Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

? wrote:

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...



When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that:
1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans)

It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global
warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high
school
physics is aware of this fact.

Please quantify the HUMAN effect.

He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton
from
observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global
warming
equation.


This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple
idea: Do
we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this
discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except
those who
require the baby steps.

The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is
statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in
the whole global warming of planets issue.


Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above
sentence.

The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather
than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you
instead had your head up your ass.


Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up
the issue, huh?



The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin.

Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide
retort then.

I've also seen some Sat. and Sun posts. Maybe his kids let him have the
computer for a moment.


Bert Robbins wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

? wrote:

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...



When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that:
1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans)

It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global
warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high
school
physics is aware of this fact.

Please quantify the HUMAN effect.

He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton
from
observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global
warming
equation.


This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple
idea: Do
we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this
discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except
those who
require the baby steps.

The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is
statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in
the whole global warming of planets issue.


Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above
sentence.

The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather
than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you
instead had your head up your ass.


Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up
the issue, huh?



The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin.

Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide
retort then.

Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
om...

? wrote:

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
legroups.com...



When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that:
1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans)

It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global
warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school
physics is aware of this fact.

Please quantify the HUMAN effect.

He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from
observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming
equation.


This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do
we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this
discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who
require the baby steps.

The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is
statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in
the whole global warming of planets issue.


Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above
sentence.

The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather
than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you
instead had your head up your ass.


Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up
the issue, huh?



The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin.

Care to take the $5000 challenge to prove I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut
up.

Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute
to human effect?


I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before
the question so it's easy for you to see.

Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?

I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%

Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

Bert Robbins wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

? wrote:

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...



When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that:
1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans)

It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global
warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high
school
physics is aware of this fact.

Please quantify the HUMAN effect.

He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton
from
observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global
warming
equation.


This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple
idea: Do
we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this
discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except
those who
require the baby steps.

The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is
statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in
the whole global warming of planets issue.


Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above
sentence.

The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather
than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you
instead had your head up your ass.


Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up
the issue, huh?



The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin.

Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide
retort then.

Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put
up or shut up.

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...


Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put
up or shut up.


How would that work, anyway?

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute
to human effect?

I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%

Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.


You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you
are blind to them.

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

? wrote:

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...



When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that:
1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans)
It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global
warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high
school
physics is aware of this fact.
Please quantify the HUMAN effect.
He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton
from
observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global
warming
equation.

This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple
idea: Do
we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this
discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except
those who
require the baby steps.
The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is
statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in
the whole global warming of planets issue.

Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above
sentence.

The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather
than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you
instead had your head up your ass.

Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up
the issue, huh?


The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin.
Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide
retort then.

Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put
up or shut up.


Sure, you go first and if I believe you I might give you $5.00.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then
it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces
outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our
human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the
human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you
attribute
to human effect?

I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space
before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%

Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.


You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are
blind to them.



You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods?
Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS.

wrote in message
oups.com...
HA!

basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Yeah, kind of makes me feel bad for picking on someone with such
little
intellect.

So, you DO like to pick on people.
how brave and manly.......

I'm more brave and manly than you'll ever be. Grow up.


Better watch out or he will next threaten to kick your ass with his Karate
moves.