| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Ronald Reagan
"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message .net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... A fond farewell salute. Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's and 70's, Ronald Reagan made me proud again to be an American. A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no less costly to the US. Iran-Contra Bank deregulation and bailout He was a nice pig and a good speaker. You truly have no class. So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills that he caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven? As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that people avoid attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold. But I don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no class. This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has stated more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result being the lives of millions of people..... Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries. Not on a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that should an American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a Middle Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If the terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop. approx. 3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then Tehran is a goner. Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US citizens than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight against terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life any day of the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already. Keep that in mind...since it's their ultimate goal. I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!! IF they had the ability to use them on us. IF N.Y. city "gets hit". IF Chicago gets hit So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode Implode? every country that has an axe to grind with us? No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems. A life is a life. If you kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone who kills a child in this country. I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries have no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli soldiers. And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT Hey Hairball, the 9-11 Timeline | General | |||
| Failure to find banned Iraqi arms delays inspectors' report: press | General | |||
| does anybody here really know? | General | |||
Threaded Mode
