wrote in message
ps.com...
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...



- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

Adolph Hitler would have gotten a nobel prize if he won the war.

That prize is more political than merit. Has been for at least 10-20 years
now.

Take a look at Gore's electric bill via Google. Does not practice what he
preaches. Hypocrite.

Global warming or not. Besides I like the idea of fishing in Minnesota in
January with sun screen. Why should Florida get all the fun.

Canuck57 wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...



- - -
A terrific honor for Al and the United States.
Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch
Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

Adolph Hitler would have gotten a nobel prize if he won the war.

That prize is more political than merit. Has been for at least 10-20 years
now.

Take a look at Gore's electric bill via Google. Does not practice what he
preaches. Hypocrite.

Global warming or not. Besides I like the idea of fishing in Minnesota in
January with sun screen. Why should Florida get all the fun.




Sour grapes. The nobel peace prize is the most prestigious award in the
world.

On Oct 12, 7:37 pm, "Canuck57" wrote:


But Gore is an opportunistic PoS. Lets hope we don't get a limp biscuit
"prez".


http://youtube.com/watch?v=jYyBZE0kBtE

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Canuck57 wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...



- - -
A terrific honor for Al and the United States.
Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is
unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch
Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

Adolph Hitler would have gotten a nobel prize if he won the war.

That prize is more political than merit. Has been for at least 10-20
years now.

Take a look at Gore's electric bill via Google. Does not practice what
he preaches. Hypocrite.

Global warming or not. Besides I like the idea of fishing in Minnesota
in January with sun screen. Why should Florida get all the fun.


Sour grapes. The nobel peace prize is the most prestigious award in the
world.

In my opinion, not with Arafat as a recipient.

"John H." wrote in message
...

Wrong. The earth's temperature has increased by one degree in the past
century. This is disputed by very, very few. Whether or not man caused
even
one-fiftieth of the one degree rise is the question. The next question is
what to do about it. Many on your side want to spend a lot of money making
Gore rich. Others want to make a lot of money by 'carbon offsets' (more
tree planting?).

I'll know the liberals are taking man's contribution seriously when Sen.
Robert Byrd says, "Let's build a nuclear plant in West Virginia!"

I don't dispute that even though last winter was cold where I live. Lets
hope they are right. I thought we had a high this summer, but turns out in
1937 and 2 other years before it, was warmer.

1) Is it so freaking bad?

2) My SUT and SUV melted Mars polar cap?

Give me a break. They can't predict weather for 3 days and we think they
know how this is going to affect us in 200 years? Lets not be naive. The
most bio diverse places on earth are tropical, and the least are on a polar
ice caps. Just a lot of wasted real-estate I say. Prehistoric times life
and vegetation peeked on the earth with ferns and dinosaurs on the north
slope of Alaska. You don't see 500,000 year old ice cores, because it has
melted before many times.

It is panic propelled by socialistic "sky is falling" eco-farts wanting
government money and prey on social panic. Otherwise for the populous to
keep their minds off of taxes, inflation, dumb wars and other issues.

Remember that carbon was once in the air that we burn today. Plants eat it,
and it isn't like cadmium, concentraighted lead, plastics and other man made
junk like PCBs.

D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Canuck57 wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...



- - -
A terrific honor for Al and the United States.
Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is
unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch
Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.
Adolph Hitler would have gotten a nobel prize if he won the war.

That prize is more political than merit. Has been for at least 10-20
years now.

Take a look at Gore's electric bill via Google. Does not practice what
he preaches. Hypocrite.

Global warming or not. Besides I like the idea of fishing in Minnesota
in January with sun screen. Why should Florida get all the fun.

Sour grapes. The nobel peace prize is the most prestigious award in the
world.

In my opinion, not with Arafat as a recipient.



Mistakes are made. Consider: George W. Bush as president of the United
States.

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:25:49 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:22:32 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:29:47 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 12, 9:00 am, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:53:37 -0400, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:34:44 -0400, HK wrote:

Global warming has quite a bit to do with boating. Weather, eh?

In particular for those with low transoms.

~~ that is just never going to get old ~~ :)

Unfortunately, neither are the failures of George W. Bush. I heard he
was about to be selected for the Forrest Gump Award until the sponsors
realized Bush had never served his country honorably in an overseas war.

Didn't the manufacturer of your Ranger go bankrupt? No wonder you
matched it up with an eTec?

I hear the eTec brand will be going national, as soon as the number of
stocking, selling dealers increases from three.

:}

All joking somewhat aside, if the sea level rises as fast as Gore says it
will, aren't you just a *little* bit worried that it might overflow that
low transom?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, the boat will float and ride at the same height whether in two
feet of water, or two hundred.

Thanks, bass, I was very concerned about Harry's boat. I'm glad you
explained that for both of us. Now our minds can be at rest.

BTW, what's a loogy? Did you mean to say 'BoogerPicker'?

It was kind of like cow tow - remember that one?

~~ snerk ~~

It was 'cow down'!!

Double ~~snerk~~

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:31:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

I wonder who said this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest audience I can,
and
hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge confiscatory advertising
rates,"

Michael Moore?


Close, but no.


Al (the world's got a fever) Gore?

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:50:44 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:31:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
groups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

I wonder who said this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest audience I can,
and
hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge confiscatory advertising
rates,"

Michael Moore?


Close, but no.

I thought we established this was Rush. It sure sounds like someone
who understands what "free" broadcasting is all about.
This is a guy who made millions "giving his show away for free".
The same is true of "free" TV and "free" internet services like Yahoo
and Google. You pay every time you buy something they advertise there
in higher prices. Of course Google et al is also a serious threat to
your privacy. If you are "logged in" or accept cookies your inbox is
certain to be stuffed with spam based on everything you ever looked at
on the web. They may also sell your search history to the highest
bidder. Certainly the government has free access to it.

All true, but his statement also explains what his mission is NOT, and his
most rabid devotees do not understand this.


You know a bunch of them, do you?

On 12 Oct 2007 11:46:01 -0700, wrote:

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...





On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, let's just take a straw poll here....

I will guarantee that at least two thirds of the conservatives that I
know and associate with are in pure denial that global warming is
real. There's been pages and pages of debate right here in rec.boats.

Wrong. The earth's temperature has increased by one degree in the past
century. This is disputed by very, very few. Whether or not man caused even
one-fiftieth of the one degree rise is the question. The next question is
what to do about it. Many on your side want to spend a lot of money making
Gore rich. Others want to make a lot of money by 'carbon offsets' (more
tree planting?).

I'll know the liberals are taking man's contribution seriously when Sen.
Robert Byrd says, "Let's build a nuclear plant in West Virginia!"