![]() |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: I did not post his home address. I did not stalk him to obtain that information. I confronted him on several reviews and opinions he offered here. If he chooses to offer boat reviews then he is subject to questions and criticisms. His retaliatory behavior, however, is certainly not acceptable and speaks loudly of his personal ethics and morals. And I did not post your home address, JimH. Bull****. Don't spin out of this one Chuck. You sunk to a new low. Whatever respect I once had for you is now totally gone. You are in the squid **** in the deepest depths of the ocean with Krause. |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html That's a hoot! (But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't lobbed at a specific individual) Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so. I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but one not having any sexual connotations like this one does. JimH wrote: For your information that moped belonged to my son. He bought it with his own money. I was selling it for him and that was one site that exclusively dealt with mopeds. Get a life Chuck. Then find some higher moral standards to live by. ***************** Make note: Dishes out all day everyday but hates to take it. Bull****. I have never posted personal information about you. You sunk to a new low just because I took you to task about a fluff boating review you did. You got your shorts in a knot about it and decided to retaliate by publishing personal information about me here in this NG. You have not ethics or morals Chuck. |
Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck, I really didn't look at the details on the for sale too closely, since you obviously did, how is someone who wants to buy the moped supposed to get in contact with Jim. Are you for real?? JimH posted an e-mail address. Remember 'boatlessnut'?? |
Yo Ho wrote: Chuck, I really didn't look at the details on the for sale too closely, since you obviously did, how is someone who wants to buy the moped supposed to get in contact with Jim. JimH highlighted the fact that the authors of boating reviews and articles in boating magazines have sold their soul to boat builders and suppliers. That is a fact that is understood by all except a few newbie's. Your excellent review of SeaRay boats should be read with that caveat understood. One would not expect a used car salesman or a used boat broker to be honest, but a newbie might expect a boating magazine to be honest. Jim's comment was a public service. Wow. This is a gold mine. First, you castigate me earlier in the thread for posting Jim's phone number. When challenged, you sheepishly admit that you didn't pay enough attention to the site to determine whether Jim's phone number was posted or not. (It wasn't) At least you admit that you had no idea what you were rattling on about. You wind up by claiming that Jim's personal comments about me are a "public service". One would expect a self righteous hypocrite calling out somebody for posting another's phone number to be "honest", don't you think? Just as the false claim "Gould promised to post the detailed layup schedule of the Sea Ray" from a few days ago demonstrates, your skills in discussion and debate are apparently so weak that you need to make up issues over which to confront people. Changing your name every day isn't an effective disguise. Go ahead and dial "Jim's phone number" as you claim I disclosed it. You'll hear Simon and Garfunkle on the line.....:The Sounds of Silence. |
wrote in message oups.com... Yo Ho wrote: Chuck, I really didn't look at the details on the for sale too closely, since you obviously did, how is someone who wants to buy the moped supposed to get in contact with Jim. JimH highlighted the fact that the authors of boating reviews and articles in boating magazines have sold their soul to boat builders and suppliers. That is a fact that is understood by all except a few newbie's. Your excellent review of SeaRay boats should be read with that caveat understood. One would not expect a used car salesman or a used boat broker to be honest, but a newbie might expect a boating magazine to be honest. Jim's comment was a public service. Wow. This is a gold mine. First, you castigate me earlier in the thread for posting Jim's phone number. When challenged, you sheepishly admit that you didn't pay enough attention to the site to determine whether Jim's phone number was posted or not. (It wasn't) At least you admit that you had no idea what you were rattling on about. You wind up by claiming that Jim's personal comments about me are a "public service". Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck? |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html That's a hoot! (But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't lobbed at a specific individual) Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so. I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but one not having any sexual connotations like this one does. This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find it a "hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me? Indeed. Double standards. I understand now. Quit crying, and grow up. |
Tim wrote: There are certain posters here - Hertvik, Smithers, Fritz, Robbins - who are so ashamed of what they do for a living they won't even discuss it in general terms - but they are quick to put down what many other people who are more open about themselves do for a living. Mr. Krause....does that also include atl_m who started the thread? Nope, it does not. I'm not at all ashamed of what I do for a living. |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html That's a hoot! (But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't lobbed at a specific individual) Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so. I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but one not having any sexual connotations like this one does. This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find it a "hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me? Indeed. Double standards. I understand now. OK. I speak up for JimH when its appropriate and all I get is more of his sour crap. So I'm a slow learner. Let's put some actual humor into this thread: Here's a funny item. There happens to be a guy with a really similar name, living in about the same area, who belongs to the "MOPED Army". This other guy, with a really similar name and living in about the same area must be quite the sight all suited up for "battle". Imagine a big hurking midwestern adult perched knees akimbo atop a tiny little motorbike, (Red Baron leather helmet and owl-eyed goggles strapped on), whizzing around the cul-de-sac and shouting out the Moped Army's slogan: "Swarm and Destroy!" That's darn nearly as funny a mental image as (name deleted but old timers know who) in his bikini underwear (gag me, yet again). If I were JimH, I'd track down this guy with a really similar name and living in about the same area. Apparently he's fallen on hard times, is resigning his commission in the Moped Army, and has been forced to put his war horse up for sale. It might make sense to buy that thing, and get the other JimH off the streets of (insert name of town here), just to save whatever might be left of the family reputation. "Swarm and Destroy", indeed. You have officially joined the JimH stalking team. Congratulations. Harry is president, you have now been officially elected VP. What's next, coming to my house to spray paint it. Pathetic. For your information that moped belonged to my son. He bought it with his own money. I was selling it for him and that was one site that exclusively dealt with mopeds. Get a life Chuck. Then find some higher moral standards to live by. Hmm, kind of like you and your **** buddy Fritz stalking ME??? Look at any and every thread that I've posted to, and you two asswipes will be there. |
I am glad you did not challenge the fact that boat magazines and those that
write for them have sold their soul to boat builders and suppliers. wrote in message oups.com... Yo Ho wrote: Chuck, I really didn't look at the details on the for sale too closely, since you obviously did, how is someone who wants to buy the moped supposed to get in contact with Jim. JimH highlighted the fact that the authors of boating reviews and articles in boating magazines have sold their soul to boat builders and suppliers. That is a fact that is understood by all except a few newbie's. Your excellent review of SeaRay boats should be read with that caveat understood. One would not expect a used car salesman or a used boat broker to be honest, but a newbie might expect a boating magazine to be honest. Jim's comment was a public service. Wow. This is a gold mine. First, you castigate me earlier in the thread for posting Jim's phone number. When challenged, you sheepishly admit that you didn't pay enough attention to the site to determine whether Jim's phone number was posted or not. (It wasn't) At least you admit that you had no idea what you were rattling on about. You wind up by claiming that Jim's personal comments about me are a "public service". One would expect a self righteous hypocrite calling out somebody for posting another's phone number to be "honest", don't you think? Just as the false claim "Gould promised to post the detailed layup schedule of the Sea Ray" from a few days ago demonstrates, your skills in discussion and debate are apparently so weak that you need to make up issues over which to confront people. Changing your name every day isn't an effective disguise. Go ahead and dial "Jim's phone number" as you claim I disclosed it. You'll hear Simon and Garfunkle on the line.....:The Sounds of Silence. |
P. Fritz wrote: "Tim" wrote in message oups.com... There are certain posters here - Hertvik, Smithers, Fritz, Robbins - who are so ashamed of what they do for a living they won't even discuss it in general terms - but they are quick to put down what many other people who are more open about themselves do for a living. Mr. Krause....does that also include atl_m who started the thread? -- I'm a starter mechanic. I've run a starter and alternator shop for the last 26 years. Tim harry is the one that should be ashamed of what he does for a living.......sucking off of others labor via his union gig. We've all seen what harry and his ilk do with personal information.......we haven't found a need to lie about our lives like harry, kevin etc. Hmm, like when you worked as an architect on Atlanta Hartsfield, liar? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com