Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#191
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:21:21 -0400, Tosk wrote:
Uh, If I call myself a King, does that make it so? Snow is only a republican because somebody was already running as a dem. Either way, I knew you really couldn't cite anything that would support your claim.. Guess you really are Harry... Later... Snowe is one of the last of a breed, New England moderate Republicans. New England used to be full of them, and was, at one time the base of the party, no longer. The House no longer has *any* Republicans from New England, and there are only a few Republican Senators. You are going to have to move west. It's the only place that remains a Republican stronghold. Hell, even the South is going Democrat. |
#192
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a rant? I assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope that's obvious). The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but it's a cute attempt to change the focus. I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but a cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either. plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'. You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you. Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that. 'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about your boat or the one you're thinking of buying. |
#193
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:36:42 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:13 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:59:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Oct 14, 4:02 pm, Tosk wrote: Headline, Troy NY... After the recent suspension of a eagle scout for having a penknife, locked in his car, locked in a survival kit for 20 days this is the only conclusion one can come to. You guys are a bunch of morons with personal agendas which obviously get in the way of education. Quick, I hear a lunch lady was seen with a straw in her hands, what if she made a spitball from a napkin? I hope you will find her and send her directly to jail... Idiots. Really though, it's probably more of a statement from an ignorant vice principal who hates the fact that the kid is a good solid American who wants to go to West Point. Follow-up: Apparently West Point has contacted him personally and told him these idiots prejudice and personal agenda won't hurt his wishes to serve his country.. Morons, they should all be voted out... I hope they get that lunch lady before she goes off and picks up a spork... of course, the red states would never do something like this...for example, in texas you're allowed to own as many guns as you want but women are not allowed to buy the little trojan 'personal stimulator' because that offends the morals of texas politicians. so guns are unregulated dildoes are banned. red state sanity, i suppose Red states. You mean the ones with the worst health care and school systems? The fix is... Pass a law that allows dildos. Make contraception mandatory. I'm pretty sure they also have the highest incidence of teen mothers. I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe teen-unwed mothers. Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea. http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=8971 http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/001354.htm Gene, do you think if you excluded the big cities from the 'red state' populations you'd get the same results? Do you believe the problems lie in the rural countryside? Or are you just regurgitating some cute statistics someone developed? Show me the same state comparisons with the big cities excluded. Then you'll make a valid point. Besides, it doesn't change my attitude with regard to sterilization after the first abortion. I don't care if the parent is red or blue. |
#195
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:15:26 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Such as? And Snow is not a republican, well, maybe in name... In any case, Snowe's a Republican. I'll let you look them up... no public option, etc. -- Nom=de=Plume She's a Republican of a very rare sort. Reasonable. She's willing to talk in a serious fashion. Pretty rare for a Republican, but it's welcome. She has too much power for that single vote, however. Just looked up "reasonable" in Websters and it didn't say anything about "bought and paid for"... By whom do you think she's been bought? Certainly not the insurance lobby, if she voted for *any* semblance of reform. Why? Because Obama said so.. Maybe Geitner, Murtha, Jefferson, Rangle, Dodd, Kerry or one of the others who should be investigated for fraud? The bar keeps changing. First it was Health Care Reform, then when that didn't work, the boogie man was changed to Health Insurance Reform. Just like Jobs created, turned to Jobs Saved (only 30,000 to date anyway). What will it be next, Health Provider Reform, hey, there are lots of Doctors out there to blame? Either way, wait till the "open door negotiations" come out from behind closed doors and we will see what earmarks Snow gets for her vote. Either way, now that one Republican voted for it, it's now completely and totally bipartisan, snerk... |
#196
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:16:09 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Molly Ivins was one amazing chick. I was sad when she died. Molly Ivins was the goods. Why couldn't it have been Peggy Noonan, Michelle Malkin or Liz Cheney? I don't wish anyone to die, unless they're a mosquito or a pigeon. lol -- Nom=de=Plume Liz Cheney is a grounded pigeon -- wingless with a long tai and earsl. Michelle Malkin is a giant mosquito carrying a deadly disease. Peggy Noonan is just misguided. I should have listed Ann Coulter. They all make me shudder. How a woman, and they're not stupid, to have the views they do is not understandable, at least not by me. Maybe cause they read... |
#197
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John H." wrote in message
... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a rant? I assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope that's obvious). The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but it's a cute attempt to change the focus. I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but a cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either. plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'. You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you. Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that. 'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about your boat or the one you're thinking of buying. Name is Em. So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have a couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't show up on my doorstep. I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel free to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific. I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with themself. I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one? -- Nom=de=Plume |
#198
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:15:26 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Such as? And Snow is not a republican, well, maybe in name... In any case, Snowe's a Republican. I'll let you look them up... no public option, etc. -- Nom=de=Plume She's a Republican of a very rare sort. Reasonable. She's willing to talk in a serious fashion. Pretty rare for a Republican, but it's welcome. She has too much power for that single vote, however. Just looked up "reasonable" in Websters and it didn't say anything about "bought and paid for"... By whom do you think she's been bought? Certainly not the insurance lobby, if she voted for *any* semblance of reform. Why? Because Obama said so.. Maybe Geitner, Murtha, Jefferson, Rangle, Dodd, Kerry or one of the others who should be investigated for fraud? The bar keeps changing. First it was Health Care Reform, then when that didn't work, the boogie man was changed to Health Insurance Reform. Just like Jobs created, turned to Jobs Saved (only 30,000 to date anyway). What will it be next, Health Provider Reform, hey, there are lots of Doctors out there to blame? Either way, wait till the "open door negotiations" come out from behind closed doors and we will see what earmarks Snow gets for her vote. Either way, now that one Republican voted for it, it's now completely and totally bipartisan, snerk... Don't use snerk. You'll be accused of being Harry. lol Do you or don't you believe that many senators (on both sides of the aisle) are bought and paid for by the insurance lobby (cartel actually). Not sure what Geitner and Murtha have to do with healthcare reform. Is this a conspiracy theory of yours? Then, ask me if I care if reform is bipartisan. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#199
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:16:09 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Molly Ivins was one amazing chick. I was sad when she died. Molly Ivins was the goods. Why couldn't it have been Peggy Noonan, Michelle Malkin or Liz Cheney? I don't wish anyone to die, unless they're a mosquito or a pigeon. lol -- Nom=de=Plume Liz Cheney is a grounded pigeon -- wingless with a long tai and earsl. Michelle Malkin is a giant mosquito carrying a deadly disease. Peggy Noonan is just misguided. I should have listed Ann Coulter. They all make me shudder. How a woman, and they're not stupid, to have the views they do is not understandable, at least not by me. Maybe cause they read... I think I'll go with jps' opinion on this. They're totally disgusting people. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#200
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/09 2:13 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John wrote in message ... You seem obsessed with him. Can you tell me why without going into a rant? I assure you I'm not Harry, an understudy, nor do I even know him. I'm assuming he's not even using his real name. I'm certainly not (I hope that's obvious). The subject was you, not Harry. There's no obsession involved, but it's a cute attempt to change the focus. I thought I was Harry? Hmmm... you're not still confused, apparently, but a cute attempt to claim no obsession with me either. plum, you and Harry share several traits, one of which is the quickness with which you accuse others of being 'obsessed'. You make a tremendous number of posts and if two or three are answered, then the responder is 'obsessed' with you. Usually, as in the case of Harry, those who accuse others of being obsessed are quite obsessed with themselves. There's a name for that. 'I went to Google looking for boating groups' - right. Tell us about your boat or the one you're thinking of buying. Name is Em. So, because two people who've never met and who don't know each other have a couple of common traits that means we're the same person or it's a conspiracy? You're the one who plonked me, then changed your mind. Don't know if you're obsessed or not. Don't really care, as long as you don't show up on my doorstep. I don't think I make anywhere near the number of many others here. Feel free to do a count and let us know who's the most prolific. I don't think I'm obsessed with myself any more than anyone else is with themself. I didn't say I went to google, I said Outlook. I looked under news, and typed in boats. I'm not thinking of buying a boat, nor do I currently own one. I told someone that I used to own a Hobie (part owner). Do I need to take a boating test before I get to post here? Did you take one? Herring isn't much of a boater. He had a boat, but he rarely used it it and was trying to sell it. Herring is here to peddle his right-wing racist agenda, and *impress* us with his lack of prowess in golf. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush Blows $1.6 Trillion on War of Lunacy | General | |||
speaking of Lunacy.... | General | |||
State of the art | ASA | |||
Wash State Mandatory Boater Education Bill clears state senate: | General | |||
More Cuban Lunacy | Cruising |