On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:58:58 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:11:14 -0400, wrote:

gee 25% of all american college students major in business. and where
did the harvard and yale and chicago grads go over the last 10 years?

wall street.

you just cant believe the rich would stab us in the back. your right
wing head would just explode at the idea, so instead of blaming a few
thousand hedgefund managers and wall street execs

you blame 100 million hard working americans

you right wingers really DO hate the middle class

Isn't this all getting a bit repetitious?

yeah. right up there with the stuff about obama being a marxist muslim

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:31:55 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:35:29 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

and george bush killed 4400 US troops in iraq while spending a
trillion there

how'd that work out?

About the same as Afghanistan, what's your point.?
Obama is still in both places.

we're winding down in iraq

i know that, as a right winger you dont follow the news but there are
less than 50K troops in iraq

and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11.

On 7/26/10 8:50 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Bummer about the facts isn't it...

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/...reation-in-1q/


Yeah buddy they expect a whopping 0.4% drop in unemployment this year.

Well, is that better than an increase? Seems to me lower is better.


OK well at that rate we will get back to the 2007 unemployment rate in
2023




And your solution is?

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:52:08 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

On 7/26/10 8:50 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Bummer about the facts isn't it...

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/...reation-in-1q/


Yeah buddy they expect a whopping 0.4% drop in unemployment this year.

Well, is that better than an increase? Seems to me lower is better.


OK well at that rate we will get back to the 2007 unemployment rate in
2023




And your solution is?

gas the middle class. they're replaceable.

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:52:52 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:38:16 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:31:55 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:35:29 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

and george bush killed 4400 US troops in iraq while spending a
trillion there

how'd that work out?

About the same as Afghanistan, what's your point.?
Obama is still in both places.

we're winding down in iraq

I will believe when I see it

ROFLMAO!! i know right wingers don't pay attention to the news

but try reading something for once, OK? hell, you might learn that
rush is bull****ting you!


i know that, as a right winger you dont follow the news but there are
less than 50K troops in iraq

and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11.


Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not
been in Afghanistan for 6 years.

hmmm...again you need to read the news.

the taliban just abducted 2 US servicemen the other day

you guys really are stupid aren't you?

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:03:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

and george bush killed 4400 US troops in iraq while spending a
trillion there

how'd that work out?

About the same as Afghanistan, what's your point.?
Obama is still in both places.

And, the troop numbers in Iraq are dropping as per his stated objective.

I suppose you heard about the Afghan surge? They still have more
people GOING IN.

And, they have an exit strategy. A flexible one, but a stated one. Next
question.

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:38:16 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:31:55 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:35:29 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

and george bush killed 4400 US troops in iraq while spending a
trillion there

how'd that work out?

About the same as Afghanistan, what's your point.?
Obama is still in both places.

we're winding down in iraq

I will believe when I see it

i know that, as a right winger you dont follow the news but there are
less than 50K troops in iraq

and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11.


Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not
been in Afghanistan for 6 years.


You can already see it.

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Bummer about the facts isn't it...

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/...reation-in-1q/


Yeah buddy they expect a whopping 0.4% drop in unemployment this year.

Well, is that better than an increase? Seems to me lower is better.


OK well at that rate we will get back to the 2007 unemployment rate in
2023



Sure, except as you know, that's not how an economy works. It ramps up or
down over time.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 7/26/10 8:50 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Bummer about the facts isn't it...

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/...reation-in-1q/


Yeah buddy they expect a whopping 0.4% drop in unemployment this year.

Well, is that better than an increase? Seems to me lower is better.


OK well at that rate we will get back to the 2007 unemployment rate in
2023




And your solution is?

I hope it's not get rid of the Depts. of Energy and Education! I don't think
that's going to solve the problem.

On Jul 26, 8:24*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:03:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

and george bush killed 4400 US troops in iraq while spending a
trillion there

how'd that work out?

About the same as Afghanistan, what's your point.?
Obama is still in both places.

And, the troop numbers in Iraq are dropping as per his stated objective..

I suppose you heard about the Afghan surge? They still have more
people GOING IN.

And, they have an exit strategy. A flexible one, but a stated one. Next
question.

Yes, yes, D'Plume. And exit strategy which is second only to the exit
strategy for Gitmo.