On 03/12/2011 6:49 AM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 3-Dec-2011, wrote:

DUH!!!

christ. what the **** happened to conservatives who dont even know how
to count to FIVE???

Rates are not low because demand is high.

Rates are low because US Fed lends out at 0%. Banks don't need to pay
interest to savers if they can get free money. There is no balance in
the lend-borrow market place.

And how if ****s you? Social security gets maybe 1% on the money it
lends to government. 6% is real unadjusted inflation. So in fact
Social Security loses 5% value per year.

Say $1000 in SS gets $10 interest. But it takes $1060 to buy the same
stuff a year later. In value terms Social security is being skimmed by
DC.

Yep, they will collect more and pay out less in the long term.

Worse of t-bill holders using real money. You lend $1000 and get 1%,
$10. But it takes $1060 to buy he same stuff a year later. But wait,
you have to pay tax on the $10. So in fact you lose more than 5%.

Whole scale Bernanke-0bama fraud really. A zero rate economy of
depreciating value of money.

And part of why your going to be so ****ed in the end. Government isn't
going to be able to increase your social security, Medicare and other
benefits with inflation money print.

But you are just too ****ing stupid to see it. Good 0bama sheeples.
--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

...might as well understand you're responding to a 55 I.Q.

I think your being generous. Perhaps 55 if we add bpuharic and harryk
together.
--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On 3-Dec-2011, Canuck57 wrote:

...might as well understand you're responding to a 55 I.Q.

I think your being generous. Perhaps 55 if we add bpuharic and harryk
together.

Thank you, I try to be generous.

On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:35:53 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 3-Dec-2011, Canuck57 wrote:

...might as well understand you're responding to a 55 I.Q.

I think your being generous. Perhaps 55 if we add bpuharic and harryk
together.

Thank you, I try to be generous.

You're hoping the US goes down because you're invested in it. While
you're not completely wrong, your dire predictions are hyperbolic.
It'll take decades for the US to fade, which it will indeed do if we
continue to **** money on bombs and bullets.

On 4-Dec-2011, jps wrote:

I think your being generous. Perhaps 55 if we add bpuharic and harryk
together.

Thank you, I try to be generous.

You're hoping the US goes down because you're invested in it. While
you're not completely wrong, your dire predictions are hyperbolic.
It'll take decades for the US to fade, which it will indeed do if we
continue to **** money on bombs and bullets.

You grossly overestimate how much I, and the rest of the world, care about
the future of the former United States. Ever been anywhere? "Americans"
(whatever the hell those are any more) are so ignorant about the world. To
you the world consists of moronic TV shows, cheap cell phones, $12.00/gallon
factory water and lottery tickets. That's why you're history.

On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:33:43 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 4-Dec-2011, jps wrote:

I think your being generous. Perhaps 55 if we add bpuharic and harryk
together.

Thank you, I try to be generous.

You're hoping the US goes down because you're invested in it. While
you're not completely wrong, your dire predictions are hyperbolic.
It'll take decades for the US to fade, which it will indeed do if we
continue to **** money on bombs and bullets.

You grossly overestimate how much I, and the rest of the world, care about
the future of the former United States. Ever been anywhere? "Americans"
(whatever the hell those are any more) are so ignorant about the world. To
you the world consists of moronic TV shows, cheap cell phones, $12.00/gallon
factory water and lottery tickets. That's why you're history.

I expect you're speaking of the royal "you" since I don't watch stupid
television shows and I do travel. I'm completely aware of the rest of
the world and how stupid America looks right now.

But go ahead and paint me with your broad brush, because you know so
much.

On 6-Dec-2011, jps wrote:

You grossly overestimate how much I, and the rest of the world, care
about
the future of the former United States. Ever been anywhere? "Americans"
(whatever the hell those are any more) are so ignorant about the world.
To
you the world consists of moronic TV shows, cheap cell phones,
$12.00/gallon
factory water and lottery tickets. That's why you're history.

I expect you're speaking of the royal "you" since I don't watch stupid
television shows and I do travel. I'm completely aware of the rest of
the world and how stupid America looks right now.

Congratulations - you're nearly functional, except for the fact that you
prefer to go down with the ship.

On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:55:12 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 6-Dec-2011, jps wrote:

You grossly overestimate how much I, and the rest of the world, care
about
the future of the former United States. Ever been anywhere? "Americans"
(whatever the hell those are any more) are so ignorant about the world.
To
you the world consists of moronic TV shows, cheap cell phones,
$12.00/gallon
factory water and lottery tickets. That's why you're history.

I expect you're speaking of the royal "you" since I don't watch stupid
television shows and I do travel. I'm completely aware of the rest of
the world and how stupid America looks right now.

Congratulations - you're nearly functional, except for the fact that you
prefer to go down with the ship.

I have two teenage kids and a growing, functional business that I've
been building for 20 years. My property value is increasing and I
live in one of the most picturesque parts of the country where there's
nearly limitless opportunity for outdoor recreation including boating
and skiing.

Am I pleased with the direction of our country? Nope. Have I given
up hope? Nope.