AP-GfK Poll conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate
Communications. March 24-28, 2011. N=1,001 adults nationwide. Margin of
error ± 4.2. Trend includes surveys conducted with CNBC.


"Overall, please tell me whether you approve, disapprove, or neither
approve nor disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
president."




3/24-28/11 53% Approve, 45% Disapprove



11/18-22/10 48% Approve, 48% Disapprove

On Mar 31, 3:25*pm, Harryk wrote:
AP-GfK Poll conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate
Communications. March 24-28, 2011. N=1,001 adults nationwide. Margin of
error ± 4.2. Trend includes surveys conducted with CNBC.

"Overall, please tell me whether you approve, disapprove, or neither
approve nor disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
president."

3/24-28/11 * * *53% Approve, 45% Disapprove * * * * * *

11/18-22/10 * * 48% Approve, 48% Disapprove * *

They obviously haven't read that news story I posted the link for,
huh??

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:25:02 -0400, Harryk
wrote:



AP-GfK Poll conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate
Communications. March 24-28, 2011. N=1,001 adults nationwide. Margin of
error ± 4.2. Trend includes surveys conducted with CNBC.


"Overall, please tell me whether you approve, disapprove, or neither
approve nor disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
president."




3/24-28/11 53% Approve, 45% Disapprove



11/18-22/10 48% Approve, 48% Disapprove

Thus, he's a socialist.

wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:25:02 -0400,
wrote:


AP-GfK Poll conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs& Corporate
Communications. March 24-28, 2011. N=1,001 adults nationwide. Margin of
error ± 4.2. Trend includes surveys conducted with CNBC.


"Overall, please tell me whether you approve, disapprove, or neither
approve nor disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
president."




3/24-28/11 53% Approve, 45% Disapprove



11/18-22/10 48% Approve, 48% Disapprove

Thus, he's a socialist.

A half black basketball playing muslim socialist.

On 31/03/2011 1:25 PM, Harryk wrote:


AP-GfK Poll conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate
Communications. March 24-28, 2011. N=1,001 adults nationwide. Margin of
error ± 4.2. Trend includes surveys conducted with CNBC.


"Overall, please tell me whether you approve, disapprove, or neither
approve nor disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
president."




3/24-28/11 53% Approve, 45% Disapprove



11/18-22/10 48% Approve, 48% Disapprove

A better link:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-50-years.html

Just shows there is a lot of stupid people out there that think Obama
grows money or something strange.

My guess is Obama will destroy the US economy with currency devaluation
and hyper inflation. Accumulate the debt under the US Fed and then just
declare the US Fed. Reserve bankrupt. Then watch the USD plummet.

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:08:49 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

O

My guess is Obama will destroy the US economy with currency devaluation
and hyper inflation. Accumulate the debt under the US Fed and then just
declare the US Fed. Reserve bankrupt. Then watch the USD plummet.

your rich pals on wall street sucked 10 TRILLION out of the economy in
3 years.

they already destroyed america

fortunately, canada, less in thrall to plutocrats, is not having our
problems

On 31/03/2011 7:16 PM, bob wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:08:49 -0600,
wrote:

O

My guess is Obama will destroy the US economy with currency devaluation
and hyper inflation. Accumulate the debt under the US Fed and then just
declare the US Fed. Reserve bankrupt. Then watch the USD plummet.

your rich pals on wall street sucked 10 TRILLION out of the economy in
3 years.

they already destroyed america

fortunately, canada, less in thrall to plutocrats, is not having our
problems

Funny, none of my buddies asked for nor did they take bailouts. Ask
Obama about that and why Bin Laden's investment in Carlyle, a major GM
holder of paper needed a bailout of GM so bad. Better not tick of his
Saudi masters now.

DC corruption was responsible and that is a fact. I don't argue some
super rich knobs are not corrupt, hell, 1/2 of them are. Ask any
Congress 2006=2010 -- bet they got calls from all sorts. Citing which
banks they had cash in as to see who got bailouts and who didn't.

But it all comes back to government corruption.

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:39:44 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 31/03/2011 7:16 PM, bob wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:08:49 -0600,
wrote:

O

My guess is Obama will destroy the US economy with currency devaluation
and hyper inflation. Accumulate the debt under the US Fed and then just
declare the US Fed. Reserve bankrupt. Then watch the USD plummet.

your rich pals on wall street sucked 10 TRILLION out of the economy in
3 years.

they already destroyed america

fortunately, canada, less in thrall to plutocrats, is not having our
problems

Funny, none of my buddies asked for nor did they take bailouts.

that's exactly my point. canada regulated its rich more than the US
did. that's why your economy didnt tank like ours did. americans are
fundamentalists on religion AND economics...preferring the rich and
powerful in both cases

Ask
Obama about that and why Bin Laden's investment in Carlyle, a major GM
holder of paper needed a bailout of GM so bad. Better not tick of his
Saudi masters now.

funny that the first thing bush did after 9/11 was arrange for bin
laden's american family to get out of the country

But it all comes back to government corruption.

and america makes corruption the law....but only by the rich

On 01/04/2011 4:12 AM, bob wrote:

Funny, none of my buddies asked for nor did they take bailouts.

that's exactly my point. canada regulated its rich more than the US
did. that's why your economy didnt tank like ours did. americans are
fundamentalists on religion AND economics...preferring the rich and
powerful in both cases

Bullsh1t. Canada bailed out banks just like the US did. $75 billion to
start with a $50 billion possible over run. Very hush hush but the
debts are there. GM & Chrysler got their piece too as did others.
Magna for example was owed $1.6 billion by GM, part of the negotiations
was that Magna would be bailed, you know Belinda's daddy.

Canada followed suit the same way. Just the PR by CBC and in the
political pocket media didn't make the ado of it as the Americans did.

So basically a minimum wage and no pension worker is bailing out
GM/Banks/corruption and has some mix of higher taxes and elss services.
Is that fair?

Ask
Obama about that and why Bin Laden's investment in Carlyle, a major GM
holder of paper needed a bailout of GM so bad. Better not tick of his
Saudi masters now.

funny that the first thing bush did after 9/11 was arrange for bin
laden's american family to get out of the country

But it all comes back to government corruption.

and america makes corruption the law....but only by the rich

So does Canada. US illegally starts an unprovoked war with Libya, backs
the UN to overthrow governments with UN backing in Ivory Coast... Canada
does the same. Take a look at CIDA payouts, looks like a UN pork fest
multi billion dollar corruption stream.... Hundreds of front companies
in the pile getting Canadian taxpayers money.

Canada and the US government are two very corrupt governments. And hey
work together. I didn't see Ignatieff or Layton once talk against
Harper's following US policy. Power and greedy pull Obama's strings,
Obama has strings to Harper. If Harper gets out of line, Liberals will
see more cash to get Iggy, Obama's Harvard man in place.

Corrupt as hell.

bob wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:08:49 -0600,
wrote:


O

My guess is Obama will destroy the US economy with currency devaluation
and hyper inflation. Accumulate the debt under the US Fed and then just
declare the US Fed. Reserve bankrupt. Then watch the USD plummet.

your rich pals on wall street sucked 10 TRILLION out of the economy in
3 years.

they already destroyed america

fortunately, canada, less in thrall to plutocrats, is not having our
problems

Changed your "handle", eh? WAFA won't like that...