On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:44:10 -0400, *JimH* wrote:


Not possible? Go check again because I "totally" edited it.

Here is the original link that you posted....you know the one that had my
name, address and phone number in it.

http://www.mopedarmy.com/resources/mod/boatnut/

I await your apology for stalking me and then posting personal information
about me here, including my address and phone number.


You know, Jim, this is the internet. That web page has been cached as it
was originally written. I don't see any need to post the link, do you?

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:44:10 -0400, *JimH* wrote:


Not possible? Go check again because I "totally" edited it.

Here is the original link that you posted....you know the one that had my
name, address and phone number in it.

http://www.mopedarmy.com/resources/mod/boatnut/

I await your apology for stalking me and then posting personal
information
about me here, including my address and phone number.


You know, Jim, this is the internet. That web page has been cached as it
was originally written. I don't see any need to post the link, do you?

Sure, to show the truth.

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:19:07 -0400, *JimH* wrote:


Sure, to show the truth.

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache...+hertvik&hl=en

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
What was your purpose of publishing a 2 yr old ad?


Careful YO HO, you'll blow hell out of JimH's daily story. You rather
obviously saw the ad when the last time JimH had logged on was in 2003.
When pressed yesterday, you backed off your claim that the ad you saw
had JimH's home phone number and you never mentioned his home address.
The latest
version of the truth from Ohio is that the "ad had my home address and
phone number when Gould put up the link, but I went in and edited them
off".
JimH has logged on again since you saw the ad from 2003, and his claim
is now that he edited or erased his home address and phone number from
the ad. I'm going to be fascinated to learn how his name and home
address ever appeared (as he falsely claims) on a standardized form
with *no* category for either item.




Not possible? Go check again because I "totally" edited it.

Here is the original link that you posted....you know the one that had my
name, address and phone number in it.

http://www.mopedarmy.com/resources/mod/boatnut/

I await your apology for stalking me and then posting personal information
about me here, including my address and phone number.


But you have screwed yourself, JimH. Don't you realize that? The link
now goes to the ad as you claim to have changed it on June 29. How does
that establish your lie that the ad from 2003 contained your address
and phone number in the comments section. You, I, and everybody else
who saw that ad from 2003 know that it did not.

You had two possibilities to make your case: 1) If your home address
and phone number were really in the initial ad and had *already* been
revealed, as you falsely claim, you would have had nothing to lose by
leaving the ad alone and saying "Look in the comments section,
dip****". You did not.

2) You could have outed your own home address and phone number when you
logged onto the ad yesterday by adding them to the comments section and
then you could have falsely claimed they had been there all along. Too
late! You did not. Good grief, not only are you not subtle, but not the
least bit clever, either.

You have blown the only two chances that I could see where you would
have been able to make your case. All your fellow travelers who logged
onto that ad
yesterday, (such as Smithers who acknowledges that he saw the 2003
version), would have been on my butt like a case of acne each time I
pointed out that the ad never contained your home address and phone
number if it had been in the "comments" section.

I suppose you *have* taken the only (very weak) course of action open
to you when confronted with the truth. Change the ad as it existed, and
then hope to
turn this into a "did-so/ did-not" discussion after the actual evidence
was destroyed. Wow. This whole episode is so very revealing.

I will not apologize for doing something that I did not do.

Will you apologize for piling lie, upon lie, upon lie, upon lie?

wrote in message
oups.com...


But you have screwed yourself, JimH. Don't you realize that? The link
now goes to the ad as you claim to have changed it on June 29. How does
that establish your lie that the ad from 2003 contained your address
and phone number in the comments section. You, I, and everybody else
who saw that ad from 2003 know that it did not.

I will not apologize for doing something that I did not do.

Will you apologize for piling lie, upon lie, upon lie, upon lie?


Yes. I got caught up in this and I thought I had no other way out. I made
a mistake accusing you , although at the time I did think the ad contained
that information. I dug myself deeper and deeper and made you the
scapegoat.

I am ashamed of what I did and have lost all credibility here for doing it.
I should have known better after I discovered I was initially wrong.

I apologize Chuck. I have no excuse.

My wife the doctor is back in school part-time, getting, of all things,
a doctorate. In a couple of years, I'll either have to address her as
Doctor Doctor or Major Major.


Just call me...Yossarian.


And you'll still be a jail guard.


--
Harry Krause
- -
Conservatives tell us that if the workers want to share profits, it is
communism, but if management wants to share profits, it is a bonus.


"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...

Harry,
Why do you think social worker is not a noble enough profession for your
wife?

Didn't you say your wife was a Dr. Dr.?

I thought you said she had a MD with a PHD? I thought that was why you
were
able to provide rec.boats with a medical expert to diagnose the current
mental health of the regulars in rec.boats.

I think a social worker is a noble profession, but I am sure your wife
would
be upset if she knew you did not.



http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...bda8?dmode=sou
rce&hl=en



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Harry,
You are correct, you said you wife (the social worker) was a MD with
a
PHD.



Wrong again, scheisskopf.



--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

I just skimmed over the ad, so I would not bet the farm if he had his
address, but as you stated with the info available on the web site 90% of
those who read rec.boats could find it in 10 secs.

So what was the purpose of posting the 2 yr old ad in here?


wrote in message
ups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
What was your purpose of publishing a 2 yr old ad?


Careful YO HO, you'll blow hell out of JimH's daily story. You rather
obviously saw the ad when the last time JimH had logged on was in 2003.
When pressed yesterday, you backed off your claim that the ad you saw
had JimH's home phone number and you never mentioned his home address.
The latest
version of the truth from Ohio is that the "ad had my home address and
phone number when Gould put up the link, but I went in and edited them
off".
JimH has logged on again since you saw the ad from 2003, and his claim
is now that he edited or erased his home address and phone number from
the ad. I'm going to be fascinated to learn how his name and home
address ever appeared (as he falsely claims) on a standardized form
with *no* category for either item.








wrote in message
oups.com...




More proof that Harry Krause is indeed an internet stalker. Chuck
Gould
proved it today to everyone by finding then posting my address and
phone
number here.


Yet another blatant lie from the Moped warrior. Nobody has posted your
address and phone number here. Have you no regard for the truth at all?
How dare you call someone else immoral?

Yo Ho wrote:
I just skimmed over the ad, so I would not bet the farm if he had his
address, but as you stated with the info available on the web site 90% of
those who read rec.boats could find it in 10 secs.

So what was the purpose of posting the 2 yr old ad in here?


After I expressed a (slight- that's all I could really muster)
displeasure that somebody posted a photo to flame JimH, he jumped in to
attack me for applauding and condoning the practice. See the top of
this ridiculously long thread.

If'm I'm going to get the blame, I may as well have the game. I posted
a link to a photo that JimH *himself* had published on the internet,
where he self-identified as a member of the Swarm and Destroy Moped
Army. That's far more humorous than a photo that really has no
connection to JimH except for a slanderous allegation.

Jim's full name and the city of his residence have been common
knowledge here almost forever. Harry commonly addresses JimH with his
last name, and JimH confirms that by protesting the use of it. There
was no new information in that ad. His street address and his phone
number were not there. Posters earlier in this same thread yesterday
confirmed that his street address and phone number were not in the ad.

If you have been here long enough, you will remember when JimH's name,
phone number, and home address actually *did* appear in rec.boats. JimH
had placed a classified ad for the Maxum he was selling when he got out
of boating, on the rec.boats.marketplace website. That ad, unlike the
moped ad, contained his phone number and street address. If I recall
correctly, JimH was disappointed with the number of hits he was getting
from the rec.boats.marketplace site (all four people there had seen his
boat and decided not to call) and he linked the ad into rec.boats to
see about stirring up some additional response.
I could be hazy on the detail about how the ad actually got posted here
and wouldn't "bet the farm" either after these several years, but
that's as I remember it and I know for a fact the ad had his address
and phone number listed.

So anybody who wants to contact JimH at his home address or phone
number has several options. There are free, public websites where even
so-called "unlisted" phone numbers are available in a matter of
seconds. Some of them will disclose the street address of the
residence, and more than a few will print out a map and driving
directions to that location- on a turn by turn basis- from anywhere in
the country. This isn't news to anybody who has owned a computer for
more than a week. I could call JimH, send him some mail, or drive to
his house for a visit if I so desired. Sure as heck, I don't desire and
I wouldn't expect to be welcomed. Nor do I think it important or
appropriate to "out" this information, and it wouldn't even be useful
as it is so easily and publicly available to anybody who might want it.

Chuck,

I have mentioned it before and I will say it again. This is exactly the
reason why internet security people recommend you keep your personal info
off of NG's. Someone who wanted to screw someone could do it very easy.

Harry has always used any personal info in a negative manner. Name, address
and telephone numbers in the wrong hands can be dangerous.





wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
I just skimmed over the ad, so I would not bet the farm if he had his
address, but as you stated with the info available on the web site 90% of
those who read rec.boats could find it in 10 secs.

So what was the purpose of posting the 2 yr old ad in here?


After I expressed a (slight- that's all I could really muster)
displeasure that somebody posted a photo to flame JimH, he jumped in to
attack me for applauding and condoning the practice. See the top of
this ridiculously long thread.

If'm I'm going to get the blame, I may as well have the game. I posted
a link to a photo that JimH *himself* had published on the internet,
where he self-identified as a member of the Swarm and Destroy Moped
Army. That's far more humorous than a photo that really has no
connection to JimH except for a slanderous allegation.

Jim's full name and the city of his residence have been common
knowledge here almost forever. Harry commonly addresses JimH with his
last name, and JimH confirms that by protesting the use of it. There
was no new information in that ad. His street address and his phone
number were not there. Posters earlier in this same thread yesterday
confirmed that his street address and phone number were not in the ad.

If you have been here long enough, you will remember when JimH's name,
phone number, and home address actually *did* appear in rec.boats. JimH
had placed a classified ad for the Maxum he was selling when he got out
of boating, on the rec.boats.marketplace website. That ad, unlike the
moped ad, contained his phone number and street address. If I recall
correctly, JimH was disappointed with the number of hits he was getting
from the rec.boats.marketplace site (all four people there had seen his
boat and decided not to call) and he linked the ad into rec.boats to
see about stirring up some additional response.
I could be hazy on the detail about how the ad actually got posted here
and wouldn't "bet the farm" either after these several years, but
that's as I remember it and I know for a fact the ad had his address
and phone number listed.

So anybody who wants to contact JimH at his home address or phone
number has several options. There are free, public websites where even
so-called "unlisted" phone numbers are available in a matter of
seconds. Some of them will disclose the street address of the
residence, and more than a few will print out a map and driving
directions to that location- on a turn by turn basis- from anywhere in
the country. This isn't news to anybody who has owned a computer for
more than a week. I could call JimH, send him some mail, or drive to
his house for a visit if I so desired. Sure as heck, I don't desire and
I wouldn't expect to be welcomed. Nor do I think it important or
appropriate to "out" this information, and it wouldn't even be useful
as it is so easily and publicly available to anybody who might want it.