Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to talk.politics.guns,rec.boats,alt.fan.howard-stern
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
queenie wrote in
: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:09:06 GMT, KK wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:17:19 -0400, queenie wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:44:10 -0400, Demon Buddha wrote: Howard Brazee wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha wrote: Um... not likely. Runaway inflation is not a result of economic growth, but of out of control printing of paper money, which our esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to kick off and which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights GW's puny mind could unlikely wrap itself around. I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax of a huge deficit we will pay. I terms of principle, I fully agree. In terms of degree, I must part company with you a bit. Though my logical mind knew things could be worse than Bush, my heart didn't really want to believe it. Obama shattered that by putting GW to shame in terms of incompetence, avarice, hubris, out of control spending, and doing nothing of value. I can hardly believe that it would have been possible to outstrip Bush by such a margin, and yet here we are. Amazing. Get back to me on that after eight years! Jeez, the man's been in office for NINE months!!!! And he's already given us a $1.4 TRILLION deficit and is entertaining and engouraging some profoundly stupid legislation - the *cheaper and less ridiculous version* of which will cost another $2.5 TRILLION I don't know how many trillions--still, he's doing what he can to fix the mess the Republicans left. That mess was caused by both sides of the aisle, not just one. Maybe things will balance out and we'll have an amazing surplus like the one Bill Clinton left us Clinton's surpluses were in 1999 and 2000 and consisted of $123B and $230B respectively, however that was only on budgeted items since the national debt increased in those two years by $147.9B and $1.61T overall on his watch. Now, do you wish to saddle Clinton with that or charge it to the Republican Congress? --you know, the surplus Bush and Co. squandered. Yeah, uh huh......That was squandered by both sides of the aisle on Iraq among other things. -- Sleep well tonight, RD (The Sandman) Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 2012 Pelosi GTxi SS/RT Sport Edition | General | |||
Perry & Palin for 2012 | General | |||
Romney in 2012 | General | |||
Location of 2012 whitewater coarse | General | |||
Rule 12 - Sailing Rule | ASA |