Wait a minute, I thought it was over 3 million? Is that pesky math
disability catching up with you again?


NOYB wrote:
3 million in the last 23 months. Negative 2+ million in the first 20
months. That gives a net gain of 900,000 in 53 months.

Math, DSK, math.


But first you said that Bush hasn't lost any jobs, then you said that
he'd caused a net gain of 3 1/2 million. You said the Democrat claims of
net job loss under Bush were all lies.

Now you say that he *did* lose jobs, then gain more... and you seem to
not know whether the result is more than 3 million as you first claimed
(did you lie?), or less than 1 million.

It seems to me that if you can't explain the situation without either
using two different sets of numbers for the same figure of merit (they
send accountants to jail for that, y'know) and/or calling other people
liars (among other names), then you probably aren't very close to the
truth yourself. The truth is usually simple & commonsense, real world
facts are usually rather consistent.

Why do 'conservatives' fear the truth, and why do they engage in so much
doubletalk?

DSK