"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's and
70's,
Ronald
Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no less
costly
to
the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills
that he
caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that people
avoid
attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.
But I
don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no
class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has stated
more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result being
the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries. Not
on
a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that
should an
American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a
Middle
Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If the
terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.
approx.
3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then
Tehran is
a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US
citizens
than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight
against
terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life any
day of
the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already. Keep
that
in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?

every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.


A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries have
no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's and
70's,
Ronald
Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no less
costly
to
the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills
that he
caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that people
avoid
attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.
But I
don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no
class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has stated
more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result being
the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries. Not
on
a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that
should an
American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a
Middle
Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If the
terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.
approx.
3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then
Tehran is
a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US
citizens
than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight
against
terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life any
day of
the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already. Keep
that
in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?

every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.


A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries have
no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.

"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's and
70's,
Ronald
Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no less
costly
to
the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills
that he
caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that people
avoid
attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.
But I
don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no
class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has stated
more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result being
the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries. Not
on
a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that
should an
American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a
Middle
Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If the
terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.
approx.
3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then
Tehran is
a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US
citizens
than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight
against
terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life any
day of
the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already. Keep
that
in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?

Yes, implode. or MUST it be EXPLODE an entire country, and it's
occupants to make you happy and gleeful?

every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.

If you don't think so, then why do you write otherwise here? Need
examples?

A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries have
no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

They are trying to protect their country. I guess in your ignorant
eyes, we should invade every country that tries to protect itself???

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's
and
70's,
Ronald
Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no
less
costly
to
the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills
that he
caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that
people
avoid
attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.
But I
don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no
class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has
stated
more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result
being
the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.
Not
on
a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that
should an
American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a
Middle
Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If
the
terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.
approx.
3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then
Tehran is
a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US
citizens
than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight
against
terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life
any
day of
the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.
Keep
that
in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?

Yes, implode. or MUST it be EXPLODE an entire country, and it's
occupants to make you happy and gleeful?

every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.

If you don't think so, then why do you write otherwise here? Need
examples?

A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries
have
no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

They are trying to protect their country. I guess in your ignorant
eyes,.......snip

Wow, now even body parts are ignorant? Yours must be full of them.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's
and
70's,
Ronald
Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no
less
costly
to
the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills
that he
caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that
people
avoid
attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.
But I
don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no
class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has
stated
more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result
being
the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.
Not
on
a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that
should an
American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a
Middle
Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If
the
terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.
approx.
3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then
Tehran is
a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US
citizens
than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight
against
terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life
any
day of
the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.
Keep
that
in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?

every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.


A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries
have
no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.

When a kid picks up a gun, or straps bombs to his back with the intent to
kill and/or maim, he's no longer a "kid". He's now become a "target".

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message

...

"basskisser" wrote in message
e.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

hlink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
gle.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oogle.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

...

"jps" wrote in message
et.com...

In article ,
says...

A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's

and

70's,
Ronald

Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no

less

costly
to

the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills

that he

caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that

people

avoid

attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.

But I

don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no

class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has

stated

more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result

being

the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.

Not

on

a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that

should an

American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a

Middle

Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If

the

terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.

approx.

3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then

Tehran is

a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US

citizens

than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight

against

terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life

any

day of

the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.

Keep

that

in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?


every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.



A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries

have

no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.


When a kid picks up a gun, or straps bombs to his back with the intent to
kill and/or maim, he's no longer a "kid". He's now become a "target".




Poor logic on your part, fella. If your country is invaded, and it
offends you and you see a soldier of the occupying army, I suppose he
has become a target, eh?

Try harder.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message

...

"basskisser" wrote in message
e.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

hlink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
gle.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oogle.com...

"NOYB" wrote in message

...

"jps" wrote in message
et.com...

In article ,
says...

A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's

and

70's,
Ronald

Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no

less

costly
to

the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills

that he

caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that

people

avoid

attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.

But I

don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no

class.

This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has

stated

more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result

being

the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.

Not

on

a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that

should an

American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a

Middle

Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If

the

terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.

approx.

3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then

Tehran is

a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US

citizens

than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight

against

terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life

any

day of

the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.

Keep

that

in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?


every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.



A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries

have

no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.


When a kid picks up a gun, or straps bombs to his back with the intent
to
kill and/or maim, he's no longer a "kid". He's now become a "target".




Poor logic on your part, fella. If your country is invaded, and it
offends you and you see a soldier of the occupying army, I suppose he
has become a target, eh?

Try harder.

Read back a little ways. I specifically mentioned kids strapping bombs on
their backs to kill Israeli soldiers. Are you justifying the Palestinian
attacks on Israel because the Palestinian's country was invaded?

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
e.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

...


"basskisser" wrote in message
gle.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

.earthlink.net...


"basskisser" wrote in message
oogle.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

hlink.net...


"basskisser" wrote in message
news:3c74f111.0406071025.1648c125@posting .google.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

...


"jps" wrote in message
anet.com...


In article ,
says...


A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's

and


70's,
Ronald


Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no

less


costly
to


the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills

that he


caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that

people


avoid


attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.

But I


don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no

class.


This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has

stated


more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result

being


the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.

Not


on


a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that

should an


American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a

Middle


Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon. If

the


terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.

approx.


3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then

Tehran is


a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US

citizens


than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight

against


terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life

any


day of


the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.

Keep


that


in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?



every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion problems.




A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other countries

have


no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.


When a kid picks up a gun, or straps bombs to his back with the intent

to

kill and/or maim, he's no longer a "kid". He's now become a "target".




Poor logic on your part, fella. If your country is invaded, and it
offends you and you see a soldier of the occupying army, I suppose he
has become a target, eh?

Try harder.


Read back a little ways. I specifically mentioned kids strapping bombs on
their backs to kill Israeli soldiers. Are you justifying the Palestinian
attacks on Israel because the Palestinian's country was invaded?





Not at all. There is no "Palestine."

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
e.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

...


"basskisser" wrote in message
gle.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

.earthlink.net...


"basskisser" wrote in message
oogle.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

hlink.net...


"basskisser" wrote in message
news:3c74f111.0406071025.1648c125@posting .google.com...


"NOYB" wrote in message

...


"jps" wrote in message
anet.com...


In article ,
says...


A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's

and


70's,
Ronald


Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no

less


costly
to


the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills

that he


caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that

people


avoid


attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.

But I


don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no

class.


This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has

stated


more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result

being


the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.

Not


on


a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that

should an


American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a

Middle


Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon.
If

the


terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.

approx.


3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then

Tehran is


a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US

citizens


than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight

against


terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life

any


day of


the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.

Keep


that


in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?



every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion
problems.




A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other
countries

have


no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.


When a kid picks up a gun, or straps bombs to his back with the intent

to

kill and/or maim, he's no longer a "kid". He's now become a "target".




Poor logic on your part, fella. If your country is invaded, and it
offends you and you see a soldier of the occupying army, I suppose he
has become a target, eh?

Try harder.


Read back a little ways. I specifically mentioned kids strapping bombs
on
their backs to kill Israeli soldiers. Are you justifying the Palestinian
attacks on Israel because the Palestinian's country was invaded?





Not at all. There is no "Palestine."

That's why I wrote "Palestinian's country". *What* they call it is not
important. The fact of the matter is that *they* think they have a country
which is being occupied by Israel.

So...
Are the Palestinian kids justified in strapping bombs to their backs to oust
the Israeli "occupiers"?

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


NOYB wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
gle.com...



"NOYB" wrote in message

...



"basskisser" wrote in message
oogle.com...



"NOYB" wrote in message

tl.earthlink.net...



"basskisser" wrote in message
news:3c74f111.0406080357.3c19a782@posting .google.com...



"NOYB" wrote in message

rthlink.net...



"basskisser" wrote in message
news:3c74f111.0406071025.1648c125@posti ng.google.com...



"NOYB" wrote in message

...



"jps" wrote in message
news:MPG.1b2bfe9ea55cc2e69898e0@news. seanet.com...



In article ,
says...



A fond farewell salute.

Having grown up in the 50's and having survived the 60's

and



70's,
Ronald



Reagan made me proud again to be an American.

A lot more benign than the current idiot in chief but no

less



costly
to



the US.

Iran-Contra
Bank deregulation and bailout

He was a nice pig and a good speaker.


You truly have no class.

So, do you think that, because he's dead, that all of the ills

that he



caused this country should be forgotten, or forgiven?

As Gould pointed out, social decorum usually dictates that

people



avoid



attacking the recently deceased at least until the body is cold.

But I



don't expect you to understand either...since you, too, have no

class.



This from a person that has NO compassion for human life, has

stated



more than once that we should nuke several countries, the result

being



the lives of millions of people.....

Actually, I advocated nuking strategic cities in several countries.

Not



on



a whim, mind you. We should tell the Islamic fundamentalists that

should an



American city be attacked by terrorists, a city of equal size in a

Middle



Eastern country will be immediately leveled by a nuclear weapon.

If

the



terrorists hit Chicago (pop. approx. 3 million), then Riyadh (pop.

approx.



3.5 million) gets leveled. If NYC gets hit (pop. 8 million), then

Tehran is



a goner.


Sometimes taking lives will save many more over the long run. Most
countries in the Middle East have a higher population of anti-US

citizens



than pro-US citizens...making those people our enemy in this fight

against



terrorism. I'd trade 10,000 of their lives for one American life

any



day of



the week. If they had nukes, they'd have used 'em on us already.

Keep



that



in mind...since it's their ultimate goal.

I LIKE it, you're learning something! IF they had nukes???!!!
IF they had the ability to use them on us.
IF N.Y. city "gets hit".
IF Chicago gets hit

So, you think that it would be a prudent act to go implode

Implode?




every
country that has an axe to grind with us?

No. I told you what I think. You have reading comprehesion

problems.




A life is a life. If you
kill a child in another country, then you are no better than someone
who kills a child in this country.

I guess that depends. It seems that the kids in those other

countries

have



no problem strapping explosives to themselves and blowing up Israeli
soldiers.

And neither to kids here, NOYB. It's called The U.S. Army.


When a kid picks up a gun, or straps bombs to his back with the intent

to


kill and/or maim, he's no longer a "kid". He's now become a "target".




Poor logic on your part, fella. If your country is invaded, and it
offends you and you see a soldier of the occupying army, I suppose he
has become a target, eh?

Try harder.


Read back a little ways. I specifically mentioned kids strapping bombs

on

their backs to kill Israeli soldiers. Are you justifying the Palestinian
attacks on Israel because the Palestinian's country was invaded?





Not at all. There is no "Palestine."


That's why I wrote "Palestinian's country". *What* they call it is not
important. The fact of the matter is that *they* think they have a country
which is being occupied by Israel.

So...
Are the Palestinian kids justified in strapping bombs to their backs to oust
the Israeli "occupiers"?





It depends. The so-called Palestinians believe some of what they occupy
is their country, and it may turn out that way someday. If the bomb
carriers consider themselves freedom fighters, and restrict their
attacks to strictly military targers, then the whole matter gets a bit
hazy.

Warmaking is not so neat and clean. We've killed thousands of
non-combatant Iraqis and Afghanis recently, and we torture prisoners. We
no longer occupy the moral high ground.