|
Floriduh
|
Floriduh
On 3/26/2012 10:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:10:47 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 3/26/12 9:01 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:31:51 -0400, wrote: In , says... Watching someone from your truck is not pursuit, it is watching. If it turns out Martin approached the truck, he was the pursuer. When Zimmerman got out of his truck he initiated pursuit. Zimmerman could have driven away and let the police handle the situation. Zimmerman escalated the situation which resulted in Martin's death. Zimmerman says he never approached or pursued Martin, he got out of the truck to read a road sign. You can't fault a teenager for looking into a car, it is what they do. When you have had dozens of car burglaries, that is suspicious. The transcript from the gir;lfriend seems to support that. The initial contact was Martin confronting Zimmerman in that call. You mean Martin confronted a man who got of his car and pursued Martin. Zimmerman is the adult in this whole situation and he should have shown better judgment. There is no evidence that Zimmerman ever approached Martin. It appears the opposite is true. He says he was jumped from behind. Of course he says that. And you believe him. The Sanford Police believe him and a few of us are still willing to wait to see if the FBI believes him. It is the people who have already made up their mind that he chased Martin down and shot him (some even believe, in the back) who are doing the lynching. Nobody Believes Martin was shot in the back, but bigots and racists will say it anyway because it suits their agenda. The hypocrisy is in their willingness to take away a citizens rights in the name of someone elses... People on the left came to this story with the same kind of prejudice that was common 60 years ago in Mississippi when a black man killed a white man. |
Floriduh
On 3/26/12 10:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:10:47 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 3/26/12 9:01 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:31:51 -0400, wrote: In , says... Watching someone from your truck is not pursuit, it is watching. If it turns out Martin approached the truck, he was the pursuer. When Zimmerman got out of his truck he initiated pursuit. Zimmerman could have driven away and let the police handle the situation. Zimmerman escalated the situation which resulted in Martin's death. Zimmerman says he never approached or pursued Martin, he got out of the truck to read a road sign. You can't fault a teenager for looking into a car, it is what they do. When you have had dozens of car burglaries, that is suspicious. The transcript from the gir;lfriend seems to support that. The initial contact was Martin confronting Zimmerman in that call. You mean Martin confronted a man who got of his car and pursued Martin. Zimmerman is the adult in this whole situation and he should have shown better judgment. There is no evidence that Zimmerman ever approached Martin. It appears the opposite is true. He says he was jumped from behind. Of course he says that. And you believe him. The Sanford Police believe him and a few of us are still willing to wait to see if the FBI believes him. It is the people who have already made up their mind that he chased Martin down and shot him (some even believe, in the back) who are doing the lynching. People on the left came to this story with the same kind of prejudice that was common 60 years ago in Mississippi when a black man killed a white man. The Sanford police have a long history of anti-black prejudice. Even the chief, now on paid leave, admits that. |
Floriduh
|
Floriduh
|
Floriduh
On 3/27/2012 7:28 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:48:40 -0700, wrote: All one needs to know is that Zimmerman pursued the eventual victim, after being told to stand down and wait for police. Not true. The exact words were "we don't NEED you to do that". There was never a comment that he shouldn't. This fat **** needed to stay in his car. A 17 year old kid would be alive and no one would want to skin his fat ass alive. If the kid had just kept walking he would be alive too but he chose to turn around and attack Zimmerman because he did not like the way he was looking at him. The kid would have been still been alive is Zimmerman had not gotten out of his vehicle and pursued the kid. Zimmerman initiated the entire incident. Too much bull**** to know that... First off, Zimmerman is not "white" as the New York Lies suggests, and why do they keep showing three year old pictures of Martin? Could it be that he is a lot bigger and more imposing now? The media has not given any of you the facts, that's why the FBI is in there... Hopefully Holder's racist Dept of Justice for Black Panthers and associates doesn't get any more involved, that's just campaign hookeybookey... |
Floriduh
On 3/27/12 7:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/27/2012 7:28 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:48:40 -0700, wrote: All one needs to know is that Zimmerman pursued the eventual victim, after being told to stand down and wait for police. Not true. The exact words were "we don't NEED you to do that". There was never a comment that he shouldn't. This fat **** needed to stay in his car. A 17 year old kid would be alive and no one would want to skin his fat ass alive. If the kid had just kept walking he would be alive too but he chose to turn around and attack Zimmerman because he did not like the way he was looking at him. The kid would have been still been alive is Zimmerman had not gotten out of his vehicle and pursued the kid. Zimmerman initiated the entire incident. Too much bull**** to know that... First off, Zimmerman is not "white" as the New York Lies suggests, and why do they keep showing three year old pictures of Martin? Could it be that he is a lot bigger and more imposing now? The media has not given any of you the facts, that's why the FBI is in there... Hopefully Holder's racist Dept of Justice for Black Panthers and associates doesn't get any more involved, that's just campaign hookeybookey... You know, Little Toad, these "portraits" you offer up of how your "mind" works are fascinating. Do you ever read what you post before you post? 1. There have been "newer" photos of the murder victim show. I don't know whether I've seen one of him taken in the last six months. His height and weight, however, have been disclosed. The victim was much smaller than the murderer. 2. The FBI is not involved in the case now because "the media" has not given us the facts. As a point of fact, plenty of facts about this tragedy have been disclosed by the media. 3. On the one hand, you seem to like the idea that the FBI is involved because you claim the media has not given up the facts and on the other hand you call the Department of Justice (and therefore the FBI, which is part of the DOJ) racist. 4. Gotta love your insane "affiliation" of the DOJ with the Black Panthers. You really need to wean yourself off the bat**** crazy right-wing propaganda channels and websites. |
Floriduh
On 3/27/2012 8:15 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/27/12 7:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/27/2012 7:28 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:48:40 -0700, wrote: All one needs to know is that Zimmerman pursued the eventual victim, after being told to stand down and wait for police. Not true. The exact words were "we don't NEED you to do that". There was never a comment that he shouldn't. This fat **** needed to stay in his car. A 17 year old kid would be alive and no one would want to skin his fat ass alive. If the kid had just kept walking he would be alive too but he chose to turn around and attack Zimmerman because he did not like the way he was looking at him. The kid would have been still been alive is Zimmerman had not gotten out of his vehicle and pursued the kid. Zimmerman initiated the entire incident. Too much bull**** to know that... First off, Zimmerman is not "white" as the New York Lies suggests, and why do they keep showing three year old pictures of Martin? Could it be that he is a lot bigger and more imposing now? The media has not given any of you the facts, that's why the FBI is in there... Hopefully Holder's racist Dept of Justice for Black Panthers and associates doesn't get any more involved, that's just campaign hookeybookey... You know, Little Toad, You know you fat ass piece of dog ****... I don't read your posts... |
Floriduh
On 3/27/12 8:21 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/27/2012 8:15 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/27/12 7:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/27/2012 7:28 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:48:40 -0700, wrote: All one needs to know is that Zimmerman pursued the eventual victim, after being told to stand down and wait for police. Not true. The exact words were "we don't NEED you to do that". There was never a comment that he shouldn't. This fat **** needed to stay in his car. A 17 year old kid would be alive and no one would want to skin his fat ass alive. If the kid had just kept walking he would be alive too but he chose to turn around and attack Zimmerman because he did not like the way he was looking at him. The kid would have been still been alive is Zimmerman had not gotten out of his vehicle and pursued the kid. Zimmerman initiated the entire incident. Too much bull**** to know that... First off, Zimmerman is not "white" as the New York Lies suggests, and why do they keep showing three year old pictures of Martin? Could it be that he is a lot bigger and more imposing now? The media has not given any of you the facts, that's why the FBI is in there... Hopefully Holder's racist Dept of Justice for Black Panthers and associates doesn't get any more involved, that's just campaign hookeybookey... You know, Little Toad, You know you fat ass piece of dog ****... I don't read your posts... Bull****. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com