JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then
it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces
outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our
human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the
human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you
attribute
to human effect?
I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space
before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are
blind to them.



You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods?
Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.



Just for you Doug I will post it here.

Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in
the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle
then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces
outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our
human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the
human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you
attribute
to human effect?
I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to
the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space
before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it
would
be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you
are blind to them.



You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research
methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.

Just for you Doug I will post it here.

Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in
the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.


Silly child.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle
then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces
outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our
human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the
human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you
attribute
to human effect?
I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to
the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space
before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it
would
be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you
are blind to them.


You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research
methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.
Just for you Doug I will post it here.

Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in
the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.


Silly child.



If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth
then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to
change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming
is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in
the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.


This has been well studied since intuitively it appears obvious. However,
the best calculation for the sun's affect on earth warming due to radiation
levels over the 22 year sun cycle is a tenth of 1 degree F. It's a
non-event.

Eisboch

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any
scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all
of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and
the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but,
you are blind to them.


You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research
methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.
Just for you Doug I will post it here.

Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in
the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.


Silly child.

If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then
you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change
peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just
another tool to use in the class warfare struggle.


I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about the
sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL reason
why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming. You're
afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make behavioral
changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control you. If
George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human connection
was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of switching
parties. If your own kid found the proof, you'd disown him.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any
scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all
of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and
the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but,
you are blind to them.


You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research
methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.
Just for you Doug I will post it here.

Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in
the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.

Silly child.
If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then
you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change
peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just
another tool to use in the class warfare struggle.


I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about the
sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL reason
why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming. You're
afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make behavioral
changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control you. If
George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human connection
was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of switching
parties. If your own kid the proof, you'd disown him.



The human connection is nowhere near what you believe it is. Natural
events both localized to this planet and external to this planet are the
major cause of this particular episode global warming we are
experiencing. The real sad thing is that you humans have caused global
warming still have accepted that this isn't the first time that the
Earth has experienced global warming. All previous global warming events
precede humans use of fire.

George Bush has already crossed over to the Democrats side, he is a lame
duck and is out of touch with those who got him twice elected to the
presidency.

My eldest daughter has asked me on several occasions if I would vote for
her when she runs for POTUS and my response has always been that I would
if she was running as a Republican.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any
scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would
not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than
all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at
work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly
bodies but, you are blind to them.


You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research
methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.
Just for you Doug I will post it here.

Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing
in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.

Silly child.
If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth
then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to
change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming
is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle.


I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about
the sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL
reason why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming.
You're afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make
behavioral changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control
you. If George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human
connection was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of
switching parties. If your own kid the proof, you'd disown him.

The human connection is nowhere near what you believe it is.

But, you have no idea what I believe is the extent of the connection. You
keep using that combination of words, which is what makes this so much fun.
You're the poster boy for reading comprehension problems.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any
scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would
not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than
all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at
work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly
bodies but, you are blind to them.


You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research
methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.
Just for you Doug I will post it here.

Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing
in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it.

Silly child.
If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth
then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to
change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming
is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle.

I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about
the sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL
reason why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming.
You're afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make
behavioral changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control
you. If George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human
connection was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of
switching parties. If your own kid the proof, you'd disown him.
The human connection is nowhere near what you believe it is.

But, you have no idea what I believe is the extent of the connection. You
keep using that combination of words, which is what makes this so much fun.
You're the poster boy for reading comprehension problems.

Why don't you just state what you believe. Or, do you want to keep it to
yourself and use this as a point of argument? You really are a piece of
work Doug. You refuse to stand up and state what you believe because you
are afraid, yes afraid, that other people will disagree with you and you
will then have to defend your positon, rather than attacking everyone
else's.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...


Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put
up or shut up.


How would that work, anyway?

Simple, I've said all along that I'm not Kevin. I offered to prove that
point to anyone who would put up $5000 to John's charity. So far, the
blow hards are just that. Not willing to risk the $5000, which, if they
are so sure that I'm Kevin, wouldn't be a risk at all.

wrote:
I've also seen some Sat. and Sun posts. Maybe his kids let him have the
computer for a moment.

Grow up.