the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

On 11/25/11 7:52 PM, bpuharic wrote:
the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

It's nice to see, but I wouldn't too much credence to any polls this far
out. Still, it is fun to see just how crappy most of the GOP wannabe's are.




--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug

On 11/25/2011 7:52 PM, bpuharic wrote:
the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1
Is that like the rules of Hoyle or what?

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 11/25/11 7:52 PM, bpuharic wrote:
the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

It's nice to see, but I wouldn't too much credence to any polls this far
out. Still, it is fun to see just how crappy most of the GOP wannabe's are.

Oh, Don, you may want to chastise your asshole buddy for his first
sentence. Writer my ass.

On 25-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

Just like 2008. Run a subversive against an empty suit, the subversive wins
every time. Will you losers EVER get a clue about what you're doing wrong?

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:08:24 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 25-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

Just like 2008. Run a subversive against an empty suit, the subversive wins
every time. Will you losers EVER get a clue about what you're doing wrong?

A subversive? You taking knock-off drugs from China?

On 11/28/11 3:51 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:08:24 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 25-Nov-2011, wrote:

the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

Just like 2008. Run a subversive against an empty suit, the subversive wins
every time. Will you losers EVER get a clue about what you're doing wrong?

A subversive? You taking knock-off drugs from China?


Some of these right-wing morons shouldn't have reading privileges. Obama
is about as middle of the road as a politician can be these days.


If the RepubliThugs nominate any of the frontrunners besides Romney, I'd
give at least 2 to 1 odds favoring Obama's victory. Romney is the only
formidable national candidate on the frontrunner list. Obama will bury
him, too, but not by as wide a margin.

Of course, we also have to get the right-wing retards out of the House.




--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:08:24 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 25-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

Just like 2008. Run a subversive against an empty suit, the subversive wins
every time. Will you losers EVER get a clue about what you're doing wrong?

god only knows who a 'subversive' is...your tin foil hat slip?

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:00:45 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:51 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:08:24 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 25-Nov-2011, wrote:

the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

Just like 2008. Run a subversive against an empty suit, the subversive wins
every time. Will you losers EVER get a clue about what you're doing wrong?

A subversive? You taking knock-off drugs from China?


Some of these right-wing morons shouldn't have reading privileges. Obama
is about as middle of the road as a politician can be these days.

they have 'em

they just don't use 'em

faux news makes it too easy to drool while watching TV and eating ring
baloney

On 28-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

On 25-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

Just like 2008. Run a subversive against an empty suit, the subversive
wins
every time. Will you losers EVER get a clue about what you're doing
wrong?

god only knows who a 'subversive' is...your tin foil hat slip?

Perhaps you should buy a dictionary? Maybe there's one on your Chinese play
telephone; reading it may be another challenge for you. You might be stuck
at "heyyy wuzzup?"

As it relates to this topic, a subversive is a person who, despite knowing
his shortcomings, strives to stay in the position that he has, trying to
turn a once functional country into the USSR of the 70's. (You'll be lucky
with that outcome)

A subversive is a person that refuses to tell the ass clowns in the U.S. to
stop sending their money overseas for autos and most household purchases,
while promising more handouts that have to be financed by other countries.

A subversive is a person that pretends to "care" about jobs and "the
economy" while maintaining one way trade agreements with Japan, Korea and
China, while the serfs (ignorant of that status) squeal for handouts.

A subversive is a person that travels to various countries and tells them
that the U.S. has many things in its history to be sorry for, and apologize
for those alleged transgressions. (too many big words here?)

A subversive is a person that relentlessly spends nonexistent money to buy
votes from a core (and corrupt) voting block. A subversive is NOT someone
that does that out of shear ignorance. Tyrants are rarely meek.

A subversive is a person that believes that the productive population is
bad; that the non-producers are preyed upon, and that he'll correct that by
punishing the producers.

As most of the secondary commenter's in this topic appear to be sheepish
sycophants, you probably can't understand the destructiveness of this
behavior. That's your problem; most of the productive have already had to
flee your country...economic refugees.

In 2012, the opposing criminal party will run another empty suit (but maybe
not senile this time) and you get Obama and Aunt Esther for 4 more years.
Being compassionate, I understand how frustrated you are while getting
inexorably screwed. This condition is not because of the "elected"
subversive, but because of ignorance, superstition and sloth of those that
bother to "vote" for president. (you don't do that either - did you now
that?)