Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/23/10 8:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:16:54 -0400, wrote: Where is all of the extra medical capacity going to come from to deal with 31 million new patients? Supply and demand says the cost of providing care will go up. And quality and availability will go down. It has to, supply is relatively inelastic. Here we have a couple of "haves" hoping to maintain their medical distance from the "have nots." |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:16:54 -0400, wrote: Where is all of the extra medical capacity going to come from to deal with 31 million new patients? Supply and demand says the cost of providing care will go up. And quality and availability will go down. It has to, supply is relatively inelastic. Not at all. Doctors and hospitals being in demand, will increase supply. Why don't you create a death panel... -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 23, 8:16*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:20:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: For the righties... which of these things do you not like? Provisions of the health care overhaul that will take place in 2010: 90 days after enactment - Provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions. 180 days after enactment - Bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage. 180 days after enactment - Require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26. this year - Provide a $250 rebade to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits have run out. Nobody has said, or even said they will limit, what the insurance companies can charge for all of these new liabilities. The real showdown will come when our insurance options and prices show up this fall. The CEO of Caterpillar is estimating this will cost his company $100 million in additional health care insurance costs. That will get passed on to the employees, one way or another.. Where is all of the extra medical capacity going to come from to deal with 31 million new patients? Supply and demand says the cost of providing care will go up. From a blog: Is this bill as bad as it sounds? No. The Bill That Nobody Read is far worse than you likely know. No time here to run through it point by point. Plenty of stuff on the JawkTawk site and all over the net. Only pinheads and loons don't think this is about controlling your life and taking more money away from productive society to buy votes for permanent far-left power. In a way, here is all you need to know: •Funding* is provided to shift how many people, including illegal aliens, from "free" walk-in ER care to taxpayer-funded insurance policies? 32,000,000 •Funding is provided to support and train how many new health care professionals? 0 •Funding is provided to build how many new hospitals or medical facilities of any kind? 0 •Funding is provided to hire how many new IRS agents for STASI-like enforcement of this law? 17,000 •Funding is provided to establish how many new Federal bureaucracies to regulate your medical care and insurance? 159** * "Funding" of course has a whole new definition, since — before HealthScare — the U.S. government now borrows 44˘ of every $1 it spends. ** Also, many existing agencies will be expanded, such as the IRS, which is the "primary agency" for enforcing HealthScare. Only certified moonbats (and there are plenty who subscribe to JawkTawk) have ever looked at this as having anything whatsoever to do with either "health" or "cost containment." This is, was, and always shall be about institutionalizing a culture of dependency to ensure the power of the left. Nationalizing health care has always been the Holy Grail, and now it is law. Is anyone exempted from from this socialized health care scheme? Yes: the people who wrote the law , Barry Soetoro, Congress, and unions. The latter's "Cadillac plans" were to be taxed at a far higher rate, but that was one of hundreds of payoffs fixed in the planned "reconciliation" bill. Will the Republicans stop the reconciliation bill, which is the only reason that HealthScare passed? No. Anything you hear to the contrary is just spin. Corruption ruled the day and delivered the vote. The radicals won, America lost. End of story. Okay, but now I'm hearing enormous noise about repeal. We can repeal this, right? No. This law will never be repealed. Parts of it may be thrown out by future Congresses, but no "middle-class entitlement" has ever been reversed. Not here, not anywhere. We used to be the New World. Now we are the New Europe. Elections matter, and America dozed off at the wheel in November 2008. Almost nothing Barry Soetoro said then or has ever said since is true. He lies serially, effortlessly, pathologically. But he is doing exactly what any thinking person knew he would do. Some of it was in his dimestore novels, and even more of it was in the books that shaped his thinking (e.g. Rules For Radicals). Most of the facts were there for all to see before gullibility and Bush fatigue and "white guilt" put this avowed socialist in the White House. As his racist, anti- American "pastor" said back then, "America's chickens have come home to roost." Groups like Tea Party Nation are pushing now for state-level recalls of U.S. House members who voted for this. What about that? This is JawkTawk, not Comedy Central. What about term limits? We have term limits. They're called "elections," and they are rarely exercised to replace the entrenched corruption. As of today, Attorneys General of 12 states have vowed to file lawsuits to challenge the constitutionality of forcing their citizens to buy insurance. What about that? This is the best shot at "civil disobedience," if you will. If only one or two states, never mind a dozen or more, were to ultimately take this stand, even if failing in the judicial system, what could the Federal government do to enforce this mandate? This is also the kind of provision that could potentially be struck by a future Congress. It would be entertaining then to see the insurance companies sue over the key bribe that kept them off the battlefield. By then, they'll be quasi public utilities anyway, so they may be dealing with their own shareholder class actions. If this mandate were ever defeated at the Supreme Court level, the whole mess of a law would be in jeopardy. Budget-busting Medicaid administrative costs is another sure bet for immediate state pushback. In the same way that the Democrats renamed "nuclear option" for when they used it ("reconciliation"), they will have to find a new marketing term for "unfunded mandate." Watch also for lawsuits to expose the particulars of all the many taxpayer-funded backroom bribes. Now the liberals have momentum. Are cap-and-tax and amnesty next? No chance for these other shoes to drop before the next election cycle. The Democrats have used up every ounce of "political capital," defying the wishes of 75% of America. With control of the White House and supermajorities in the House and Senate, it still took them over a year and hundreds of billions in bribes to pass HealthScare. They will now make noise about these other loopy ideas, but will get nowhere. People are furious. In November, Republicans will take back the House and Senate, yes? That's a real long shot, very doubtful. Seven months is an eternity in politics. People have short memories, especially since nothing will change in health care over that time span. The economy is likely to improve somewhat over that time — despite Washington, not because of it. It will be a jobless recovery, so the economy will be the overarching issue in November, not health care. And if Barry drops bunker-busters on Iran's nuke sites next fall, then all bets are off. And don't think Rahmbo and AxelRose aren't already cooking up an October Surprise. Expect the unexpected. Nevertheless, big gains in the House and Senate are a reasonable guess, and that will have a strong effect on slowing down and impeding the radical agenda. How will any of this be paid for? Debt, taxes, and the printing press (inflation). The CBO "estimates" are fantasies of the highest order. Meanwhile, by any GAAP-based principle, the country is technically bankrupt already. Don't take our word for it, look right here . The key number is UNFUNDED LIABILITIES. This number is $108 trillion. The entire Gross Domestic Product of the U.S. is $14.5 trillion. Now the Soetoro administration is spending trillions more in money that does not exist. Eight percent (8%) of the Soetoro administration has ever worked in the private sector. Rebels without a clue. Jeepers! Somebody, pass the Zoloft! Do you have any good news? Of course. Vincent and Jules are gearing up for November 2nd. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coming soon . . . | ASA | |||
Coming Very Soon!!! | ASA | |||
Coming Soon!!! | ASA | |||
Coming Soon!!! | ASA | |||
THE SECOND COMING | ASA |