"DSK" wrote in message
...
Wait a minute, I thought it was over 3 million? Is that pesky math
disability catching up with you again?


NOYB wrote:
3 million in the last 23 months. Negative 2+ million in the first 20
months. That gives a net gain of 900,000 in 53 months.

Math, DSK, math.


But first you said that Bush hasn't lost any jobs, then you said that he'd
caused a net gain of 3 1/2 million. You said the Democrat claims of net
job loss under Bush were all lies.

It *is* a lie to say that there has been a *net* job loss under Bush.



Now you say that he *did* lose jobs, then gain more... and you seem to not
know whether the result is more than 3 million as you first claimed (did
you lie?), or less than 1 million

I've posted the exact numbers on here befo


We're up 3.466 million jobs in the last 23 months. That's 23 straight
months of net jobs *gained*.


Since Bush took office, we've had a total net gain of 839,000 jobs.



So that means there was a net loss of 2.627 million jobs in the first 20
months, and a net gain of 3.466 million jobs in the most recent 23
months...giving us a net gain of 839,000 jobs since Bush first took office
in 2001.

Employment data is a lagging indicator. The first 6-12 months of Bush's
Presidency are a reflection of where the economy was 6 to 12 months earlier.
The next 6-12 months are a reflection of what happened on 9/11. The last 23
months (3.466 million *net* jobs gained) are a reflection of Bush's economic
policies, rather than those of his predecessor.

Got it?