On 9/26/2011 7:54 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 26/09/2011 5:18 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/26/2011 1:55 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 26/09/2011 10:33 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:41:09 -0600,
wrote:

Abortions don't create starving illiterate homeless children
turning to
crime either.

Nuck, you have a point
Maybe they are just not framing the issue correctly.
They should say abortion is the most effective way to increase the
high school graduation rate, cut the crime rate and reduce the number
of people on welfare.

And Africa/Haiti are good examples of what happens with excessive ouof
control breeding of unsupportable children. Decay results as population
over runs resources.

But the reality is religion uses this as a way to out populate the
competition. No secret why Catholics are officially not to use birth
control.

In fact, in the past kings would have wars to deal with young population
growth to cut down the young aggressive male population and maintain
control for their kingdoms.

Why do people think the middle east and parts of Africa are a mess?
Somalia for example, go in there 20 year ago and feed, they breed and
now the problem is worse as you have a new crop of gang banging thugs
hyped up on the need for violence in their misery.


So your answer is government funded, and protected "violence"? Remember,
the government pays for abortions, but won't even discuss
alternatives... Again, with no opposition at all, what are you all
crying about?

So who is going to pay for the alternatives? Oh, you want me to pay.
Nothing to stop the pro-lifers to offer to pay these women to term for
their keep and compensation for missing a year of school or whatever. Or
perhaps pay for 20 years of support. Some might take you up on it if
they thought you were credible.

So, because it's cheaper for you to pay for an abortion, you are cool
with that? Figures, most progressives look at the purse first...


Present alternatives yes, discuss alternatives is just verbal bullying.
While I am not a woman, I would bet a pregnant woman takes it seriously
and didn't go to an abortion clinic by accident. No need to bully the
choices a doctor and the woman should make.

But we all know religious pushy gets.

We all know progressives get pushy, and if they don't get their way,
they get violent and criminal, what's your point?

On 26/09/2011 5:58 PM, JustWait wrote:

So, because it's cheaper for you to pay for an abortion, you are cool
with that? Figures, most progressives look at the purse first...

I have heard it said it takes $250,000 in todays dollars to raise a
child property. Food, medical, dental, cloths, school fees, books,
computers, sports.....and more I have likely missed. Plus the cost of
yourself.

So you are a fool if you think money doesn't mater. Say your 16, old
man kicks you out because your knocked up or no resources for another
kid, you haven't finished high school or college, boyfriend is a dead
beat and gone. There you sit, you have to decide. Here comes some pro
lifers that will not be around for the next 20 years advising her that
she would be a murder for aborting a 3mm long fetus that has no heart
and no brain it is months off from developing.

So why not get an abortion, continue with school after a few sick days,
put your life together then when married, stable and fiscal income then
have them? Sure beats living on welfare in the slums for 20 years to life.

--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs.
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude