Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act. Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so. Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300 indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple countries...Osama just needed a bullet. Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts. Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets were the ones sent to Osama. -- I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with fleabagger debt. Take a look at ANY country, more debt more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act. Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so. Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300 indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple countries...Osama just needed a bullet. Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts. Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets were the ones sent to Osama. Just think of it as campaign finance... -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act. Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so. Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300 indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple countries...Osama just needed a bullet. Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts. Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets were the ones sent to Osama. I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not targeting people for assassination. Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000 troops. It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they made the right choice and blew his head off on site. Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story. There was no such repeal of any policy. We target people all the time. I believe it's mostly appropriate, given what they've done or are doing. So, you're claiming to know all the details of the raid, including the motion by motion action? Sounds to me like you really don't give Obama an "A". Rather, you're just looking for a way to put him down. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act. Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so. Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300 indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple countries...Osama just needed a bullet. Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts. Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets were the ones sent to Osama. I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not targeting people for assassination. Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000 troops. It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they made the right choice and blew his head off on site. Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story. Ah yes, but was it 'a return to American values'? Don't you think there are a whole lot of disappointed ACLU lawyers now? If 'hurting' the prisoners at Gitmo is 'inhumane' and violates their 'civil rights', how can shooting one be any better? If I were a liberal (which I'm not), and if I were glad we shot Osama (which I am), then I'd have a hard time reconciling the shooting of the guy. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, wrote: On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act. Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so. Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300 indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple countries...Osama just needed a bullet. Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts. Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets were the ones sent to Osama. I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not targeting people for assassination. Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000 troops. It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they made the right choice and blew his head off on site. Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story. I prefer to deal with what we know...or were told. We were told Osama was given an opportunity to surrender and live or go out in a blaze of what he probably assumed was glory. We were told he chose the latter. That's no different than the choices the police in this country offer dangerous fugitives who they have cornered or who respond by opening fire. It usually is referred to as "Death by Cop." Assuming that was the case, I don't have a problem with the outcome. A trial would have been long and messy, but it is our way to try criminals and prove their guilt in a court of law. To dispose of criminals otherwise brings us down to the level of the terrorists. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/05/2011 1:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, wrote: On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act. Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so. Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300 indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple countries...Osama just needed a bullet. Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts. Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets were the ones sent to Osama. I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not targeting people for assassination. Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000 troops. Depends on the reasons for such interferences. Can too easily get out of control. Take Kadafi. I know, he has done stuff in the past, but recently he has been a good boy. No one questions why wait so long? Why no indictments or proper warrants? While Osama is obvious, Kadafi is somewhat different. The REAL reasons for the assassination attempts a - control of the Central Bank of Libya, solvent bank too not a IMF bank cartel subservient bank either. - oil, no explanation needed. - might have nationalised some US-Euro interests. - was instrumental player in a United West African State. (colonial control wouldn't like this any more than the formation of the 13 states in America and for the same reasons). - he was a socialist, a lot of revenue was spread around. Nope, big money and big power is why NATO-US-UN-France regime wants him. No act of war either...no congressional approval if you use the UN-NATO thing so in fact bypasses the meaning of US law. And killing children for this corruption? If it had been an attack on the US, go for it. But Kadafi is no threat to the US popper. Nope, Obama wanting Kadafi assassinated is for political revenge and control and not democratic or sovereign reasons. It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they made the right choice and blew his head off on site. Who knows, maybe he is alive, pumped up with drugs and talking. Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story. Good enough for me. I would not want the Seal to take any risks to self or in losing the target. Haven't seen plumer posts, filters working good. -- I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with fleabagger debt. Take a look at ANY country, more debt more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act. Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so. Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300 indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple countries...Osama just needed a bullet. Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts. Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets were the ones sent to Osama. I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not targeting people for assassination. Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000 troops. It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they made the right choice and blew his head off on site. Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story. It was the right thing to do. Capturing him alive would have led to no end of complications and repercussions. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:46:08 -0400, John H
wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Here, just for the fun of it... http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but was instead shot while defenseless. yeah everyone here knows i'm a right winger and i'm not upset osama got killed. you right wingers just are unhappy your white poodle, bush, didnt get him |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/05/2011 5:23 AM, Harryk wrote:
John H wrote: From yesterday's Washington Post: "U.S. analysts and operatives spent years figuring out the courier’s identity, senior administration officials said, concluding that he was a former protege of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-declared mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks who is being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The courier "had our constant attention," one official said. Detainees "identified this man as one of the few al-Qaeda couriers trusted by bin Laden, [and] indicated he might be living with or protecting bin Laden," the official said. But until four years ago, the United States was unable to track the courier down or uncover his real name. In 2009, U.S. officials narrowed down the region in Pakistan where the courier was working, senior administration officials said." 'Years' it says. "Four years ago..." Well, that dumps it in Bush's lap. http://tinyurl.com/6f65um6 Yesterday, Panetta admitted to Brian Williams that 'enhanced interrogation techniques', including waterboarding, provided intel which ultimately lead to the attack. http://tinyurl.com/6kz5423 I'll give Obama a 'C' for allowing the action to take place. He didn't do much else. If that's your evaluation, give Bush an "F," because he stated several times he just wasn't that interested in running down Osama. And you are overstating what the CIA director said. The facts remain: 1. Bush and his cohorts failed to catch Osama. 2. Cheney, Bush & Rumsfeld, et al, lied us into an unnecessary and really stupid war for purely political reasons. 3. Bush blew more than a trillion dollars on that stupid war. 4. Bush hurt our reputation around the world. It's really funny that some of the Bush apologists are now trying to claim partial credit for the killing of Osama. Sorry, Repubs...that don't won't hunt. Your team failed. And Obama agreed with Bush so what is your point? The reality is it became politically convenient to kill Osama. -- I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with fleabagger debt. A penny saved is a government oversight. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Credit Score | General | |||
What credit crunch? | General | |||
What Credit crunch | General | |||
Where Credit Is Due | ASA |