![]() |
"KMAN" wrote in message . .. "BCITORGB" wrote in message oups.com... rick says: ================ Nice strawman there fool. =================== I thought rick had been cured of the "strawman" habit. For your next exercise, try spotting logical fallacies. Try a red herring. But please, leave the strawman alone, eh? frtzw906 LOL. He likes to throw that one around, and also "jingoistic." ================ Because, fool, that is exactly what your chest-thumping lies are. Too bad you're too stupid to understnad, eh? I can only guess he took some sort of combined first year psych and first year social studies course and those are the only two terms he remembers. ================== At least I can remember my own quotes from a week ago, liar. |
"KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message .net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/28/05 12:59 AM: snippage... "I agree, that you claim, that he made the claim, and failed to support it. No mystery here after watching this squabble for the last week!" ...I missed out on the weasel words you threw in there. I guess you really are afraid of rick! While you are still up, Tinkerntom, let me see if you are not too big of a coward to give a straight answer. Have you seen rick provide any evidence to support a claim that Canadians are dying in waiting lines for health care? =============== Nice strawman there fool. He already siad he wasn't, BECAUSE he did not go back and read the previous posts. Man, you really are this stupid, aren't you? Right. So thus far not one person on rec.boats.paddle has seen anything from you that proves what you have claimed. =============== No fool, I have provided sites that show that Canadians are dying in wait lines. YOU have yet to provide anything that refutes those sites. You have yet to talk to everyone in the world about what you've already read and ignored, and are now lying about. |
"KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message .net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 2/27/05 4:52 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 2/27/05 6:32 AM: snip... If you are using cars as a justification for assault weapons, then you are comparing the two, fool. LOL. ========================== No fool. It is you that is trying to justify something based on what YOU determine to be a need. You failed. You brought up cars, not me. ====================== No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... You brought up cars. Check. =============== LOL STill as dense and stupid as ever I see, eh liar? You brought up 'need' as the basis for owning an object. I just proved to you that 'need' has no bearing on what people do and do not 'have' to own or 'want' to own. You're ignorance is very amusing. Well worth the effort to expose it. |
"rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message .net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/28/05 12:59 AM: snippage... "I agree, that you claim, that he made the claim, and failed to support it. No mystery here after watching this squabble for the last week!" ...I missed out on the weasel words you threw in there. I guess you really are afraid of rick! While you are still up, Tinkerntom, let me see if you are not too big of a coward to give a straight answer. Have you seen rick provide any evidence to support a claim that Canadians are dying in waiting lines for health care? =============== Nice strawman there fool. He already siad he wasn't, BECAUSE he did not go back and read the previous posts. Man, you really are this stupid, aren't you? Right. So thus far not one person on rec.boats.paddle has seen anything from you that proves what you have claimed. =============== No fool, I have provided sites that show that Canadians are dying in wait lines. Not one other person has seen anything from you to substantiate your claims. |
"rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message .net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 2/27/05 4:52 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 2/27/05 6:32 AM: snip... If you are using cars as a justification for assault weapons, then you are comparing the two, fool. LOL. ========================== No fool. It is you that is trying to justify something based on what YOU determine to be a need. You failed. You brought up cars, not me. ====================== No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... You brought up cars. Check. =============== LOL STill as dense and stupid as ever I see, eh liar? Nope. You brought up cars. Check. |
"Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... KMAN wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... KMAN wrote: in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/28/05 12:59 AM: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 2/28/05 12:40 AM: KMAN wrote: in article et, rick at wrote on 2/27/05 5:10 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , Tinkerntom snip.. Tinkerntom, I'm actually surprised that a man of your high moral stands has not jumped in to criticize rick for being a liar and a coward. Why is that? ================ MAybe for the simple reason that I have not lied. Of course, you cannot make the same claim. Why not at least back up one of your claims, fool? If just one Canadian died in a waiting line for health care it would be a national scandal featured on the front page of every newspaper and the lead story of every television and readio news program. It hasn't happened rick. You made it up. You are a liar. And a coward for refusing to admit it. To his credit, Tinkerntom has added his name to the list of those who have never seen you prove your claim. I Did? Where did I say such a thing? TnT Eh? Sorry, my mistake. When I first read... "I agree, that you claim, that he made the claim, and failed to support it. No mystery here after watching this squabble for the last week!" ...I missed out on the weasel words you threw in there. I guess you really are afraid of rick! While you are still up, Tinkerntom, let me see if you are not too big of a coward to give a straight answer. Have you seen rick provide any evidence to support a claim that Canadians are dying in waiting lines for health care? [] Yes [] No What if I vote, and I get a hanging chad? Do we call Katherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Florida Supreme Ct. or US Supreme Ct. to get this mess straightened out? TnT Coward! So what must I do to get off your Coward list, I'm waiting to hear? TnT Answer the question. It's not like I suddenly gave you a label with no foundation, Tinkerntom. You know exactly what this is about. Have you seen rick provide any evidence to support a claim that Canadians are dying in waiting lines for health care? [] Yes [] No |
On 26-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:
But, the point is that I get to fight to the death Do that. You won't be missed. Which "gay rights" would you be referring to? Gays have exactly the same rights as any other individual citizen under the Constitution. 12 states in the US make it illegal for homosexuals to make love. There is no state that makes it illegal for heterosexuals to make love. Homosexuals cannot marry in most US states - heterosexuals can marry in any state. Hardly examples of how gays have the same rights as non-gays. The worst sorts of genocides and mass killings only take place where the oppressed minority has been disarmed. Armed minorities are still outnumbered. Guns are not an equalizer. But they don't, they increase it. Just because they haven't been, doesn't mean they can't be used to reduce freedom. When someone puts a bullet thru your skull, you lose all your rights. Mike |
On 26-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote: And what precludes God from manifesting himself as a human born of a human woman? He is God after all, he can do pretty much anything he wants, by definition But that is not God manifesting himself as God. Which is what I said in the first place, idiot. You don't think that a burning bush that's not consumed is not God revealing himself? Still not God manifesting himself as God. According to whom? What makes their judgment infallible. Uhh, they can _read_ Hebrew. But that's in the realm of reality, where you are at a loss. Mike |
KMAN wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... KMAN wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... KMAN wrote: in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/28/05 12:59 AM: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 2/28/05 12:40 AM: KMAN wrote: in article et, rick at wrote on 2/27/05 5:10 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , Tinkerntom snip.. Tinkerntom, I'm actually surprised that a man of your high moral stands has not jumped in to criticize rick for being a liar and a coward. Why is that? ================ MAybe for the simple reason that I have not lied. Of course, you cannot make the same claim. Why not at least back up one of your claims, fool? If just one Canadian died in a waiting line for health care it would be a national scandal featured on the front page of every newspaper and the lead story of every television and readio news program. It hasn't happened rick. You made it up. You are a liar. And a coward for refusing to admit it. To his credit, Tinkerntom has added his name to the list of those who have never seen you prove your claim. I Did? Where did I say such a thing? TnT Eh? Sorry, my mistake. When I first read... "I agree, that you claim, that he made the claim, and failed to support it. No mystery here after watching this squabble for the last week!" ...I missed out on the weasel words you threw in there. I guess you really are afraid of rick! While you are still up, Tinkerntom, let me see if you are not too big of a coward to give a straight answer. Have you seen rick provide any evidence to support a claim that Canadians are dying in waiting lines for health care? [] Yes [] No What if I vote, and I get a hanging chad? Do we call Katherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Florida Supreme Ct. or US Supreme Ct. to get this mess straightened out? TnT Coward! So what must I do to get off your Coward list, I'm waiting to hear? TnT Answer the question. It's not like I suddenly gave you a label with no foundation, Tinkerntom. You know exactly what this is about. Have you seen rick provide any evidence to support a claim that Canadians are dying in waiting lines for health care? [] Yes [] No Ok I'll try to answer you! Last night, I spent several hours going through the archives of this discussion, reading several hundred post by Kman, frtwz, Mike D, Wilko, Scott W, and of course our good friend rick. I do not know whether rick will abide by my arbitration in this matter though so I am not sure whether I should wait for him to agree. However, he did say in one of his post even this AM, that he stands by his record, and that he posted as he claims evidence of Canadians dying while on wait list for medical procedures and Tests. I am assuming also that being on a wait list is the same thing as being in a wait line. If they are different, I did not find any claim by rick that people are dying in an actual line while waiting, or evidence to support any such claim. However, on 2/20 at 9:32 Rick presented 4 links as evidence to support his claim that Canadians were dying while on wait list, and receiving late, slow, and inadequate medical procedures. That if a Canadian had the funding, that he could go to the USA and receive prompt medical attention, and that in Canada, such outsoursing was considered illegal, and subject to a substantial penalty. Rick was not comparing the advantages or disadvantages of the two systems, nor even saying that the American system was good at all. He was only commenting on the Canadian system that resulted in long wait times for certain procedures and tests that at times resulted in people dying before they could receive the medical attention that could have served to save their lives. He was not saying that once the people actually received the medical attention, that the medical practices themselves were inadequate or non-professional. The 4 links are as follow: http://www.nupge.ca/news_2000/News%20May/n12my00a.htm http://www.cato.org/dailys/07-24-04.html http://www.utoronto.ca/hpme/dhr/pdf/Barer-Lewis.pdf http://www.angelfire.com/pa/sergeman...oysplight.html The main objection to one of the links at the time was regarding the Frasier Institute, and its supposed backers, as being anti-Canadian medical system. Whether this is true or not, I can not determine. Rick also offered that there were many other links to support his claim, data that came from Canadian universites, labor unions, think tanks, that would not supposedly be anti-Canadian. He did not list any other specific link that I found. Regarding your question, unless there is a distinction between waiting list, and waiting lines, and irregardless of the credibility of the links provided as evidence, I believe that rick did provide evidence to support his claim. So my vote is yes, and I believe you KMAN owe rick a public apology. Now I hope this can bring and end to the acrimony, and I would note that though I believe rick provided the evidence, that I understand better after reading maybe a hundred post by him that his style can be abrasive. My only suggestion is that in the future if you want to avoid the abrasion, don't engage him in debate. TnT TnT |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com