Doug,
I am glad you got a good education and have continued to learn. My point to
Gould was the two surveys below showed that Republicans have a better formal
education than Democrats.

And my point stands:

To what portion of the audience do the slandrous right wing attack ads attempt
to appeal?

The college educated? puh-leeeze

Gould 0738 wrote:
Doug,
I am glad you got a good education and have continued to learn. My point to
Gould was the two surveys below showed that Republicans have a better formal
education than Democrats.

And my point stands:

To what portion of the audience do the slandrous right wing attack ads attempt
to appeal?

The college educated? puh-leeeze



Anything you need to know about today's Repubicans is embodied in their
support for George W. Bush, the dumbest, least competent POTUS in
anyone's memory.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Gould,

I thought you were smarter than that, my bad.

The attack ads and mud slinging from either the right or the left is not
targeted at democrats or republicans, they are targeted at the independents
and swing votes.

By the way, did you forget that independent study I referenced earlier, that
showed Kerry's team is more guilty of attack ads than Bush's team.

One needs to be careful of throwing stones if one lives in a glass house.

You are not upset about the slanderous slanderous attack ads, you are upset
because even though Kerry is using more negative advertising he is not as
effective as Bush's negative ads.






"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Doug,
I am glad you got a good education and have continued to learn. My point
to
Gould was the two surveys below showed that Republicans have a better
formal
education than Democrats.

And my point stands:

To what portion of the audience do the slandrous right wing attack ads
attempt
to appeal?

The college educated? puh-leeeze

By the way, did you forget that independent study I referenced earlier, that
showed Kerry's team is more guilty of attack ads than Bush's team.



I can probably find an "indenpendent study" that proves Hillary Clinton is the
Virgin Mary. An intelligent conservative would be ablr to organize a body of
evidence that surpasses a singel survey.

Give it up. Kerry's a loser. Being from MA and seeing his work ethic and
lack of any moral convictions in the past, is he going to change. I think
not.
He's just playing the game like the rest but to the nth degree.
Any moron today can get up and say he's for health care, social security,
world peace, save to poor and get votes.
Let's smarten up.
We'll never have world peace, social security is fine and if everyone would
stop abusing the present health care systems, they won't be so expensive.
I remember a time when you went to the doctor's office and paid for the
visit. We're not talking a lot of money here. But now, someone gets a wood
splinter and they run to the doctors.
The demos had a president who obsouletly dodge the draft during the Vietnam
war, but that was okay.
I must say that one's not much better than the other.

You know what, do what you want to do, but keep your hands out of my
pockets. I work hard for my money and do not appreciate handing it over to
people who want to abuse the system, sit home and watch the boob tube while
I'm working.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
By the way, did you forget that independent study I referenced earlier,
that
showed Kerry's team is more guilty of attack ads than Bush's team.



I can probably find an "indenpendent study" that proves Hillary Clinton is
the
Virgin Mary. An intelligent conservative would be ablr to organize a body
of
evidence that surpasses a singel survey.

Can you find one independent survey that proves Bush is more guilty of
slinging mud than Kerry?


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
By the way, did you forget that independent study I referenced earlier,
that
showed Kerry's team is more guilty of attack ads than Bush's team.



I can probably find an "indenpendent study" that proves Hillary Clinton is
the
Virgin Mary. An intelligent conservative would be ablr to organize a body
of
evidence that surpasses a singel survey.

Can you find one independent survey that proves Bush is more guilty of
slinging mud than Kerry?



I'm not inclined to look for one. Only those blind to the obvious, contrasting,
tone of the campaigns would need a survey to begin with.

Ok, since the survey didn't agree with your theory, it must be wrong. Since
I don't agree with you, I must be blind.

There is not much I can say.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Can you find one independent survey that proves Bush is more guilty of
slinging mud than Kerry?



I'm not inclined to look for one. Only those blind to the obvious,
contrasting,
tone of the campaigns would need a survey to begin with.

Ok, since the survey didn't agree with your theory, it must be wrong. Since
I don't agree with you, I must be blind.

There is not much I can say.

Sure there is. Say you don't agree with me, and explain why.

Don't rely on a survey to do your thinking for you. If I wanted to debate the
survey, I'd find out who put it together and communicate with them. Do you
speak for the survey group? If not, why would I bother to discuss it with you?

For every survey "proving" one side of a political issue, there is an equally
biased survey proving the other side. Surely this isn't news to a member of the
"more intelligent, but can't dance, GOP."?

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Can you find one independent survey that proves Bush is more guilty of
slinging mud than Kerry?



I'm not inclined to look for one. Only those blind to the obvious,
contrasting,
tone of the campaigns would need a survey to begin with.

There may be a perfectly valid reason for the difference. Have you ever
watched an experienced teacher interacting with a kid with special needs?
She'll make a V with her fingers and point to her eyes to make sure the kid
is truly focused on the teacher's face. It works. The next step is simple:
Anyone who either plans to vote for Bush or is undecided has a clear need to
be brought to a more focused state. More to the point, they need to be taken
by the lapels and shaken severely. That's the goal of Kerry's ads.