On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:29:34 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article , says...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/15/09 1:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:36:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:13 -0700,
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:59:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

On Oct 14, 4:02 pm,
wrote:
Headline, Troy NY...

After the recent suspension of a eagle scout for having a
penknife,
locked in his car, locked in a survival kit for 20 days
this is
the
only
conclusion one can come to. You guys are a bunch of morons
with
personal
agendas which obviously get in the way of education.
Quick, I
hear
a
lunch lady was seen with a straw in her hands, what if she
made
a
spitball from a napkin? I hope you will find her and send
her
directly
to jail... Idiots. Really though, it's probably more of a
statement
from
an ignorant vice principal who hates the fact that the kid
is a
good
solid American who wants to go to West Point.

Follow-up: Apparently West Point has contacted him
personally
and
told
him these idiots prejudice and personal agenda won't hurt
his
wishes
to
serve his country.. Morons, they should all be voted
out...

I hope they get that lunch lady before she goes off and
picks
up a
spork...
of course, the red states would never do something like
this...for
example, in texas you're allowed to own as many guns as
you
want

but women are not allowed to buy the little trojan
'personal
stimulator' because that offends the morals of texas
politicians.

so guns are unregulated

dildoes are banned.

red state sanity, i suppose
Red states.

You mean the ones with the worst health care and school
systems?
The fix is... Pass a law that allows dildos.
Make contraception mandatory.

I'm pretty sure they also have the highest incidence of teen
mothers.
I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers?
Or
maybe teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a
good
idea.
That's really sick.
Gosh, that incites you to comment. But the continuous barrage of
"Cowardly ****" comments by another liberal, Dickson, brings not
a
peep.

THAT'S really sick.
You guys make me sick. You're such a defender of the fetus, but
have no
concern about the baby or the mother after the child arrives. You
and
your
"people" vote or support a vote against every sort of social
program,
and
that's the real hypocrisy.

Because they don't care about life...they care about controlling
women.
Exactly right. They claim that they're anti-abortion, as though
there's
anyone that's pro-abortion. Complete nonsense. Abortion rates are
down. I
hope that someday there won't be a single one. But, they would
rather
have women dying, because some men can't take responsibility for
their
behavior.

Well dearie. You are the keeper of the keys. You don't have to open
the
door if you don't want to. It's your responsibility to protect your
own
door against intruders.

Including rape and incest?

FYI, I really don't need your condescention. It doesn't impress
anyone.

Why yes Little Feather. I assume you wouldn't lie there like a wet
noodle, or would you?
Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...


Yeah, like all the Republican senators who voted for the bs compromise
healthcare bill...

Another Krause tactic. Either you are him or a very attentive understudy.
Crikey.


You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a rant? I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:29:34 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
. ..
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/15/09 1:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:36:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:13 -0700,
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:59:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

On Oct 14, 4:02 pm,
wrote:
Headline, Troy NY...

After the recent suspension of a eagle scout for having
a
penknife,
locked in his car, locked in a survival kit for 20 days
this is
the
only
conclusion one can come to. You guys are a bunch of
morons
with
personal
agendas which obviously get in the way of education.
Quick, I
hear
a
lunch lady was seen with a straw in her hands, what if
she
made
a
spitball from a napkin? I hope you will find her and
send
her
directly
to jail... Idiots. Really though, it's probably more of
a
statement
from
an ignorant vice principal who hates the fact that the
kid
is a
good
solid American who wants to go to West Point.

Follow-up: Apparently West Point has contacted him
personally
and
told
him these idiots prejudice and personal agenda won't
hurt
his
wishes
to
serve his country.. Morons, they should all be voted
out...

I hope they get that lunch lady before she goes off and
picks
up a
spork...
of course, the red states would never do something like
this...for
example, in texas you're allowed to own as many guns as
you
want

but women are not allowed to buy the little trojan
'personal
stimulator' because that offends the morals of texas
politicians.

so guns are unregulated

dildoes are banned.

red state sanity, i suppose
Red states.

You mean the ones with the worst health care and school
systems?
The fix is... Pass a law that allows dildos.
Make contraception mandatory.

I'm pretty sure they also have the highest incidence of teen
mothers.
I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed
mothers?
Or
maybe teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a
good
idea.
That's really sick.
Gosh, that incites you to comment. But the continuous barrage
of
"Cowardly ****" comments by another liberal, Dickson, brings
not
a
peep.

THAT'S really sick.
You guys make me sick. You're such a defender of the fetus, but
have no
concern about the baby or the mother after the child arrives.
You
and
your
"people" vote or support a vote against every sort of social
program,
and
that's the real hypocrisy.

Because they don't care about life...they care about controlling
women.
Exactly right. They claim that they're anti-abortion, as though
there's
anyone that's pro-abortion. Complete nonsense. Abortion rates are
down. I
hope that someday there won't be a single one. But, they would
rather
have women dying, because some men can't take responsibility for
their
behavior.

Well dearie. You are the keeper of the keys. You don't have to open
the
door if you don't want to. It's your responsibility to protect your
own
door against intruders.

Including rape and incest?

FYI, I really don't need your condescention. It doesn't impress
anyone.

Why yes Little Feather. I assume you wouldn't lie there like a wet
noodle, or would you?
Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and
incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one
percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...


Yeah, like all the Republican senators who voted for the bs compromise
healthcare bill...

Another Krause tactic. Either you are him or a very attentive
understudy.
Crikey.


You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .

You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the
quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'.

You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are
answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you.

Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being
obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that.

'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about
your boat or the one you're thinking of buying.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..

You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a
rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but
a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the
quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'.

You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are
answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you.

Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being
obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that.

'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about
your boat or the one you're thinking of buying.


Name is Em.

So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have a
couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a
conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't
know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't show
up on my doorstep.

I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel free
to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific.

I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with
themself.

I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and
typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own
one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to
take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one?

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/20/09 2:13 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...

You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a
rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but
a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the
quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'.

You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are
answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you.

Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being
obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that.

'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about
your boat or the one you're thinking of buying.


Name is Em.

So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have a
couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a
conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't
know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't show
up on my doorstep.

I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel free
to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific.

I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with
themself.

I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and
typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own
one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to
take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one?



Herring isn't much of a boater. He had a boat, but he rarely used it it
and was trying to sell it. Herring is here to peddle his right-wing
racist agenda, and *impress* us with his lack of prowess in golf.

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:13:55 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a
rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but
a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the
quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'.

You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are
answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you.

Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being
obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that.

'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about
your boat or the one you're thinking of buying.


Name is Em.

So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have a
couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a
conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't
know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't show
up on my doorstep.

I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel free
to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific.

I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with
themself.

I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and
typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own
one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to
take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one?

Herring thinks senority applies to newsgroups and you should submit to
his questioning. It's an example of the advanced degradation of his
brain or that he never possessed the ability to comport himself in an
appropriate manner for the situation.

As you've noticed, we don't give one another much room in rec.boats.
The past several elections and wars have offered plenty of opportunity
for folks to self-identify. Herring shows up as ex-military who hates
government but has made his entire living off government-run agencies.

You seem like an upright, honest person who's willing to engage all. I
admire that in anyone but rec.boats may require a more guarded
approach. Some of these idiots will use any shred of information to
claw for a foothold.

I hope you get some satisfaction from the exchanges. Please protect
yourself so you don't burn out. Your voice is a welcome one.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:13:55 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...

You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a
rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently,
but
a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the
quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'.

You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are
answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you.

Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being
obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that.

'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about
your boat or the one you're thinking of buying.


Name is Em.

So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have
a
couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a
conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't
know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't
show
up on my doorstep.

I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel
free
to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific.

I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with
themself.

I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and
typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own
one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to
take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one?

Herring thinks senority applies to newsgroups and you should submit to
his questioning. It's an example of the advanced degradation of his
brain or that he never possessed the ability to comport himself in an
appropriate manner for the situation.

As you've noticed, we don't give one another much room in rec.boats.
The past several elections and wars have offered plenty of opportunity
for folks to self-identify. Herring shows up as ex-military who hates
government but has made his entire living off government-run agencies.

You seem like an upright, honest person who's willing to engage all. I
admire that in anyone but rec.boats may require a more guarded
approach. Some of these idiots will use any shred of information to
claw for a foothold.

I hope you get some satisfaction from the exchanges. Please protect
yourself so you don't burn out. Your voice is a welcome one.


Mostly honest. And, they can keep their feet to themselves. Sorry Joan
Rivers.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:13:55 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a
rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but
a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the
quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'.

You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are
answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you.

Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being
obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that.

'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about
your boat or the one you're thinking of buying.


Name is Em.

So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have a
couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a
conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't
know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't show
up on my doorstep.

I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel free
to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific.

I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with
themself.

Perhaps you're in error here.

I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and
typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own
one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to
take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one?

Yes, as a matter of fact, I did.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:13:55 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...

You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a
rant?
I
assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm
assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope
that's
obvious).

The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but
it's a cute attempt to change the focus.


I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently,
but
a
cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either.

plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the
quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'.

You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are
answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you.

Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being
obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that.

'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about
your boat or the one you're thinking of buying.


Name is Em.

So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have
a
couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a
conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't
know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't
show
up on my doorstep.

I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel
free
to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific.

I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with
themself.

Perhaps you're in error here.

Perhaps. Perhaps not.


I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and
typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own
one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to
take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one?

Yes, as a matter of fact, I did.

Did it include an intelligence test section? lol

--
Nom=de=Plume