|
Floriduh
|
Floriduh
|
Floriduh
|
Floriduh
|
Floriduh
In article ,
says... On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:34:11 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:27:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Citizens rights include not following the orders of Law Enforcement? He was told to stay in his car. When? You are just making **** up now., . That is the same thing that Kevin guy used to do! Maybe there's no difference between, "We don?t need you to do that," and, "Stay in your car!" Here, idiot: "It's irrelevant to what happened on Feb. 26, does not change material facts of the situation, specifically that had George Zimmerman not left his vehicle and heeded the police dispatcher's guidance, we wouldn't be here today," Julison said |
Floriduh
On 3/27/12 12:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/27/2012 11:34 AM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:27:17 -0400, wrote: Citizens rights include not following the orders of Law Enforcement? He was told to stay in his car. When? You are just making **** up now., That is Plum's MO... Zimmerman was clearly told by the police dispatcher to stay in his car. The transcripts were readily available, and that is one of the statements that was perfectly clear. |
Floriduh
In article ,
says... On 3/27/12 12:25 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/27/2012 11:34 AM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:27:17 -0400, wrote: Citizens rights include not following the orders of Law Enforcement? He was told to stay in his car. When? You are just making **** up now., That is Plum's MO... Zimmerman was clearly told by the police dispatcher to stay in his car. The transcripts were readily available, and that is one of the statements that was perfectly clear. Add to that the numbskulls here haven't realized that the No Duty to Retreat law could also be the law that finds Martin was doing just that, so Zimmerman would be able to be prosecuted. |
Floriduh
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:18:12 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:36:08 -0400, BAR wrote: There is no evidence that Zimmerman ever approached Martin. It appears the opposite is true. He says he was jumped from behind. No evidence yet. Zimmerman is the defendant The state has to prove it is not true. We know from the girlfriends phone transcript, Martin approached Zimmerman Fat guys with BMIs of over 36 do not "pursue", certainly not fast enough to catch a 17 year old football star who wants to get away. What was the kid supposed to do, allow the guy to come and attack him? How was Martin supposed to know that the guy wasn't some thug wanting to rob him, or kill him? When Zimmerman asked him what he was doing there the first time, all Martin had to say was "I'm going to my father's house, he lives at 168 Maple Dr., call him if you don't believe me." Game over, and you guys wouldn't be having this argument. Since ya'll are so wound up about this, here's another take on it that I just happened to have run across. Interesting. http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-765534 |
Floriduh
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:26:24 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 3/27/12 11:19 AM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:36:08 -0400, wrote: There is no evidence that Zimmerman ever approached Martin. It appears the opposite is true. He says he was jumped from behind. No evidence yet. Zimmerman is the defendant The state has to prove it is not true. We know from the girlfriends phone transcript, Martin approached Zimmerman Fat guys with BMIs of over 36 do not "pursue", certainly not fast enough to catch a 17 year old football star who wants to get away. Zimmerman is a defendant? When was he arrested and arraigned? Oh wow, he's a football star now. Paint him as a big black kid 6'2" football star. He was 140 lbs. A skinny kid pursued by a fat **** with a gun. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com