Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #131   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:21 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:56:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree.
Expensive burnt water at that.

McDonalds isn't bad though..

They switched brands or something a few years back, and the new (?) stuff is much
better. The old stuff was atrocious.

Their sausage biscuit is the only thing on their menu worth buying, as far as I'm
concerned.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior
drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises
are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling.


My wife likes their salads - and the bathrooms. I've seen their senior coffees for
anywhere between $.50 and $.85. If I'm on a long ride, they're a great place to stop
for a break.


I can eat a sausage and egg on a hamburger bun, if they will do it but
I am not much of a muffin or biscuit guy.
Too dry.
McD doesn't have much on the lunch menu I like if I want more than a
salad.
I really like the S/E/C on a croissant at the Burger King but I
suspect that is a heart attack in a bag. The thing seems to be
dripping in butter.
I am not really in love with any "fast food" fries. The best ones were
at Sonny's BBQ but I haven't been there for a while. I imagine the
health nuts may have changed the formula by now.
I think they used to use lard.
  #132   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote:
The John flushes....

You'll note he still hasn't answered the question
eating meat, shoes, and gloves.

Wonder why?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
It's Christmas season, don't y'all know?

Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas
spirit his way
and see what happens. :-)

Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat
meat, wear leather
shoes, or leather gloves?"

Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Why the sense of entitlement?

??
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those
questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these
questions
many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or
more. My
conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to
answers.

You aren't.

Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen
times or more!

:)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


The point is that some aren't playing your games.

Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don
back yourself in to.

Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on
them, and shut up.
Works for me.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


"It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your
game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the
hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter.

You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you
(or Don)
can't/won't answer.

You need to add a lot more names to that list.

I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit
that searched and
recovered dead soldiers.

Hee, hee.

I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in
any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on.



The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the
truth.


Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that
he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as
he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while.


The truth isn't too much to ask, is it?
  #133   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:29:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote:
The John flushes....

You'll note he still hasn't answered the question
eating meat, shoes, and gloves.

Wonder why?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
It's Christmas season, don't y'all know?

Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas
spirit his way
and see what happens. :-)

Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat
meat, wear leather
shoes, or leather gloves?"

Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Why the sense of entitlement?

??
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those
questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these
questions
many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or
more. My
conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to
answers.

You aren't.

Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen
times or more!

:)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


The point is that some aren't playing your games.

Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don
back yourself in to.

Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on
them, and shut up.
Works for me.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


"It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your
game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the
hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter.

You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you
(or Don)
can't/won't answer.

You need to add a lot more names to that list.

I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit
that searched and
recovered dead soldiers.

Hee, hee.

I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in
any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on.


The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the
truth.


Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that
he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as
he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while.


The truth isn't too much to ask, is it?


Apparently Don thinks there is a big difference between facts and truth.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!
  #134   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:12:05 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:21 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:56:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree.
Expensive burnt water at that.

McDonalds isn't bad though..

They switched brands or something a few years back, and the new (?) stuff is much
better. The old stuff was atrocious.

Their sausage biscuit is the only thing on their menu worth buying, as far as I'm
concerned.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior
drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises
are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling.


My wife likes their salads - and the bathrooms. I've seen their senior coffees for
anywhere between $.50 and $.85. If I'm on a long ride, they're a great place to stop
for a break.


I can eat a sausage and egg on a hamburger bun, if they will do it but
I am not much of a muffin or biscuit guy.
Too dry.
McD doesn't have much on the lunch menu I like if I want more than a
salad.
I really like the S/E/C on a croissant at the Burger King but I
suspect that is a heart attack in a bag. The thing seems to be
dripping in butter.
I am not really in love with any "fast food" fries. The best ones were
at Sonny's BBQ but I haven't been there for a while. I imagine the
health nuts may have changed the formula by now.
I think they used to use lard.


If I get the sausage and egg it's with a small orange juice for moisture!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!
  #135   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:24 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote:
The John flushes....

You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves.

Wonder why?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
It's Christmas season, don't y'all know?

Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way
and see what happens. :-)

Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather
shoes, or leather gloves?"

Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Why the sense of entitlement?

??
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those
questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions
many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My
conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers.

You aren't.

Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more!

:)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


The point is that some aren't playing your games.

Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to.

Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up.
Works for me.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


"It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your
game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the
hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter.


You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don)
can't/won't answer.

You need to add a lot more names to that list.

I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and
recovered dead soldiers.

Hee, hee.


I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in
any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on.


You should ask. Be interesting to see if you are 'entitled' to an answer.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


  #136   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:29:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote:
The John flushes....

You'll note he still hasn't answered the question
eating meat, shoes, and gloves.

Wonder why?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
It's Christmas season, don't y'all know?

Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas
spirit his way
and see what happens. :-)

Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat
meat, wear leather
shoes, or leather gloves?"

Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Why the sense of entitlement?

??
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those
questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these
questions
many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or
more. My
conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to
answers.

You aren't.

Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen
times or more!

)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


The point is that some aren't playing your games.

Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don
back yourself in to.

Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on
them, and shut up.
Works for me.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


"It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your
game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the
hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter.

You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you
(or Don)
can't/won't answer.

You need to add a lot more names to that list.

I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit
that searched and
recovered dead soldiers.

Hee, hee.

I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in
any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on.


The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the
truth.


Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that
he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as
he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while.


The truth isn't too much to ask, is it?


Apparently Don thinks there is a big difference between facts and truth.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games
here.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+
  #137   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,756
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
"Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games
here."


I wholeheartedly agree with this post.
The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey.
  #138   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On 12/11/2015 5:21 PM, True North wrote:
Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
"Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games
here."


I wholeheartedly agree with this post.
The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey.

Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so.
  #139   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2015
Posts: 920
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:12:05 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:21 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:56:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree.
Expensive burnt water at that.

McDonalds isn't bad though..

They switched brands or something a few years back, and the new (?) stuff is much
better. The old stuff was atrocious.

Their sausage biscuit is the only thing on their menu worth buying, as far as I'm
concerned.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior
drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises
are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling.

My wife likes their salads - and the bathrooms. I've seen their senior coffees for
anywhere between $.50 and $.85. If I'm on a long ride, they're a great place to stop
for a break.


I can eat a sausage and egg on a hamburger bun, if they will do it but
I am not much of a muffin or biscuit guy.
Too dry.
McD doesn't have much on the lunch menu I like if I want more than a
salad.
I really like the S/E/C on a croissant at the Burger King but I
suspect that is a heart attack in a bag. The thing seems to be
dripping in butter.
I am not really in love with any "fast food" fries. The best ones were
at Sonny's BBQ but I haven't been there for a while. I imagine the
health nuts may have changed the formula by now.
I think they used to use lard.


If I get the sausage and egg it's with a small orange juice for moisture!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


I think their cheese tastes funny. So no egg and cheese things.

  #140   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2015
Posts: 920
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

True North wrote:
Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
"Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games
here."


I wholeheartedly agree with this post.
The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking
orders that underlings were forced to obey.


Even as dumb as you are, you should know that you have to back up your
statements.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kauai Chickes and "Stand yer' Ground!!" Tim General 4 February 28th 14 05:01 AM
In Chicago, Anti Assault Weapon Candidate Wins Special Election F.O.A.D. General 9 March 2nd 13 05:41 PM
"Stand by me"... great arrangement... John H[_2_] General 0 October 19th 10 08:39 PM
What does "PO" stand for? Roger Long Cruising 1 May 31st 06 07:09 PM
Assault weapon ban enf not good enough Joe ASA 71 October 14th 04 10:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017