Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:29:49 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: From the title, I thought you were anouncing a new boat coming out on the market or something like that. Or that perhaps she was expecting... :-) Typical male putdown, due to his lack of intellectual horsepower. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/23/10 8:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:25:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Sorry.. I should have marked it as political. My bad. No, you should have posted it somewhere else. You're in charge of the newsgroup. Wow... news to lots of people! w'hine actually thinks he is in charge of something...anything. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry" wrote in message
... Tim wrote: On Mar 23, 2:20 pm, wrote: For the righties... which of these things do you not like? Provisions of the health care overhaul that will take place in 2010: 90 days after enactment - Provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage. 180 days after enactment - Require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26. this year - Provide a $250 rebade to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits have run out. -- Nom=de=Plume From the title, I thought you were anouncing a new boat coming out on the market or something like that. No chance of that. She's not interested in such a thing. And, no response of substance from you. Do you need to post a link? Go ahead, no one will smack you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"lil abner" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: For the righties... which of these things do you not like? Provisions of the health care overhaul that will take place in 2010: 90 days after enactment - Provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage. 180 days after enactment - Require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26. this year - Provide a $250 rebade to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits have run out. There is already access to high risk pools. The costs are 3 times or more than for everybody else though. "States are not required to have an alternative option for medically uninsurable individuals to access coverage, but most do." Now, there's a guarantee. Cost wouldn't be an issue if there was a public option or *gasp* single payer. Everyone's cost would be lower. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:20:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: For the righties... which of these things do you not like? Provisions of the health care overhaul that will take place in 2010: 90 days after enactment - Provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage. 180 days after enactment - Require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26. this year - Provide a $250 rebade to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits have run out. Nobody has said, or even said they will limit, what the insurance companies can charge for all of these new liabilities. The real showdown will come when our insurance options and prices show up this fall. The CEO of Caterpillar is estimating this will cost his company $100 million in additional health care insurance costs. That will get passed on to the employees, one way or another.. Insurance companies are currently raising prices... did you miss that? It's a fix that's coming. I doubt it. His costs are skyrocketting now. Every reputable economist, not to mention the CBO, predicts savings. Where is all of the extra medical capacity going to come from to deal with 31 million new patients? Supply and demand says the cost of providing care will go up. I guess they don't make doctors anymore. How sad. Hospitals seem to think they'll be fine. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/23/10 8:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:16:54 -0400, wrote: Where is all of the extra medical capacity going to come from to deal with 31 million new patients? Supply and demand says the cost of providing care will go up. And quality and availability will go down. It has to, supply is relatively inelastic. Here we have a couple of "haves" hoping to maintain their medical distance from the "have nots." |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hk wrote:
On 3/23/10 8:16 PM, Larry wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 23, 2:20 pm, wrote: For the righties... which of these things do you not like? Provisions of the health care overhaul that will take place in 2010: 90 days after enactment - Provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage. 180 days after enactment - Require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26. this year - Provide a $250 rebade to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits have run out. -- Nom=de=Plume From the title, I thought you were anouncing a new boat coming out on the market or something like that. No chance of that. She's not interested in such a thing. Another Krueger? No idea if she's interested in that. |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry" wrote in message
... hk wrote: On 3/23/10 8:16 PM, Larry wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 23, 2:20 pm, wrote: For the righties... which of these things do you not like? Provisions of the health care overhaul that will take place in 2010: 90 days after enactment - Provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage. 180 days after enactment - Require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26. this year - Provide a $250 rebade to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits have run out. -- Nom=de=Plume From the title, I thought you were anouncing a new boat coming out on the market or something like that. No chance of that. She's not interested in such a thing. Another Krueger? No idea if she's interested in that. Except that I probably will buy something in the next couple of months, which is what I've said for a while. Now you know. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:16:54 -0400, wrote: Where is all of the extra medical capacity going to come from to deal with 31 million new patients? Supply and demand says the cost of providing care will go up. And quality and availability will go down. It has to, supply is relatively inelastic. Not at all. Doctors and hospitals being in demand, will increase supply. Why don't you create a death panel... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coming soon . . . | ASA | |||
Coming Very Soon!!! | ASA | |||
Coming Soon!!! | ASA | |||
Coming Soon!!! | ASA | |||
THE SECOND COMING | ASA |