On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:56:22 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 28-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

On 25-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

the conservative rasmussen poll shows obama beating romney by 6
points, his widest lead to date:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=D969-1

Just like 2008. Run a subversive against an empty suit, the subversive
wins
every time. Will you losers EVER get a clue about what you're doing
wrong?

god only knows who a 'subversive' is...your tin foil hat slip?

Perhaps you should buy a dictionary? Maybe there's one on your Chinese play
telephone; reading it may be another challenge for you. You might be stuck
at "heyyy wuzzup?"

oh. you're so stupid you think labeling someone subversive CAUSES them
to BE so.

interesting


As it relates to this topic, a subversive is a person who, despite knowing
his shortcomings, strives to stay in the position that he has, trying to
turn a once functional country into the USSR of the 70's. (You'll be lucky
with that outcome)

strike 1. no one in politics today fits that description

so my aforementioned reference to tin foil hat fits


A subversive is a person that refuses to tell the ass clowns in the U.S. to
stop sending their money overseas for autos and most household purchases,
while promising more handouts that have to be financed by other countries.

sounds like the True Believers in the wall street cult trying to
destroy the US to keep the rich rich

strike 2


A subversive is a person that pretends to "care" about jobs and "the
economy" while maintaining one way trade agreements with Japan, Korea and
China, while the serfs (ignorant of that status) squeal for handouts.

let's see...virtually every president in recent history has signed
trade agreements

strike three. you're out, moron


A subversive is a person that travels to various countries and tells them
that the U.S. has many things in its history to be sorry for, and apologize
for those alleged transgressions. (too many big words here?)

since he never apologized NOW you're moving into blatant lying


A subversive is a person that relentlessly spends nonexistent money to buy
votes from a core (and corrupt) voting block. A subversive is NOT someone
that does that out of shear ignorance. Tyrants are rarely meek.

hmmm...so tell me more about why you hate bush who racked up a 1.2
TRILLION deficit in his last budget

A subversive is a person that believes that the productive population is
bad; that the non-producers are preyed upon, and that he'll correct that by
punishing the producers.

yes, the right wing does hate the productive middle class and wants to
deregulate the parasites on wall street

so you're saying CONSERVATVES are subversive?

who knew!!


As most of the secondary commenter's in this topic appear to be sheepish
sycophants, you probably can't understand the destructiveness of this
behavior. That's your problem; most of the productive have already had to
flee your country...economic refugees.

all you've done is describe the destructive behavior of america's
conservatives as they wage class warfare against the middle class

but i never thought of them as 'subversive'

just stupid....idiotic

but not subservive. they're not smart enough to do that


In 2012, the opposing criminal party will run another empty suit (but maybe
not senile this time) and you get Obama and Aunt Esther for 4 more years.
Being compassionate, I understand how frustrated you are while getting
inexorably screwed. This condition is not because of the "elected"
subversive, but because of ignorance, superstition and sloth of those that
bother to "vote" for president. (you don't do that either - did you now
that?)

let's see. right wing judicial activiists in the 'citizens united'
decision decided corporations are people and can buy elections

and somehow you missed THOSE 'subversives'...

like i said...you dont know what a 'subversive' is

On 28-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

god only knows who a 'subversive' is...your tin foil hat slip?

Perhaps you should buy a dictionary? Maybe there's one on your Chinese
play
telephone; reading it may be another challenge for you. You might be
stuck
at "heyyy wuzzup?"

oh. you're so stupid you think labeling someone subversive CAUSES them
to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem. Probably also a product of your government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half way
between **** and syphilis.

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:32:18 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 28-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

god only knows who a 'subversive' is...your tin foil hat slip?

Perhaps you should buy a dictionary? Maybe there's one on your Chinese
play
telephone; reading it may be another challenge for you. You might be
stuck
at "heyyy wuzzup?"

oh. you're so stupid you think labeling someone subversive CAUSES them
to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem.

yeah right whiners generally say that when confronted by truth


Probably also a product of your government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half way
between **** and syphilis.

all of which are pandemic in conservative ideology

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:32:18 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 28-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

god only knows who a 'subversive' is...your tin foil hat slip?

Perhaps you should buy a dictionary? Maybe there's one on your Chinese
play
telephone; reading it may be another challenge for you. You might be
stuck
at "heyyy wuzzup?"

oh. you're so stupid you think labeling someone subversive CAUSES them
to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem. Probably also a product of your government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half way
between **** and syphilis.

And of what schools are you a product?

On 11/29/11 12:47 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:32:18 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 28-Nov-2011, wrote:

god only knows who a 'subversive' is...your tin foil hat slip?

Perhaps you should buy a dictionary? Maybe there's one on your Chinese
play
telephone; reading it may be another challenge for you. You might be
stuck
at "heyyy wuzzup?"

oh. you're so stupid you think labeling someone subversive CAUSES them
to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem. Probably also a product of your government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half way
between **** and syphilis.

And of what schools are you a product?


Reform schools, odiously.

--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug

On 28-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem.

yeah right whiners generally say that when confronted by truth

I explained in detail how the mindless voters in your country have trashed
your country - you repsond with the juvenile right, left, repub democrap
crap - what you have done is contributed to my point.




Probably also a product of your government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half way
between **** and syphilis.

all of which are pandemic in conservative ideology

On 29-Nov-2011, X ` Man wrote:

to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem. Probably also a product of your
government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half
way
between **** and syphilis.

And of what schools are you a product?


Reform schools, odiously.

You loons are seriously funny, and don't even know it. Keep voting for
corruption - you deserve the outcome. Natural selection will obviously
prevail. I DO recall 25+ years ago when your country still had a chance.

On 11/29/2011 7:33 AM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 29-Nov-2011, X ` wrote:

to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem. Probably also a product of your
government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half
way
between **** and syphilis.

And of what schools are you a product?


Reform schools, odiously.

You loons are seriously funny, and don't even know it. Keep voting for
corruption - you deserve the outcome. Natural selection will obviously
prevail. I DO recall 25+ years ago when your country still had a chance.

If you want feign intellectualism you might try substituting odiously in
place of obviously.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:33:08 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 29-Nov-2011, X ` Man wrote:

to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem. Probably also a product of your
government
schools. I'd have sympathy, but it only exists in a dictionary, half
way
between **** and syphilis.

And of what schools are you a product?


Reform schools, odiously.

You loons are seriously funny, and don't even know it. Keep voting for
corruption - you deserve the outcome. Natural selection will obviously
prevail. I DO recall 25+ years ago when your country still had a chance.

It was your country and you were educated here, right? That was just
before you became a mercantile whore for money? You expect us to be
patriotic but you can take your marbles and go pimp yourself?

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:30:44 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 28-Nov-2011, bpuharic wrote:

to BE so.

interesting

I see, a comprehension problem.

yeah right whiners generally say that when confronted by truth

I explained in detail how the mindless voters in your country have trashed
your country - you repsond with the juvenile right, left, repub democrap
crap - what you have done is contributed to my point.

Your claptrap is derived from the right-wing cesspool that launches
most "libertarian" spewfests.