BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   OT what JimH does for a living (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/45585-ot-what-jimh-does-living.html)

*JimH* June 30th 05 01:23 AM


wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH moped:


You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took
the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.




Incidentally, "you are a stalker" and "you are pathetic" fall into the
category of those personal remarks you deny making.


Guilty as charged, and you will see more of this from me from this point on.
You have proved yourself to be a pathetic piece of crap Chuckie and deserve
no respect.




[email protected] June 30th 05 01:24 AM



*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH?


Yes, you did. You are a worthless piece of **** Chuck. You now join Harry
Krause on the list of internet stalkers of rec.boats.


Oh, Look. "You are a worhtless piece of ****" would also fall into that
category of personal comments you claim you never make.


*JimH* June 30th 05 01:27 AM


wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH?


Yes, you did. You are a worthless piece of **** Chuck. You now join
Harry
Krause on the list of internet stalkers of rec.boats.


Oh, Look. "You are a worhtless piece of ****" would also fall into that
category of personal comments you claim you never make.


Yep, guilty as charged. I had not, however, made personal attacks or
personal comments about you prior to your internet stalking of me this
morning, even though you claimed I did (but could never offer proof).

And you will see more of the same comments from this point on as you are,
indeed, a worthless piece of crap.



[email protected] June 30th 05 01:37 AM

JimH moped:


Guilty as charged, and you will see more of this from me from this point on.
You have proved yourself to be a pathetic piece of crap Chuckie and deserve
no respect.



Excellent. We are all better defined by what we say about others than
we are
by what we say about ourselves. Hang it out for all the world to see,
JimH. Stand up and be proud of exactly who and what you are.
See if you can continue to out-Krause Krause. It will be refreshing to
have you drop the pretense of outraged innocence and take credit for an
aggressive offense. I'm puzzled about how you intend to do "more" from
this point on. Will you post *two* insults, rather than only one, in
response to everything I ever say? This will prove most interesting.

"Swarm and Destroy"?
Too bad that your perpetual anger will only destroy yourself.

I'd be *very* alarmed, given your demonstrated value system, if I had
your respect.


Don White June 30th 05 01:41 AM

wrote:


Golly and gee whiz, JimH.

Let's take a deep breath for a minute and evaluate your stalking
charges.

You placed an advertisement for a Moped (being retired from the "swarm
and destroy" moped army) on a publicly accessible site on the internet,
and furnished a photo that shows a corner of your front porch and some
brown patches on your front lawn as well as the used Moped in question.
You then characterize anybody who reports viewing your publicly
displayed advertisement or calls the attention of others to the ad as a
"stalker"?? Get thou real.

Here's a newsflash for you, JimH. A stalker would be somebody who digs
up and publicizes information that you haven't already publicly
divulged. If you put an aerial photo of your house on the internet, or
a photo of your moped, you surrender your expectation of privacy
regarding the size and location of your home or your membership in the
"Swarm and Destroy" Moped Army. That may be a more sophisticated
concept than your perpetual anger will allow you to understand, but you
might reconsider your definition of "stalking".


Do you think JimH could mobilize and have his entire 'swarm & destroy
army' put..put out to the West Coast? It could be like Marlon Brando in
the 'Wild Ones' all over again.

Don White June 30th 05 01:52 AM

Yo Ho wrote:
What was the reason for publishing this personal information?


wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH moped:


You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took
the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.


Perhaps your perpetual anger will eventually subside to the point where
you will concede that the link to the ad you placed on the internet
does *not* contain your address and phone number as you claim above.
Anybody who clicked on the link can see very clearly that you are
making up crap, again, to try an bolster yet another of your weak
positions. Isn't that just a general insult to the intelligence of
anybody reading your post, or is it that you realize the group you are
hoping to appeal to has a very low threshold for credibilty?

Incidentally, "you are a stalker" and "you are pathetic" fall into the
category of those personal remarks you deny making.




I've looked at the Moped ad a couple of times. Where is the phone number
and street address? I may want to buy that puppy.

[email protected] June 30th 05 01:52 AM


JimH moped:


More proof that Harry Krause is indeed an internet stalker. Chuck Gould
proved it today to everyone by finding then posting my address and phone
number here.


Your perpetual anger has made you delusional. Perhaps you hope somebody
too lazy to follow the link will believe your repeated lie that the
photoclassified ad contained your address and phone number. It did not.
Your repeated lie that it did will not somehow insert that data into
your ad. Anybody willing to click on the link will see which of our two
conflicting statements is full of crap.
Too bad for your crediblity, or whatever is left.


[email protected] June 30th 05 02:05 AM



Yo Ho wrote:
What was the reason for publishing this personal information?



I can only guess, as the information was acutally published by JimH.
I merely provided a link to material that JimH had already, publicly,
disclosed.

It appears that it was published to solicit buyers for a used moped.


[email protected] June 30th 05 02:11 AM


Don White wrote


I've looked at the Moped ad a couple of times. Where is the phone number
and street address? I may want to buy that puppy.


Despite the BS claims and abused wailing of JimH and his sidekick,
Smithers, the phone number and street address *do not* appear in the ad
JimH posted on the internet.

You'll have to contact JimH by email or through the NG. Somehow, I
think he'd be willing to make you a particularly "special" deal. :-)


[email protected] June 30th 05 02:18 AM



Yo Ho wrote:
Harry,
I own an art studio.



Hmm.

Let's see here.

You change your handle more often than most folks do underwear.
You suggest that somebody should put my name and phone number in a "sex
ad".
You claim to own an "art" studio?

Does one need to be over 21 to go in and see the "artists"? :-)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com