"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message

...

"basskisser" wrote in message
e.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

hlink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
gle.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oogle.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

...

"jps" wrote in message
et.com...

In article ,
says...

A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's

and

70's,
Ronald

Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no

less

costly
to

the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills

that he

caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that

people

avoid

attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.

But I

don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no

class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has

stated

more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result

being

the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.

Not

on

a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that

should an

American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a

Middle

Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If

the

terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.

approx.

3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then

Tehran is

a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US

citizens

than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight

against

terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life

any

day of

the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.

Keep

that

in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?


every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.



A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries

have

no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.


When a kid picks up a gun, or straps bombs to his back with the intent
to
kill and/or maim, he's no longer a "kid". He's now become a "target".




Poor logic on your part, fella. If your country is invaded, and it
offends you and you see a soldier of the occupying army, I suppose he
has become a target, eh?

Try harder.

Read back a little ways. I specifically mentioned kids strapping bombs on
their backs to kill Israeli soldiers. Are you justifying the Palestinian
attacks on Israel because the Palestinian's country was invaded?