When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article , "Don"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...

Don wrote in message
...

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote

Wait a minute, awhile back you said:
************************************************** ***
I also live in Sugar Land. And no, one cannot take firearms out into
the
backyard and practice with live rounds. Not even a BB gun for that
matter.
You have watched too many westerns on your boob tube.
************************************************** ***

And now you're saying that people CAN shoot guns in their backyards:
************************************************** ***
LoL, actually I have a police officer neighbor a few door away
that
shoots
snakes in his yard. He is deathly afraid of snakes and his house
backs
up to a bayou.
************************************************** ***

So the question is, were you lying then, or are you lying now?
Please consult your boob tube if necessary.

Oh oh Henry! You've 'been told' again.

I bet he won't answer, now that he's been publicly spanked.


Whatever.

LOL
I predicted right! Ha ha haaaaaa
Hey dikhed, how does it feel to be proven a bald faced liar in front of
millions of people? ROFLMMFAO
Didn't you mention something about DejaNews a few posts ago?
Guess what, your lying ass has been sealed in infamy! LOL

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article , "Don White"
wrote:

Don wrote in message
.. .

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote

Wait a minute, awhile back you said:
************************************************** ***
I also live in Sugar Land. And no, one cannot take firearms out into
the
backyard and practice with live rounds. Not even a BB gun for that
matter.
You have watched too many westerns on your boob tube.
************************************************** ***

And now you're saying that people CAN shoot guns in their backyards:
************************************************** ***
LoL, actually I have a police officer neighbor a few door away that
shoots
snakes in his yard. He is deathly afraid of snakes and his house
backs
up to a bayou.
************************************************** ***

So the question is, were you lying then, or are you lying now?
Please consult your boob tube if necessary.

Oh oh Henry! You've 'been told' again.

By an anarchist moron? Hardly....

LOL, what a cowardly liar. Ha ha ha haaaaaa

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article , "Don"
wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote

Wait a minute, awhile back you said:
************************************************* ****
I also live in Sugar Land. And no, one cannot take firearms out into the
backyard and practice with live rounds. Not even a BB gun for that
matter.
You have watched too many westerns on your boob tube.
************************************************* ****

And now you're saying that people CAN shoot guns in their backyards:
************************************************* ****
LoL, actually I have a police officer neighbor a few door away that
shoots
snakes in his yard. He is deathly afraid of snakes and his house backs
up to a bayou.
************************************************* ****

So the question is, were you lying then, or are you lying now?
Please consult your boob tube if necessary.


My comments were in context with the fact that their are laws against
firearms
here as in most cities in Texas and elsewhere for that matter.

Please continue (this is gonna be good)......

The fact that police officers are often above the law is not something
that is
a localized problem.

So, you were lying then.....

Police officers not enforcing laws on police officers
happens everywhere. That is part of their code.

.....AND you're lying now! LOL

So how does you feeble attempt to take things out of context make one a
liar?

I quoted your exact words precisely, asswipe, and they proved you to be a
liar.
On top of that, after thinking hard about it for 3 days, all you could
muster was some silly nonsense about cops supposedly being above the law.
LOL
Hey, buttplug, why haven't you turned your neighbor, the law breaking cop,
in?
What's the matter, you scared, pussyboy?
Oh, I see, you practice anarchy when its convenient for you and the rest of
the time you perform like a good little slave.
I hope your (above the law...LOL) neighbor/cop shoots your stupid ass in the
face.
At least he has some balls, all you have are wrinkled, well worn, 14"
labia....pussyboy.
Speak of bookyak...

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

Doug Kanter wrote:
Yeah...I got your behavioral psychology right here, Mr King. :-) Dr Smith &
Dr Wesson. The best dog training tool money can buy.

But it only works on six dogs at a time. And bullets don't go around
corners ;)

I apologize if my posts have seemed to be more sympathetic to your
annoying neighbors than to your situation. That hasn't been my
intention. While I am definitely a "dog person" I don't like people who
let (or encourage) their dogs to cause problems.

DSK

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Doug Kanter wrote:
Yeah...I got your behavioral psychology right here, Mr King. :-) Dr
Smith &
Dr Wesson. The best dog training tool money can buy.

But it only works on six dogs at a time. And bullets don't go around
corners ;)

I apologize if my posts have seemed to be more sympathetic to your
annoying neighbors than to your situation. That hasn't been my
intention. While I am definitely a "dog person" I don't like people who
let (or encourage) their dogs to cause problems.

DSK


I know. The average of all your posts in the past have kept you on my Good
List, meaning I'd let you borrow my lawnmower. Not my boat, though. :-)

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

In article . net,
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote:



I also own an Australian Cattle dog..... They are the ultimate chill
pills.


Then you'd better get a more dogs... lots and lots of them.

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:13:29 -0400, "Don"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:31:31 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

What the **** is it with you John?
What the hell difference does it make if Doug agrees with me?
Don't you have a brain of your own?
Don't you have a backbone?
We're not talking rocket surgery here, just very simple basics.
Most kids are taught these things at about age 5, how old are you?
Here, I'll spell it out for you:
*Treat other people as you want to be treated.*
There, is that simple enough?
If you abuse that one simple rule of humanity you may pay a severe
consequence.
Don't let your dog **** in my yard, don't paintball my house, don't
fondle
my daughter, etc.
In turn I won't do those things to you.
Does any of this make sense to you?


Fair enough. If my dog ****s in your yard, you have my permission to
**** in mine. If you kill my dog, then I kill you. Fair?

That is fair.
However, I went one step further, to insure your civility. We installed a 6'
high estate fence around our new home so that your dog will not cause you to
get killed.
See how nice I am?

Funny that in all the posts that I've suggested the same to Doug, he
fails to consider it. I guess in his mind, he should not have to be
"burdened" with the chore of constructing a fence to keep the unwanted
out of his garden. He feels that it's everyone else's responsibility
to keep them out for him.

You seem to have this issue with comparing apples to oranges. In no
way, in any rational person's mind, should something so trivial as
"dog droppings" justify lethal force as a response.

Then you would have no problem with all of my dogs ****ting on your couch
repeatedly?

Why do you guys like to go to the extreme and out of the realm of
reality when trying top make points? Strawman arguments are easy to
pick apart because they do not reflect reality. I'm not suggesting
that you don't have the right to respond to inconsiderate neighbors. I
am saying that you are restricted by law to a measured response.

To take a page from your examples from the extreme, if a kid throws a
egg at your window, you can't shoot an RPG after him.

You seem to be following Johns footsteps.
Not once have I advocated harming an animal, ever.

Really? Then what ARE you advocating?

Dave

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:18:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Don" wrote in message
.. .


Then you would have no problem with all of my dogs ****ting on your couch
repeatedly?

Warning, Don: You've just suggested a hypothetical situation. Dave Hall
likes to call that a "straw man", which he's incapable of dealing with. He
doesn't realize that virtually every legal debate in the higher courts
involves lawyers and judges trading a series of "straw men" to test the law.
So, he uses the term to dismiss other peoples' arguments.


Doug, you REALLY need to spend more time studying logic and fallacious
argument techniques. Most of those fallacious arguments are nothing
more than attempts at deflection. As such, a "strawman" argument is
commonly defined as:

"Strawman Argument: (np) 1. Stating a misrepresented version of an
opponent's argument for the purpose of having an easier target to
knock down. A common, but deprecated, mode of argument".

Including, but not limited to, building up an exaggerated set of
extreme circumstances which, while intended to better illustrate the
position of one side of the debate, rarely occur in reality, and it's
therefore generally discarded as little more than an endless circular
debate over "what-if" scenarios.

I don't mind, and have no problem dealing with hypothetical
situations, as long as they bear some semblance to reality. The
likelihood of a neighbor's dogs opening the door to my house and then
"relieving" themselves on my couch, is about the same as you getting
hit by a falling meteor while tending your garden.

Dave

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:57:05 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

I design million dollar+ custom homes for wealthy island residents and live
in an area called *Simply Paradise* (run that past google for a clue) and am
always in a good mood and in good company.
I get a little frustrated at times when I go into usenet and encounter
legions of complete idiots like you.


"legions of idiots" who understand the law, and generally oppose folks
who don't seem to understand the concept that society works both ways
Even for wealthy elitists........

Dave

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:05:17 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...
So you think that money makes one happy? You sound pretty shallow to me.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like it.

He's pretty friendly to me, even though we disagree on a few things. But
see....here's the deal: Neither he nor I say outrageous things that fly in
the face of logic.


What? Most of your arguments thus far on this topic have been
outrageous. Both of you guys are projecting the position that you are
justified in taking the law into your own hands, despite written law
to the contrary.

You bemoan "inconsiderate" neighbors, who may be guilty of some degree
of negligence, but "retaliate" against them with an equally
inconsiderate response. I'm sorry but you will never convince me that
you are morally or legally authorized to terminate the life of another
living being no matter what "damage" or inconvenience they may have
caused you. There are proper channels to seek out compensation or
retribution for these acts. That these proper channels are not "good
enough" for you is not our problem.

Dave