On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time tracking down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:isfed5d19dtv7ltab01ee0b0kvj6hd6ej3@4ax. com...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll be
saying no.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:32:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:isfed5d19dtv7ltab01ee0b0kvj6hd6ej3@4ax .com...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll be
saying no.

Do you make all your decisions based on one vote?

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:32:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:7cmed5dqq7i2atkq179vbrgu4152647vtc@4ax. com...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:isfed5d19dtv7ltab01ee0b0kvj6hd6ej3@4a x.com...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder

wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers?
Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be
castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of
years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like
you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll be
saying no.

Do you make all your decisions based on one vote?


Depends on the vote I suppose. Sometimes it would, certainly. Other times,
it would not. Don't you look at the specifics and make a decision based on
that?

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:32:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:isfed5d19dtv7ltab01ee0b0kvj6hd6ej3@4ax .com...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll be
saying no.

Do you make all your decisions based on one vote?

Frankin stole the election with the help of ACORN and others.. He did
not win, he should not be there in the first place...

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:32:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:isfed5d19dtv7ltab01ee0b0kvj6hd6ej3@4ax .com...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder

wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers?
Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a
good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be
castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of
years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like
you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time
tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to
be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're
located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll
be
saying no.

Do you make all your decisions based on one vote?

Frankin stole the election with the help of ACORN and others.. He did
not win, he should not be there in the first place...


Sounds like Bush rationale. Oh wait... lol


--
Nom=de=Plume

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:21:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:32:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:isfed5d19dtv7ltab01ee0b0kvj6hd6ej3@4ax .com...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder

wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers?
Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a
good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be
castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of
years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like
you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time
tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to
be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're
located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll
be
saying no.

Do you make all your decisions based on one vote?

Frankin stole the election with the help of ACORN and others.. He did
not win, he should not be there in the first place...


Sounds like Bush rationale. Oh wait... lol

Franken stole the election? Is this coming out of the birther,
deather, teabagger or the NRA camp?

Maybe Rush, Beck, Medved or Savage has a line on it.

Did John Stossel or Geraldo investigate?

On 10/15/09 10:12 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:32:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:51:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500,
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good
idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you
think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed
father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you
do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.


So, do you support them or not? I'm not going to waste my time tracking
down
your posts. It's a simple question. Why not just answer it and be done
with
it?

You hadn't asked the question.

No, I don't support the Republicans who voted against Franken's
amendment.

Next time read the answers to your posts. Or, just quit making
assumptions which are stupid.


Ok. So, you don't support them. In that case, any of them who happen to be
in your state would not get your vote. I don't know where you're located,
but if one of them seeks to get elected and asks for your vote, you'll be
saying no.

Do you make all your decisions based on one vote?

Frankin stole the election with the help of ACORN and others.. He did
not win, he should not be there in the first place...


snerk



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

"H the K" wrote in message
m...

snerk


That's not close enough... use snerk or snerky. lol

--
Nom=de=Plume