, forgotten box of family photos. *
One was my high school graduation "glamour" shot ..... you know,
the ones that were airbrushed back at the studio to remove a few
pimples, add a tinge of ruddy red to the cheeks and enhance the
color of the eyes.
In my case, I am kinda glad the photographer didn't simply
reproduce what he saw. *It wasn't pretty.
Eisboch
Did you have a flattop?
Here's a photo of someone's 14-year-old granddaughter.
Do you think it has been photoshopped?
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...eous/diana.jpg
Actually it was photoshoped, using CS3. *If you look at the exif data
you actually made 25 adjustments in photoshop.
I think she is a beautiful young woman, but the lighting is not
complementary to her or her skin tone. *The photo looks flat like you
had the light directly behind you when you took the photo.
How come the picture disappeared?
Because the guy I wanted to see it saw it.
Harry, I noticed you did not disagree with the fact that you
photoshopped the file in CS3.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
shhhhh, he's busy deflecting.. The guy is a fraud, every last post...
I had to download the photo to run the EXIF data, so I still have it.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:42:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:56:37 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:44 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote in ...
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
I suppose it is for photographers not interested in life as it is,
or for photographers whose composition and exposure skills are
minimal.
I like life as it is. I like to take photos that look as close to
what I saw as possible.
We recently came across an old, forgotten box of family photos.
One was my high school graduation "glamour" shot ..... you know,
the ones that were airbrushed back at the studio to remove a few
pimples, add a tinge of ruddy red to the cheeks and enhance the
color of the eyes.
In my case, I am kinda glad the photographer didn't simply
reproduce what he saw. It wasn't pretty.
Eisboch
Did you have a flattop?
Here's a photo of someone's 14-year-old granddaughter.
Do you think it has been photoshopped?
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...eous/diana.jpg
Actually it was photoshoped, using CS3. If you look at the exif data
you actually made 25 adjustments in photoshop.
I think she is a beautiful young woman, but the lighting is not
complementary to her or her skin tone. The photo looks flat like you
had the light directly behind you when you took the photo.
How come the picture disappeared?
Because the guy I wanted to see it saw it.
Harry, I noticed you did not disagree with the fact that you
photoshopped the file in CS3.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
shhhhh, he's busy deflecting.. The guy is a fraud, every last post..
I had to download the photo to run the EXIF data, so I still have it.

The killer though is the photo would have been a really nice portrait if
he did not have her facing directly into the window.
Would you mind putting it back up?
http://i339.photobucket.com/albums/n...ts/diana-1.jpg

It would have been a really nice portrait if the photographer knew
what he was doing.

That's freakin horrible.

Pretty girl with fine bone structure like that deserves much better.

That was my feeling exactly. While she is at the age where so many
girls are at that awkward "between" age, but she seems very comfortable
with herself. My guess is she will really blossom into a beauty. The
photo definitely does not do her justice.

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:48:23 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:36:59 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 2, 8:23 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message

...http://www.eisboch.com/ec.jpg

Eisboch

Was listening to a Jazz station a couple of days ago and they were doing
an
all time great guitar countdown. Carlos Santana was 15th and Eric
Clapton
ranked 4th. Who else would be high on the list?

Well, I am not a critic, but I like Jeff Beck, and of course a great
guitarist list would not be complete without Roy Clark..

Jazz guitarists moron. :)

Come to think of it, Santana and Clapton hardly qualify as "jazz"
guitarists.

Clapton maybe - bluesy kind of thing as "maybe" jazz.

Was the rating limited to Jazz? I took it as all time great guitarists.

Jim did say jazz radio station - assumed jazz guiratists.

Perhaps I'm wrong.

Which, oddly, is something that has happened before. :)

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:54:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:45:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
http://www.eisboch.com/ec.jpg

Eisboch

Was listening to a Jazz station a couple of days ago and they were doing
an all time great guitar countdown. Carlos Santana was 15th and Eric
Clapton ranked 4th. Who else would be high on the list?

I'll betcha Jimi Henrix was number one ... or close.

No way.


Well, if the ratings Jim mentioned were Jazz artists only ..... I'd agree.
But if it was for the greatest guitarists overall, then Hendrix
consistently rates number one or two.

http://guitarplayerzen.com/2008/03/0...s-of-all-time/

That Top 100 list is bullfeathers.

Joan Jett top one hundred quitarists of all time?

Pah...

On Aug 2, 8:41*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:36:59 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
On Aug 2, 8:23*pm, "Jim" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message

om...http://www.eisboch.com/ec.jpg

Eisboch

Was listening to a Jazz station a couple of days ago and they were doing an
all time great guitar countdown. Carlos Santana was 15th and Eric Clapton
ranked 4th. Who else would be high on the list?

Well, I am not a critic, but I like Jeff Beck, and of course a great
guitarist list would not be complete without Roy Clark..

Jazz guitarists moron. *:)

Come to think of it, Santana and Clapton hardly qualify as "jazz"
guitarists.

Maybe that's why I did not think we were limited to Jazz Guitarists,
or I just would have stopped at Jeff Beck... of course, I read the
whole post there shortpants..

Clapton maybe - bluesy kind of thing as "maybe" jazz.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:42:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:56:37 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:44 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote in ...
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
I suppose it is for photographers not interested in life as it is,
or for photographers whose composition and exposure skills are
minimal.
I like life as it is. I like to take photos that look as close to
what I saw as possible.
We recently came across an old, forgotten box of family photos.
One was my high school graduation "glamour" shot ..... you know,
the ones that were airbrushed back at the studio to remove a few
pimples, add a tinge of ruddy red to the cheeks and enhance the
color of the eyes.
In my case, I am kinda glad the photographer didn't simply
reproduce what he saw. It wasn't pretty.
Eisboch
Did you have a flattop?
Here's a photo of someone's 14-year-old granddaughter.
Do you think it has been photoshopped?
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...eous/diana.jpg
Actually it was photoshoped, using CS3. If you look at the exif data
you actually made 25 adjustments in photoshop.
I think she is a beautiful young woman, but the lighting is not
complementary to her or her skin tone. The photo looks flat like you
had the light directly behind you when you took the photo.
How come the picture disappeared?
Because the guy I wanted to see it saw it.
Harry, I noticed you did not disagree with the fact that you
photoshopped the file in CS3.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
shhhhh, he's busy deflecting.. The guy is a fraud, every last post..
I had to download the photo to run the EXIF data, so I still have it.

The killer though is the photo would have been a really nice portrait if
he did not have her facing directly into the window.
Would you mind putting it back up?
http://i339.photobucket.com/albums/n...ts/diana-1.jpg

It would have been a really nice portrait if the photographer knew
what he was doing.

That's freakin horrible.

Pretty girl with fine bone structure like that deserves much better.

PS - I would like Harry to realize I did credit him on the photo.

From the web site: Photo courtesy of Harry Krause. I would like to
thank Harry Krause for posting this photo of his granddaughter. If Harry
or any other photographer feels that this is a violation of their
copyright, please contract me and I will remove the photo from the web site.