Bull****. My address and phone number was in the ad and you know it. After
you posted it, I went back and edited the ad to remove that information. I
also killed the email address and it is no longer active. I am also trying
to get the ad removed from that site entirely.

*You* knew the ad contained that personal information about me yet you chose
to post it here. *You* deliberately sought it out and posted it here.

Yes, you are an internet stalker and lack morals and ethics.

That, Mr. Hertvik, is *another phucking lie!*

You did not go back and "edit" the ad. There was no address and phone
number on the ad when I posted the link. Look very carefully: Is there
even a place on the advertising form for an address and phone number? I
don't remember one. After your "edit", does the ad still say you
haven't logged on since 2003? What a pathetic and obviously false
claim. You certainly are desperate to try and salvage some credibility.

Wow. You come so clearly into focus with this latest claim. Look up
pathological. You get caught in one lie, ("Gould revealed my address
and phone number") and you simply try to cover with another, ("It
doesn't show in the ad now because I went back and edited it") and then
another?, and then another?
(I could edit the ad but they wouldn't let me delete it!)?

I wouldn't have posted the link if it had contained your address and
phone number.

It's so inconsistent for you to be so paranoid that somebody will be
able to connect your malicious behavior on the net with your actual
identity that you go back and "kill" an email address you previously
published and your new false, fictitious, blatant lie that the ad
originally contained your address and phone number. Nobody as nervous
about publishing their name and address as you seem to be would have
ever put it an ad. We both know it wasn't there. We both know that it
isn't until a day later, and a string of unanswerable refutations of
your false claim that I disclosed your address and phone number, that
this new story that you "edited" the ad has appeared.


But be well aware that I could have revealed your address had I wanted
to.
Ever hear the limerick about a guy from "(insert word here)" who "went
to sea in a (insert word here)"? Yeah, I know your address, phone
number, 10-digit zip code, etc. It's publicly available on the internet
by typing in a very common web address, and I'll bet 90% of the people
reading this NG know exactly where to go to find it. Even so, I choose
to keep this information confidential, but if you want to continue to
lie that I have disclosed it then there will certainly be no reason for
me to continue doing so. This entire exercise began after I expressed
some disapproval that another poster was using a funny photo to flame
you and you responded by furiously charging me with endorsing the use
of the photo for that purpose.

See, Jim......if I'm going to get the blame I might as well have the
game.
You still want to insist that I revealed your address and phone number?
I can do so with just a few keystrokes. It's up to you. I'm willing to
help your fantasies become reality, even if it's in arrears.

wrote in message
oups.com...



Bull****. My address and phone number was in the ad and you know it.
After
you posted it, I went back and edited the ad to remove that information.
I
also killed the email address and it is no longer active. I am also
trying
to get the ad removed from that site entirely.

*You* knew the ad contained that personal information about me yet you
chose
to post it here. *You* deliberately sought it out and posted it here.

Yes, you are an internet stalker and lack morals and ethics.

That, Mr. Hert, is *another phucking lie!*


Bull****, and you know better. I removed the address and phone number after
you had the balls to post it here. And soon the entire ad will be removed.

Others saw the address and phone number too before I removed it.

Stop the spin Chuck. You were caught as an internet stalker and are now no
better than Harry Krause, the king of internet stalking.

"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...

Harry,
Why do you think social worker is not a noble enough profession for your
wife?

Didn't you say your wife was a Dr. Dr.?

I thought you said she had a MD with a PHD? I thought that was why you
were
able to provide rec.boats with a medical expert to diagnose the current
mental health of the regulars in rec.boats.

I think a social worker is a noble profession, but I am sure your wife
would
be upset if she knew you did not.



http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...bda8?dmode=sou
rce&hl=en



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Harry,
You are correct, you said you wife (the social worker) was a MD with a
PHD.



Wrong again, scheisskopf.



--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Don White wrote:
wrote:



Looks like the Moped warrior sent out for reinforcements. :-)


Looks like they plan to 'Smither' you into submission. Don't you feel a
slimy feeling developing on your skin?

Actually I feel like I've driven poor JimH to the brink of insanity.
That's too bad.

Did you see his latest claim, that the ad originally contained his home
address and phone number when I posted the link and that the only
reason it isn't there now is because he went back and "edited" it?

Poor deluded JimH. How will he ever explain that the website form
doesn't even *offer* a line upon which one could enter a home address
or phone number? Perhaps he'll claim that he forced the Swarm and
Destroy Moped Army website to reengineer their entire website, in
arrears, to bolster his blatant lie that my link revealed his home
address and phone number.

One of the problems with pathological liars is that when they get
caught they get desperate. When they get desperate they get careless.
When they get careless, they claim to have "edited" information off a
form that doesn't even have a blank to carry that information in the
first place.

With the claim that he "edited" his home address and phone number,
(from a form with no capacity to show home address and phone number),
JimH has revealed who and what he is for all who care to see it. What a
joke that he
yaks away at others about morals.

wrote in message
oups.com...


Don White wrote:
wrote:



Looks like the Moped warrior sent out for reinforcements. :-)


Looks like they plan to 'Smither' you into submission. Don't you feel a
slimy feeling developing on your skin?

Actually I feel like I've driven poor JimH to the brink of insanity.
That's too bad.

Did you see his latest claim, that the ad originally contained his home
address and phone number when I posted the link and that the only
reason it isn't there now is because he went back and "edited" it?

Which I did, and you know it as do the others who saw my address and phone
number in the ad shortly after you posted it.

Now go ahead and start bashing me and spinning the story. That is, the
thing to do when cornered.

Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
What was your purpose of publishing a 2 yr old ad?


Careful YO HO, you'll blow hell out of JimH's daily story. You rather
obviously saw the ad when the last time JimH had logged on was in 2003.
When pressed yesterday, you backed off your claim that the ad you saw
had JimH's home phone number and you never mentioned his home address.
The latest
version of the truth from Ohio is that the "ad had my home address and
phone number when Gould put up the link, but I went in and edited them
off".
JimH has logged on again since you saw the ad from 2003, and his claim
is now that he edited or erased his home address and phone number from
the ad. I'm going to be fascinated to learn how his name and home
address ever appeared (as he falsely claims) on a standardized form
with *no* category for either item.








wrote in message
oups.com...




More proof that Harry Krause is indeed an internet stalker. Chuck Gould
proved it today to everyone by finding then posting my address and phone
number here.


Yet another blatant lie from the Moped warrior. Nobody has posted your
address and phone number here. Have you no regard for the truth at all?
How dare you call someone else immoral?

wrote in message
ups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
What was your purpose of publishing a 2 yr old ad?


Careful YO HO, you'll blow hell out of JimH's daily story. You rather
obviously saw the ad when the last time JimH had logged on was in 2003.
When pressed yesterday, you backed off your claim that the ad you saw
had JimH's home phone number and you never mentioned his home address.
The latest
version of the truth from Ohio is that the "ad had my home address and
phone number when Gould put up the link, but I went in and edited them
off".
JimH has logged on again since you saw the ad from 2003, and his claim
is now that he edited or erased his home address and phone number from
the ad. I'm going to be fascinated to learn how his name and home
address ever appeared (as he falsely claims) on a standardized form
with *no* category for either item.




Bull****.

Name, email address, suject, attachment, comments. Those are the fields.
Address and phone number were in the comments section.

You know what you did. Too bad you are not man enough to admit it.

wrote in message
ups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
What was your purpose of publishing a 2 yr old ad?


Careful YO HO, you'll blow hell out of JimH's daily story. You rather
obviously saw the ad when the last time JimH had logged on was in 2003.
When pressed yesterday, you backed off your claim that the ad you saw
had JimH's home phone number and you never mentioned his home address.
The latest
version of the truth from Ohio is that the "ad had my home address and
phone number when Gould put up the link, but I went in and edited them
off".
JimH has logged on again since you saw the ad from 2003, and his claim
is now that he edited or erased his home address and phone number from
the ad. I'm going to be fascinated to learn how his name and home
address ever appeared (as he falsely claims) on a standardized form
with *no* category for either item.




Not possible? Go check again because I "totally" edited it.

Here is the original link that you posted....you know the one that had my
name, address and phone number in it.

http://www.mopedarmy.com/resources/mod/boatnut/

I await your apology for stalking me and then posting personal information
about me here, including my address and phone number.

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
What was your purpose of publishing a 2 yr old ad?


Careful YO HO, you'll blow hell out of JimH's daily story. You rather
obviously saw the ad when the last time JimH had logged on was in 2003.
When pressed yesterday, you backed off your claim that the ad you saw
had JimH's home phone number and you never mentioned his home address.
The latest
version of the truth from Ohio is that the "ad had my home address and
phone number when Gould put up the link, but I went in and edited them
off".
JimH has logged on again since you saw the ad from 2003, and his claim
is now that he edited or erased his home address and phone number from
the ad. I'm going to be fascinated to learn how his name and home
address ever appeared (as he falsely claims) on a standardized form
with *no* category for either item.




Bull****.

Name, email address, suject, attachment, comments. Those are the fields.
Address and phone number were in the comments section.

You know what you did. Too bad you are not man enough to admit it.


Too late, JimH. Many, many people saw your ad when your last log-on was
in 2003. Those who did know that the comments section contained
information that it was your son's moped and that it had 1100 miles on
it. Those who did know that it did *not* contain your home address and
phone number. Piling lie upon lie upon lie is simply digging you in
deeper.

"The comments section" indeed. How very predictable and pathological of
you.
Consider admitting that you lied- it would be easier than digging
yourself ever deeper.

Ask yourself: How believable would it even be for a guy who is
obviously frantic that his home address and phone number be kept off
the internet
to voluntarily offer that information in the comment section of a form
that doesn't ask for it? Not only are you proving yourself a liar, but
you are reproving it again, and again, and again, and again.

I feel so sorry for you in your desperation that I'm halfway inclined
to out
your home address and phone number now and vindicate your
claims.......but I'd be sorry for that in the future so I won't. You,
however, have made your bed with this new round of lies that the ad as
originally linked carried your name and phone number and that you
"erased" them (long after) I posted a link to your classified ad. You
are nothing more than a sociopathic liar.
Even you can't really believe your line of BS on this thing, and
challenging my "manhood" is a very weak dodge.

Boating related questions:
What sort of fire extinguisher do you recommend for pants?
How would you extract a boat tangled in telephone wires?

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
What was your purpose of publishing a 2 yr old ad?


Careful YO HO, you'll blow hell out of JimH's daily story. You rather
obviously saw the ad when the last time JimH had logged on was in 2003.
When pressed yesterday, you backed off your claim that the ad you saw
had JimH's home phone number and you never mentioned his home address.
The latest
version of the truth from Ohio is that the "ad had my home address and
phone number when Gould put up the link, but I went in and edited them
off".
JimH has logged on again since you saw the ad from 2003, and his claim
is now that he edited or erased his home address and phone number from
the ad. I'm going to be fascinated to learn how his name and home
address ever appeared (as he falsely claims) on a standardized form
with *no* category for either item.




Bull****.

Name, email address, suject, attachment, comments. Those are the fields.
Address and phone number were in the comments section.

You know what you did. Too bad you are not man enough to admit it.


Too late, JimH. Many, many people saw your ad when your last log-on was
in 2003. Those who did know that the comments section contained
information that it was your son's moped and that it had 1100 miles on
it. Those who did know that it did *not* contain your home address and
phone number. Piling lie upon lie upon lie is simply digging you in
deeper.

Bull****. Even you commented that it showed that I logged onto the account
yesterday. I was removing my address and phone number (editing the ad) when
I did.

So then you said there was no field for phone number and address and I
showed you where.

So then you said I did not edit it. So showed you how easily it could be
done.

So now you say it the last log on was 2003 before I totally edited it today.

So now you continue to pile on the insults and personal attacks on me.

You are an internet stalker Chuck. You posted my address and phone number
and now deny every doing so, even though several folks here saw it.

Spin away Chucky. You might some day become as good as your buddy Krause.