nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article , says...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/15/09 1:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:36:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:13 -0700,
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:59:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

On Oct 14, 4:02 pm,
wrote:
Headline, Troy NY...

After the recent suspension of a eagle scout for having a
penknife,
locked in his car, locked in a survival kit for 20 days
this is
the
only
conclusion one can come to. You guys are a bunch of morons
with
personal
agendas which obviously get in the way of education. Quick,
I
hear
a
lunch lady was seen with a straw in her hands, what if she
made
a
spitball from a napkin? I hope you will find her and send
her
directly
to jail... Idiots. Really though, it's probably more of a
statement
from
an ignorant vice principal who hates the fact that the kid
is a
good
solid American who wants to go to West Point.

Follow-up: Apparently West Point has contacted him
personally
and
told
him these idiots prejudice and personal agenda won't hurt
his
wishes
to
serve his country.. Morons, they should all be voted out...

I hope they get that lunch lady before she goes off and
picks
up a
spork...
of course, the red states would never do something like
this...for
example, in texas you're allowed to own as many guns as you
want

but women are not allowed to buy the little trojan 'personal
stimulator' because that offends the morals of texas
politicians.

so guns are unregulated

dildoes are banned.

red state sanity, i suppose
Red states.

You mean the ones with the worst health care and school
systems?
The fix is... Pass a law that allows dildos.
Make contraception mandatory.

I'm pretty sure they also have the highest incidence of teen
mothers.
I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers?
Or
maybe teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.
That's really sick.
Gosh, that incites you to comment. But the continuous barrage of
"Cowardly ****" comments by another liberal, Dickson, brings not a
peep.

THAT'S really sick.
You guys make me sick. You're such a defender of the fetus, but
have no
concern about the baby or the mother after the child arrives. You
and
your
"people" vote or support a vote against every sort of social
program,
and
that's the real hypocrisy.

Because they don't care about life...they care about controlling
women.
Exactly right. They claim that they're anti-abortion, as though
there's
anyone that's pro-abortion. Complete nonsense. Abortion rates are
down. I
hope that someday there won't be a single one. But, they would rather
have women dying, because some men can't take responsibility for
their
behavior.

Well dearie. You are the keeper of the keys. You don't have to open
the
door if you don't want to. It's your responsibility to protect your
own
door against intruders.

Including rape and incest?

FYI, I really don't need your condescention. It doesn't impress anyone.

Why yes Little Feather. I assume you wouldn't lie there like a wet
noodle, or would you?
Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...


Yeah, like all the Republican senators who voted for the bs compromise
healthcare bill...

Another Krause tactic. Either you are him or a very attentive
understudy. Crikey.

On 10/15/09 10:12 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:32:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500,
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll be
saying no.

Do you make all your decisions based on one vote?

Frankin stole the election with the help of ACORN and others.. He did
not win, he should not be there in the first place...


snerk



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

On Oct 15, 10:16*pm, Tosk wrote:


Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-

tell you what.

you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:16 pm, Tosk wrote:

Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-

tell you what.

you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?

You have no position to bargain from.

On 10/16/09 7:24 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:16 pm, wrote:


Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-

tell you what.

you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?


The IIA means nothing to Scott Ingersoll. If he tried to buy a firearm
from a legitimate dealer, he'd be snagged and turned away by the
"instant check." Felons can't buy firearms legally. He'd never be
approved for a carry permit, either.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

On Oct 16, 7:34*am, Jim wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:16 pm, Tosk wrote:

Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-

tell you what.

you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?

You have no position to bargain from.

really? you mean aborition is illegal in this country?

since when?

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/16/09 7:24 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:16 pm, wrote:


Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-

tell you what.

you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?


The IIA means nothing to Scott Ingersoll. If he tried to buy a firearm
from a legitimate dealer, he'd be snagged and turned away by the "instant
check." Felons can't buy firearms legally. He'd never be approved for a
carry permit, either.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

The Freak would be a walking disaster with a firearm.
Can you imagine him trying to negotiate a stairwell...probably with his
safety off. One slip and kaboom!

On 10/16/09 9:07 AM, Don White wrote:
"H the wrote in message
m...
On 10/16/09 7:24 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:16 pm, wrote:


Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-

tell you what.

you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?


The IIA means nothing to Scott Ingersoll. If he tried to buy a firearm
from a legitimate dealer, he'd be snagged and turned away by the "instant
check." Felons can't buy firearms legally. He'd never be approved for a
carry permit, either.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

The Freak would be a walking disaster with a firearm.
Can you imagine him trying to negotiate a stairwell...probably with his
safety off. One slip and kaboom!




He's exactly the sort of moron who would walk around with his finger on
the trigger, since that is the way he walks around now. :)

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 16, 7:34 am, Jim wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:16 pm, Tosk wrote:
Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-
tell you what.
you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?
You have no position to bargain from.

really? you mean aborition is illegal in this country?

since when?
No dummy. I mean you have no position to bargain from. Think about it.

On Oct 16, 9:20*am, TJ ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 16, 7:34 am, Jim wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:16 pm, Tosk wrote:
Why would you even argue such silly logic... If you listened to NDP
(actually Harry) you would think every abortion is from rape and incest
and that there is absolutly no way to accomodate the 1/4 of one percent
which actually are... The problem with the far left is there is no
middle of the road, no compromise...-
tell you what.
you compromise on the 2nd amendment and we'll talk, m'kay?
You have no position to bargain from.

really? you mean aborition is illegal in this country?

since when?

No dummy. I mean you have no position to bargain from. Think about it.-

yeah i know. we've won everything. nothing left to bargain for

sucks to be you, doesn't it?