On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:18:20 -0400, "Yo Ho" wrote:

Why would I want to email you? Doesn't make any sense at all.


He likes sending back-channels, but if you use mailwasher you can have it
bounced back at him from the ISP.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:21:25 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Why would I want to email you? Doesn't make any sense at all.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

I've not posted your name, address, phone number, or SSN, either.


Yes, but if you knew it I am sure you would have. I know you phone
numbers, but have keep them off the internet..

If you knew what I know about you, you'd have a heart attack, fella.
It's only my good nature...



More proof that Harry Krause is indeed an internet stalker. Chuck Gould
proved it today to everyone by finding then posting my address and phone
number here.

Why the need to collect personal data on folks here Krause? Do you get your
jollies from it?


Now Krause is posting his hate-mail on a Chesapeake Bay fishing forum. Getting
caught constantly has got to be a bitch!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

JimH "moped", (sorry, couldn't resist that one!)


Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the point
of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has now
joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.

How sad it must be to have to live as Harry Krause......a man who has to
fabricate stories in a remote boating NG about his boat, his house, his
wife, her job and now fishing stories.

Sad.


Golly and gee whiz, JimH.

Let's take a deep breath for a minute and evaluate your stalking
charges.

You placed an advertisement for a Moped (being retired from the "swarm
and destroy" moped army) on a publicly accessible site on the internet,
and furnished a photo that shows a corner of your front porch and some
brown patches on your front lawn as well as the used Moped in question.
You then characterize anybody who reports viewing your publicly
displayed advertisement or calls the attention of others to the ad as a
"stalker"?? Get thou real.

Here's a newsflash for you, JimH. A stalker would be somebody who digs
up and publicizes information that you haven't already publicly
divulged. If you put an aerial photo of your house on the internet, or
a photo of your moped, you surrender your expectation of privacy
regarding the size and location of your home or your membership in the
"Swarm and Destroy" Moped Army. That may be a more sophisticated
concept than your perpetual anger will allow you to understand, but you
might reconsider your definition of "stalking".

wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH "moped", (sorry, couldn't resist that one!)


Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the
point
of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has now
joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.

How sad it must be to have to live as Harry Krause......a man who has to
fabricate stories in a remote boating NG about his boat, his house, his
wife, her job and now fishing stories.

Sad.


Golly and gee whiz, JimH.

snip

You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.

Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH? This is, of course, after being forced to
admit that your earlier charge (publishing a phone number) was totally
fabricated BS.

I provided a link to a photoclassified ad on the "Swarn and Destroy
Moped Army" website. Do you consider the photo of the brown spots on
Jim's lawn and the corner of his front porch "home information"? Even
if it is, JimH is the party who placed it on a publicly accessible site
on the internet, not I.

wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH?

Yes, you did. You are a worthless piece of **** Chuck. You now join Harry
Krause on the list of internet stalkers of rec.boats.

Chuck,
I hope people give you as much respect as you deserve.


wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH? This is, of course, after being forced to
admit that your earlier charge (publishing a phone number) was totally
fabricated BS.

I provided a link to a photoclassified ad on the "Swarn and Destroy
Moped Army" website. Do you consider the photo of the brown spots on
Jim's lawn and the corner of his front porch "home information"? Even
if it is, JimH is the party who placed it on a publicly accessible site
on the internet, not I.

Which is none. Chuck Gould is an internet stalking piece of garbage. He
proved that today.


"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Chuck,
I hope people give you as much respect as you deserve.

JimH moped:


You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.

Perhaps your perpetual anger will eventually subside to the point where
you will concede that the link to the ad you placed on the internet
does *not* contain your address and phone number as you claim above.
Anybody who clicked on the link can see very clearly that you are
making up crap, again, to try an bolster yet another of your weak
positions. Isn't that just a general insult to the intelligence of
anybody reading your post, or is it that you realize the group you are
hoping to appeal to has a very low threshold for credibilty?

Incidentally, "you are a stalker" and "you are pathetic" fall into the
category of those personal remarks you deny making.

What was the reason for publishing this personal information?


wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH moped:


You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took
the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.

Perhaps your perpetual anger will eventually subside to the point where
you will concede that the link to the ad you placed on the internet
does *not* contain your address and phone number as you claim above.
Anybody who clicked on the link can see very clearly that you are
making up crap, again, to try an bolster yet another of your weak
positions. Isn't that just a general insult to the intelligence of
anybody reading your post, or is it that you realize the group you are
hoping to appeal to has a very low threshold for credibilty?

Incidentally, "you are a stalker" and "you are pathetic" fall into the
category of those personal remarks you deny making.